I read draft more or less briefly yesterday evening.
1. It is good that AIAG have supported approach "Automotive industry for incompetent" and next manual is more literal than previous one. This is automotive reality and we can observe it here too.
2. It is very bad that special characteristics were removed from DFMEA. Is this related to lack of designers' knowledge how part they design are assembled, functioning and therefore assigning all responsibility to manufacturing plants, they are carrying anyway?
Yeah!!! Who should know it first and share his(her) knowledge? PFMEA team?? Oh really?? What is a benefit from saving few seconds job related to putting SC symbol in DFMEA?
I hope you get my point and I kindly ask native English speaker for giving their feedback to AIAG regarding this matter.
1. It is good that AIAG have supported approach "Automotive industry for incompetent" and next manual is more literal than previous one. This is automotive reality and we can observe it here too.
2. It is very bad that special characteristics were removed from DFMEA. Is this related to lack of designers' knowledge how part they design are assembled, functioning and therefore assigning all responsibility to manufacturing plants, they are carrying anyway?
A1.1 Special Characteristics said:In the case of noncompliance, characteristics which lead directly to a failure effect of product functions in regard to safety, fit, function, performance, further processing of the product, or compliance to government regulations and industry standards may be identified as Special Characteristics.
Yeah!!! Who should know it first and share his(her) knowledge? PFMEA team?? Oh really?? What is a benefit from saving few seconds job related to putting SC symbol in DFMEA?
I hope you get my point and I kindly ask native English speaker for giving their feedback to AIAG regarding this matter.
Last edited: