21 CFR 820 vs 21CFR820 vs 21 CFR Part 820

MissTSmith

Starting to get Involved
Hi,
I'm updating a Quality Manual and the associated SOPs.
I noticed inconsistencies, sometimes even within a document (i.e. 2 or 3 pages) where I see:
  • 21 CFR 820
  • 21CFR820
  • 21 CFR Part 820
  • 21CFR 820
So, is there a standard for this? The above is just an example...I'm finding when I go into Google I might get no results for "21CFR123" but do get results for "21 CFR 123"...but the next search of "21CFR555" gives me results but "21 CFR 555" gives me nothing...

Thanks.:modcop:
 
Last edited:

monoj mon

Trusted Information Resource
I don't think this should be a matter of concern, unless you write the numbers wrong. Grab any random 510(k) summary and you will see that even FDA itself is not concerned about it. Just write it in your documents so that everyone can understand.
but the next search of "21CFR555" gives me results but "21 CFR 555" gives me nothing
By the way, I don't think there is any 21 CFR Part 555! It simply doesn't exists, that's why you aren't getting any search result. Check here
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21.
 

Ajit Basrur

Leader
Admin
Hi,
I'm updating a Quality Manual and the associated SOPs.
I noticed inconsistencies, sometimes even within a document (i.e. 2 or 3 pages) where I see:
  • 21 CFR 820
  • 21CFR820
  • 21 CFR Part 820
  • 21CFR 820
So, is there a standard for this? The above is just an example...I'm finding when I go into Google I might get no results for "21CFR123" but do get results for "21 CFR 123"...but the next search of "21CFR555" gives me results but "21 CFR 555" gives me nothing...

Thanks.:modcop:

Its like call a rose by any other name and it would smell as sweet :)

Tagin is correct but its not a concern the way you described your four bullets. To add some spice, here is the fifth one as a "section mark" symbol, 21 CFR § 820.60
 
Top Bottom