S
somerqc
Help.
I am trying to convince/teach the lead hands of the assembly areas that sample inspection can be equal to (and possibly more) accurate than 100% inspection.
I have been able to easily convince management that 100% inspection is NOT economical, but, the $$$$ argument does not work with the people on the floor.
I am also working to change a culture that spends as much time inspecting a $5 part as a $5000 part and think it is normal!!!! The culture change is occurring slowly, but surely.
Does anyone have any other tips besides the following for convincing them before using the hammer (which I truly HATE using!)?
1. Accuracy vs time (i.e. almost 100% accurate for 10-15% of the time)
2. Efficiency (i.e. don't need to use as many people)
3. Less wear and tear on them (i.e. inspecting 80 pcs is easier than 1000 pcs)
Hoping to not use the
I am trying to convince/teach the lead hands of the assembly areas that sample inspection can be equal to (and possibly more) accurate than 100% inspection.
I have been able to easily convince management that 100% inspection is NOT economical, but, the $$$$ argument does not work with the people on the floor.
I am also working to change a culture that spends as much time inspecting a $5 part as a $5000 part and think it is normal!!!! The culture change is occurring slowly, but surely.
Does anyone have any other tips besides the following for convincing them before using the hammer (which I truly HATE using!)?
1. Accuracy vs time (i.e. almost 100% accurate for 10-15% of the time)
2. Efficiency (i.e. don't need to use as many people)
3. Less wear and tear on them (i.e. inspecting 80 pcs is easier than 1000 pcs)
Hoping to not use the