qualprod
Trusted Information Resource
Hello everybody
Why the standard added a new clause 7.1.6 to address something what is been considered in the past?
The knowledge, normally which was identified as value , was integrated to procedures, job descriptions, training, etc.
The same way, when a "lesson learned" (something good or bad) was detected, turned in a corrective action or in an improvement, which finally were integrated into the management system.
Needs for new training were also addressed.
So Lesson learned , IMHO shouldn´t be mentioned as additional actions to what existed in the standard.
or why have to be considered in a different way?
What is your perception in this issue?, dont you think that lesson learned is what we were doing in 2008 version?
Please give your comments
Why the standard added a new clause 7.1.6 to address something what is been considered in the past?
The knowledge, normally which was identified as value , was integrated to procedures, job descriptions, training, etc.
The same way, when a "lesson learned" (something good or bad) was detected, turned in a corrective action or in an improvement, which finally were integrated into the management system.
Needs for new training were also addressed.
So Lesson learned , IMHO shouldn´t be mentioned as additional actions to what existed in the standard.
or why have to be considered in a different way?
What is your perception in this issue?, dont you think that lesson learned is what we were doing in 2008 version?
Please give your comments