Definition Shall vs. Should - Definitions - Interpretation of "shall" and "should"

J

John Martinez

Re: Shall vs. Should - Definitions - Interpertation of "shall" and "should"

I don't understand why certain fallacies don't get challenged. The following is part of the requirements from ISO 9001:2000, as it relates to a management representative position:
The 4th edition of ISO 9001 stipulates
So, and again, I contend there are no differences, much less significant differences. From where I sit, the addition of the two words "the organization's" does not change anything. Just attempts to clarify the requirement.

Sorry, I though I had stated "while not a Big difference" which means....er....not a big change. I do not see where we disagree.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
Re: Shall vs. Should - Definitions - Interpertation of "shall" and "should"

I do not see where we disagree.
Sorry, John, but I think we have to be pragmatic. A previous poster had mentioned that there were SIGNIFICANT differences. You mentioned not big differences/changes, which means there were small changes.

As I said, in my viewpoint, there are NO changes. The two added words don't change anything.

Some people (not you) still try to sell the idea there are differences between ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:2008 so they can "sell" their services to unsuspecting fools customers.
 

Bubba

Involved In Discussions
In our quality manual we have spelled out the difference between the words.
Shall = a requirement that must be met
Should = an option with an organizational preference (If it isn't met, a rationale is documented)
May = an option without any preference
 
S

samsung

Re: Shall vs. Should - Definitions - Interpertation of "shall" and "should"

Difference between 'Shall' and 'Should' is clarified in ISO TC 176-526 (page # 8).

Please also refer ISO Directives Part 3:1997, Annex E (page # 47)
 

Attachments

  • TC176-526.pdf
    141.5 KB · Views: 115
  • isodir3 Annex E page 47-48.pdf
    12.9 KB · Views: 108
Top Bottom