|
|
|
From a misc.industry.quality
NG posting:
|
|
The problem lies in
assigning equal titles and definitions to every company in the world, which
cannot be done. In some
companies, a "Managing Director" may be a second tier position; in
others, "top management" for the facility undergoing ISO
registration may be the Plant Manager, as in the case of a large corporation
with multiple sites with various certifications, where the CEO might be so
far removed (logically and physically) from that site he plays no role. If my company is a small 12-person software development wing
of Microsoft located in Tennessee, is Bill Gates "top management"? Of course not. (Microsoft jokes to follow....)
|
|
|
|
One of my clients has
empowered divisional VP's as "top management" even though the
President/CEO is headquartered out of the same site; however the practical
reality is that the President's role in this company requires constant
international travel and macro management, so it's not practical to have him
overseeing the quality system on a regular basis. Quality managers report, during management review, to the
VP's, who make all the usual "top management" decisions. A report is sent annually to the
President, but no action on his part is required.
|