The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device


Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links




Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
510(k), class ii medical device, software medical devices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 20th December 2016, 03:27 PM
keldez

 
 
Total Posts: 35
Please Help! 510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device

Let's say, hypothetically, that I have a possible client that's had a Class II software device on the market for 5+ years without any 510k/FDA knowledge. What would you say are the appropriate initial steps to get this product in compliance in terms of 510k/registering company and device?
Would a Premarket Submission still be the most advised initial step, and from that point navigate FDA response?
FYI/FWIW, the device is extremely low risk.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 20th December 2016, 08:02 PM
Ronen E

 
 
Total Posts: 3,736
Re: 510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by keldez View Post

What would you say are the appropriate initial steps...
Coming clean?... Otherwise they'd have to continuously "hide" it and worry about what will happen when the FDA finds out.
Thank You to Ronen E for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #3  
Old 21st December 2016, 10:52 AM
Sarah Stec

 
 
Total Posts: 88
Re: 510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device

I agree that carefully coming clean may be a good idea. Before you do that, it may be a good idea to make the analysis as to why the device was on the market, and for so long, before anyone realized it had to be cleared by FDA, and what you plan on doing while FDA reviews the 510(k). Internally, you may also want to figure out what you plan to do if you need to make changes in order to receive your clearance, and come up with a working rationale in case you need it.

And then prepare your premarket notification submission (your 510(k)).

Thanks to Sarah Stec for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 3rd January 2017, 02:27 PM
mihzago

 
 
Total Posts: 190
Re: 510k "Premarket" Submission for Existing Class II Software Medical Device

just to add another penny to Sarah's two, once you make the assessment as to why the device was not cleared prior to marketing, prepare a response in case office of compliance contacts you before or during your submission.

Also, be careful about including real-world use data as part of your device validation. While it's good to show positive results (e.g. low defect rate, low complaint rate, no adverse events, etc.) from actual usage, you don't want to brag to the agency that your product was on the market.

In general, you have a much better chance of avoiding enforcement action when you take steps to comply than when you plead ignorance.
Thank You to mihzago for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Use of a "Priority existing chemical" in medical device in Australia Mike Blanc Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1 8th February 2015 03:23 AM
510k Submission - Class II Software communicates with a Non-Classified Device tebusse 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5 8th March 2013 12:21 PM
Labelling for 510K submission for a Class II medical device - suture passer ElmerF 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3 17th October 2012 01:16 PM
510k submission for class II medical device leroybrown 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6 16th October 2009 04:36 PM
510k Submission Samples - Class II Medical Device - Knee Joint Prosthesis evilchilli_420 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2 16th October 2009 03:34 PM



The time now is 05:09 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"
The Elsmar Cove web site and all content is owned by Rabbithash Corp. as of 1 MAY 2018.
Unlike Facebook and other properties such as Linkedin, We don't buy, sell, or "share" visitor information. Never have, Never will...
GDPR Compliant since 1996, keeping Marc's vision alive!