T
Thompbl
I am interested knowing how deep other auditors go when reviewing/auditing FAIRs and Delta FAIRs.
C
ChoctawChuck
I would confirm that the revision is correctly noted, that all the dimensions are within the tolerance on the drawing/specification (have found more than once that the inspector accepted an oot condition); and that all notes and other requirements on the drwing have been verified.
Mikishots
Trusted Information Resource
The list I use:
-The actual configuration: drawing(s) and planning document(s) including revision level.
-List of all detail parts, hardware, and raw materials used.
-Acceptance or Function Test Procedure results.
-The specific tool and/or fixture numbers used in manufacture.
-Special processes used (specification, type, and class).
-Required dimensions, tolerances, and actual results (including any general drawing note requirements).
-All sub-tier supplier C of C’s and test reports.
-Raw material alloy, specification, and temper.
-Raw material traceability documents.
-Raw material hardness and conductivity values (metallic component only).
-Shelf-life statement.
No blanks are permitted on the AS9102 forms. If a field is not applicable for a given inspection article, “N/A” or a similar notation must be used. No erasures or removal of original entries are permitted. If you must make corrections, draw a line across the data to be corrected, stamp or sign and date the changes.
T
Thompbl
Do any of you review the manufacturing plans to verify materials used are accounted for on Form 2 as well as measurements recorded accurately on Form 3?
Please let us know which kind of auditor you are making a reference to...
Customer, 2nd party (internal) or 3rd party auditor
T
Thompbl
In this case I am wanting to know for prime contractor reviewing subs and customer reviewing prime contractor.
Similar threads
