The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis)
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Torque Gauge R&R - Non-Replicable GRR Case Study


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
gage r&r (repeatability and reproducibility), torque meter, torque wrench
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 10th June 2003, 09:46 AM
ksanders

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Let Me Help You Torque Gauge R&R - Non-Replicable GRR Case Study

We have an operation that torque's an assembly together. The machine is equipped with a nutrunner torque wrench which monitors and collect the torque readings. We are being asked by our customer to provide R&R results from this process. In the past, we have just supplied the calibration cert, and that has been sufficient, but times are a-chang'in. With torque being a non-replicating feature, we are strugling with which approach is "acceptable" for evaluation.

Based on other reading from this site, the most consistent suggestion has been Nested ANOVA. I consider myself to be an above average statistician, but must confess, I don't have the slightest ideas how to preform this study. Can anyone offer some help? I have minitab, which has this feature. I just need help in organizing the study and collecting the correct data.

Has anyone found what they would consider to be the "acceptable" method for this type of study? Maybe this is one that needs to be addressed with AIAG and singled out for a clarification from the standard body.

Any comments are appreciated.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 10th June 2003, 01:26 PM
Atul Khandekar's Avatar
Atul Khandekar

 
 
Total Posts: 1,457
ksanders,

Welcome to the Cove!

Here is a white paper (pdf format) from AIAG you may find useful:

***DEAD LINK REMOVED***

Last edited by Marc; 16th February 2013 at 06:40 AM. Reason: Dead link removed.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 10th June 2003, 01:54 PM
ksanders

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Thanks for the info. I've conducted some taguchi studies in the past, and, at a glance, this looks kind of like the same thing. I'll take some time to review and give it a go.
  Post Number #4  
Old 11th June 2003, 04:01 PM
ksanders

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Results for Comments

Attached find the results of the nested ANOVA, which shows a Total Gage R&R of 5.48% of Tolerance. My question is with the XChart by Operator. The white paper, as well as the Wheeler book, state that at least 50% of the average values should be out of control. In my case, they were all in control. In addition, on the summary results was the statement that there were zero distinct catagories.

I have to admit that the data used to analyze this process was taken consectively from the process (90 consec. readings), and plugged into the ANOVA. The white paper recommended taking consecutive part samples from various lots to simulate repetative readings on the same part, however, based on our statistical data, very little variation exists from lot to lot (CPK=20.0), so my assumption was that waiting on different lots of bolts / nuts was only going to be a waist of time.

Can the results seen on both the summary and the XChart for Operators be attributed to the means for collecting the samples, or to the fact that the process is extremely capable? Additionally, would you consider this GRR acceptable if it was accompanied with the capability data as supporting evidence that the process is (1) capable enough that there is no need for a GRR in the first place, or (2) further proof that gage capability is not in question for this process?
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: doc nested gage r&r results.doc (118.5 KB, 435 views)
  Post Number #5  
Old 3rd July 2003, 08:48 AM
Charles

 
 
Total Posts: 3
ksanders

Hi - you'll see from my post that we face similar issues.

I have chosen not to get embroiled with ANOVA, as it seems that a simple X-bar / R chart, summary stats and capability study (e.g. Cpk) do enough to answer the question whether the wrench is up to the job. I am open to other ideas tho !!

Charles
  Post Number #6  
Old 16th February 2013, 02:16 AM
LUV-d-4UM

 
 
Total Posts: 679
Re: Results for Comments

I am in the same situation as you are. So we just do the X bar and R chart plus Cpk for the test method that follows the ASTM method.
Thanks to LUV-d-4UM for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis)

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How do you perform a S3 Stability Study for a Non-Replicable Measurement System John SB Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1 15th November 2013 06:01 AM
Should we immediately have recalibrated our Digital Torque Gauge? Izoyd IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 15th February 2013 09:13 AM
Gage R&R for Torque Device (Non - Replicable Measurement Systems) Rubenespinosasalinas Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3 5th February 2011 02:09 PM
Norm for Acceptance Calibration Results Torque Gauge and /or Dynamometers Crombes General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5 22nd October 2009 10:44 AM
MSA - Gage R&R Study Analysis - SAMPLE - Case Study ZeeTX Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 20 8th June 2006 08:43 PM



The time now is 06:21 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"