The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
anova (analysis of variance), taguchi designs and analysis
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th April 2014, 10:10 AM
mrbhala

 
 
Total Posts: 12
Question ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

I am testing paint Film Adhesion. Measuring it in % of portions are peeled off in a test.

When I am saying the quality of paint in terms of Film adhesion, I have to say % of portions NOT peeled off. So % NOT peeled off = 100 - % of Peeled off.

While doing Taguchi analysis
For the first category (% peeled off) I am taking "Smaller is better"
Also I am trying it
for the Second (% NOT peeled off) I am taking "Larger is better"

The results of Analysis of variance
for Means both (peeled off, Not peeled off) gives same R sqr, Adj R sqr and F values
but for S/N Ratio both gives different R Sqr, Adj R Sqr, and F values

Can anyone please explain me Why it is so?

PS: I have attached the data and results.

Thanks
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before opening, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: docx Comparison of Adhesion results.docx (13.0 KB, 24 views)

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 4th April 2014, 10:30 AM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,124
Look! Re: ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

Although you have asked several questions, most can be boiled down to one simple reason. None of your factors are statistically significant (i.e., all p-values >> 0.05). This makes all other numbers irrelevant.

Also, a number of noted statisticians have identified major flaws with the use of S/N Ratios and recommend analyzing the mean and the Ln(StDev) separately. S/N Ratios behave in a non-linear fashion, which can cause the exact problem which you have seen. The Smaller the Better version increases rapidly at first then plateaus. The Larger the Better version increases slowly at first then rises rapidly.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 4th April 2014, 10:55 AM
mrbhala

 
 
Total Posts: 12
Re: ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

Thank you Miner.
Yes the factors don't have significant influence on the response variables. Actually I am testing 4 variables, out of which 2 are being influenced.

I have question here. I am also done the Gray relational analysis in which for its grades, I did ANOVA. even though the P values are not < 0.05, my guide said I can interpret how much each factor influencing based on the F-Ratio. Is it right?
  Post Number #4  
Old 4th April 2014, 11:20 AM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,124
Look! Re: ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

You can do that PROVIDED that the factors being compared are statistically significant at your designated Alpha risk. I do not recommend doing that with factors that are not statistically significant because you have not disproved the null hypothesis of no effect.
  Post Number #5  
Old 19th September 2017, 11:58 PM
yasir ishraq

 
 
Total Posts: 2
Re: ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Miner View Post

Although you have asked several questions, most can be boiled down to one simple reason. None of your factors are statistically significant (i.e., all p-values >> 0.05). This makes all other numbers irrelevant.

Also, a number of noted statisticians have identified major flaws with the use of S/N Ratios and recommend analyzing the mean and the Ln(StDev) separately. S/N Ratios behave in a non-linear fashion, which can cause the exact problem which you have seen. The Smaller the Better version increases rapidly at first then plateaus. The Larger the Better version increases slowly at first then rises rapidly.
Dear Miner
your post is help full. i have same issue but the mean and SNR give different ranking. i have same insignificant value issue. but my study purpose is to find percentage of contribution only. the two Graphs should be overlapping each other as done in most of the studies.
can you please help.
  Post Number #6  
Old 20th September 2017, 10:09 AM
Miner's Avatar
Miner

 
 
Total Posts: 4,124
Look! Re: ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results

If your factors are not significant, there is no contribution, it is 100% noise.
Thanks to Miner for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Strange PT Ratio on an Excel spreadsheet for variable GRR ANOVA Method stefano.larghi Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 2 2nd March 2012 04:47 AM
Generic question regarding Two Way ANOVA Results optomist1 Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8 24th February 2011 12:50 PM
Study Variation and Discrimination Ratio in Gage R&R ANOVA Brad Gover - 2010 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7 5th January 2010 02:37 PM
ANOVA / X Bar R Results are different - Why is the difference is so great? markzanna Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7 9th September 2009 09:54 PM
P/T (Precision/Tolerance) ratio for off-center processes? Process capability ratio? Strife Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3 24th June 2007 05:46 PM



The time now is 11:41 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"