J
jfbock
Simple question.
When doing ppaps or for that matter any inspection report and you have for example a true position of xx and it calculates out to be .32, but the bonus tolerance (through MMC) is .5, relegating it to 'zero', is that what is documented on an inspection report or is it normal to include detail on how it got to be zero? This is what I've done in the past but I am doing a ppap right now to which there is a bounty of tolerance because of this issue so I am recorded 0,0,0,0,.... for these true positions. I say this only because it looks kind of peculiar, like maybe it was forced.
When doing ppaps or for that matter any inspection report and you have for example a true position of xx and it calculates out to be .32, but the bonus tolerance (through MMC) is .5, relegating it to 'zero', is that what is documented on an inspection report or is it normal to include detail on how it got to be zero? This is what I've done in the past but I am doing a ppap right now to which there is a bounty of tolerance because of this issue so I am recorded 0,0,0,0,.... for these true positions. I say this only because it looks kind of peculiar, like maybe it was forced.