The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Clarification on Calibration/Verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d (IATF 16949)


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags (Not all threads are Tagged)
calibration (general topics), calibration reports and certificates, records (evidence) and records control
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 19th May 2017, 03:15 PM
mans442

 
 
Total Posts: 1
Thank You! Clarification on Calibration/Verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d (IATF 16949)

As it states:
d) when a piece of inspection measurement and test equipment is found to be out of calibration or defective during its planned verification or calibration or during its use, documented information on the validity of previous measurement results obtained with this piece of of inspection measurement and test equipment shall be retained, include the associated standard's last calibration date and the next due date on the calibration report;

Does this mean that if, we find a gage out of calibration or defective during a planned calibration check or during normal use, we need to maintain the last calibration record of the now defective gage back to when it was in calibration?

Thanks,
Jason

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 19th May 2017, 03:41 PM
Sunday's Avatar
Sunday

 
 
Total Posts: 40
Re: Clarification on Calibration/verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d

An effective calibration program should already have the last date of calibration (last known good date). If a piece of measurement equipment is found to be out of calibration, an investigation should be performed to determine the risk to outgoing product. This investigation should include an analysis of the time at which it may have gone out of calibration, the quantity of material affected, and the severity of the erroneous measurements. I recommend documenting this information with the calibration records including any adjustments that were performed on the tool to return it to good working order. An assessment should be made if product must be recalled as a result of the erroneous measurements (in the most severe cases). You could use your corrective action system as a good way of documenting this information, in the absence of a good asset tracking database.
Thank You to Sunday for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 19th May 2017, 03:47 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 25,678
Re: Clarification on Calibration/verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d

Just to be clear - What standard are you referring to?
  Post Number #4  
Old 22nd May 2017, 12:02 AM
dgriffith

 
 
Total Posts: 228
Re: Clarification on Calibration/Verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d

For AS9100C(now D), our entire org is under that umbrella. Whether the out of tolerance/non-conforming asset belongs to the lab or the customer, we (the org) are required to report the OOT and research all measurements/results to determine if there was any impact on those measurements. If the customer, it is incumbent on them to figure out what to do once notified.
The lab would do the same, but it becomes a problem when a standard has calibrated dozens if not hundreds of customer assets, which may need to be recalled.
Whether AS9100 or 17025, if your lab equipment, you need to keep a record of this verification process and the results of any investigation.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 "Calibration/verification records" Interpretation Peters IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 20th May 2017 12:46 AM
Calibration/Verification Records - IATF 16949 section 7.1.5.2.1 f) bkirch IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 18th April 2017 08:38 AM
TS-16949 7.6.2 ? Calibration/Verification Records - Assessment of the Impact GoKats78 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 18th March 2013 06:33 PM
Calibration and Verification Records - TS 16949 Clause 7.6.2 kat.k. General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8 19th September 2010 09:25 PM
TS 16949 Clause 7.6.2 Calibration Verification Records Sue Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 7 7th November 2002 05:40 AM



The time now is 05:16 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"