The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Manager and Management Related Issues
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

QA and only QA, or Jack of all Duties? Crossing Departmental Boundaries


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
company divisional differences, quality assurance (qa), responsibilities
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 28th February 2017, 04:24 PM
normzone

 
 
Total Posts: 618
Question QA and only QA, or Jack of all Duties? Crossing Departmental Boundaries

In my early training in the Quality field, one of my instructors stressed that we should always do QA/QC, and only QA/QC, else we find ourselves going down a path that ends to failing in your Quality duties.

His theory was once you go down the road of doing something that another department rightfully owns, then there will never be an end to the non Q duties you will be assigned. Inevitably you will fail at something, and it's only a question of whether you fail at your Q duties or the non-Q duties.

I just crossed the line ( I was pushed! )and now have some non Q responsibility. Traditionally I'd view the tasks as the responsibilities of Design Engineering and Technical Writer.

I know we all work in a "many hats" world, but I'd be interested in your opinions regarding this outlook.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 28th February 2017, 04:46 PM
Duke Okes

 
 
Total Posts: 835
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

I remember a workshop I attended one time where the instructor said "all boundaries are arbitrary.". For example, I've never seen those lines on the map when I was walking across the earth and went from one state to another.

So it all depends...does crossing the boundary create a conflict due to knowledge, independence, etc.? Certainly in a small organization there are many fewer narrow job functions.
Thank You to Duke Okes for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 28th February 2017, 04:47 PM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,027
Look! Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

You can be rigid, or you can be relevant to the needs of the business.

Quality is one of those functions that are usually perceived as a non-value added expense. As such, you are a target every time there are economic downturns.

On the other hand, you can look for ways to bring value to your organization beyond the QA/QC. Market the continual improvement aspect and bring actual value by permanently eliminating problems, preventing new problems.

You do want to avoid taking on garbage roles that no one else wants, but if you refuse to take on any new roles with your existing company, you may find yourself in a new role in a new company.

Always look for ways to remain relevant to your companies needs.
Thank You to Miner for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 28th February 2017, 05:43 PM
normzone

 
 
Total Posts: 618
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

[Duke Okes] - No conflicts of interest, just increased caseload. And we are a small organization.

[Miner] - You're spot on about the perception of Quality as non-value added expense. I've always said that my job is "problem prevention, problem solving, figuring out whose problem it really is".

And the two tasks are not garbage, or I would have balked. They reflect customer requests for technical documents that crop up periodically.

And they offered me additional money to do it, so my grounds for complaint are extremely limited. It just feels weird after avoiding crossing that "arbitrary boundary" for so many years. It's reassuring that you guys are not selecting the flowers for my memorial service yet.
  Post Number #5  
Old 28th February 2017, 05:58 PM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 4,690
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

Well, look at ISO 9001:2015. It actually includes things like:
"The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction..."
"...ensuring the integration of the quality management system requirements into the organizationís business processes..."
"...shall review the organization's quality management system, at planned intervals, to ensure... alignment with the strategic direction of the organization."

The quality system is (and always should have been) integrated with the business. The fact is that everyone in the company should have a quality hat that they wear while they do their regular duties.
Thank You to howste for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 28th February 2017, 06:37 PM
PaulJSmith's Avatar
PaulJSmith

 
 
Total Posts: 563
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

I completely understand your reservations, normzone. I've always tried to maintain that purity as well ... and in most cases eventually failed. Only when I worked for a huge aerospace company did I not have to cross that proverbial line in the sand. All of the other positions with small- to medium-size companies inevitably ended up getting blurred with non-quality-related duties. It's just a fact of life in small-ish organizations. It hasn't happened yet here at the new place, but I know it will.

Miner's post pretty much nails it.
Thanks to PaulJSmith for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 1st March 2017, 12:07 AM
Mark Meer

 
 
Total Posts: 595
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all Duties? Crossing Departmental Boundaries

Great topic of discussion!

Nerd alert: As someone who played a lot of role-playing games (RPGs) when I was younger, one thing I learned is that the best outcomes comes from specialization. Be it an individual focusing on mastering a particular discipline, or a team of specialists - things generally progress faster, and more efficiently.

That being said, the jack-of-all-trades approach is often more fun, and personally rewarding.

As someone working for a small organization, I wear a lot of hats. But this, to me, is what makes the job interesting, and also allows me to feel more "connected" to the company, as my responsibilities span multiple processes at a level deeper than just quality.
I also find it personally fulfilling, as I can develop (albeit not specialize) several skill sets. This makes it an atmosphere of continual learning and personal development, which is always a good thing.

Bottom line (IMHO):
- What's best for the company: probably specialization
- What's best for individuals: continual broadening of skills

MM.
Thank You to Mark Meer for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 1st March 2017, 05:06 AM
somashekar's Avatar
somashekar

 
 
Total Posts: 5,216
Re: QA and only QA, or Jack of all duties?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by normzone View Post

[Duke Okes] - No conflicts of interest, just increased caseload. And we are a small organization.

[Miner] - You're spot on about the perception of Quality as non-value added expense. I've always said that my job is "problem prevention, problem solving, figuring out whose problem it really is".

And the two tasks are not garbage, or I would have balked. They reflect customer requests for technical documents that crop up periodically.

And they offered me additional money to do it, so my grounds for complaint are extremely limited. It just feels weird after avoiding crossing that "arbitrary boundary" for so many years. It's reassuring that you guys are not selecting the flowers for my memorial service yet.
Just be a part of the solution under any given role. The solution provided must have the inbuilt quality aspect and here you will weigh more. Good Luck.
Thanks to somashekar for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Manager and Management Related Issues

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
API Specification Q1 for Pump Jack djoskula Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1 3rd September 2012 08:57 AM
Crossing from OHSAS 18001 to ILO OSH hboussed Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 11 25th March 2012 11:22 AM
You don't know Jack Al Rosen YouTube and Videos Forum 0 17th April 2009 11:22 PM
MCA calculation - problem with Cm Cmk and boundaries fcelka Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1 4th March 2009 12:57 PM
Creating Swim Lanes to document where processes cross functional boundaries TheyGaveMeTheQ ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8 12th May 2008 12:12 PM



The time now is 11:43 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" - A Peachfarm Internet Property