3D Math Data, GD&T and FAI - My issue lies more with Profiles

S

satsoe

#41
Roundness question

Hello All,
I might be dumb with this question?, but anyways it is better to ask rather being silent? I have a roudness callout of .0013(mm) in our print and supplier provides a result of .00039. I was told this dimension is out of print. Could somebody explain the logic behind this?. I am under impression smaller is better?

Appreciate your reply!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#42
Re: Roundness question

Hello All,
I might be dumb with this question?, but anyways it is better to ask rather being silent? I have a roudness callout of .0013(mm) in our print and supplier provides a result of .00039. I was told this dimension is out of print. Could somebody explain the logic behind this?. I am under impression smaller is better?

Appreciate your reply!
Before getting wrapped up in the numbers, is your and your supplier's interpretation of "roundness" or circularity the same? ASME Y14.5M-1994 Par 6.4.3.1 (page 162) defines the circularity tolerance zone as the radial distance between concentric circles.

Also the method of measurement may have an impact.

Just some thoughts....

Stijloor.
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#44
Re: Roundness question

Hello All,
I might be dumb with this question?, but anyways it is better to ask rather being silent? I have a roudness callout of .0013(mm) in our print and supplier provides a result of .00039. I was told this dimension is out of print. Could somebody explain the logic behind this?. I am under impression smaller is better?

Appreciate your reply!
Is the supplier's result in mm or in inches? If in inches, it is out of spec.
 
S

seamus26

#45
This is an old thread, but I'm in the midst of a discussion about reporting profile per ASME standard, and for the life of my I can't find anything.

My issue is this. Say you have a profile tolerance of .010. You have min max readings within the profile of +.007 and -.004. Nobody disagrees that this part is out, but by how much? Apparently - and I quote another forum - according to ASME :

Note that no single actual value may be calculated for comparison to the tolerance value in the feature control frame, except in case of unilateral profile tolerances.
Conventional wisdom has always told me to double the worst case reading (either + or - material) giving this part a profile of .014. Or is it? This is in keeping with ISO, which apparently says :

Bi-lateral and unequally disposed profile tolerances have a single actual value that can be compared to
the tolerance in the feature control frame to make a conformance decision. Single actual value =
largest deviation (amongst plus and minus material directions) x two.
Using the doubling method I am OOT by .004 (.014-.010). Or, if profile of .010 is the same as BASIC ±.005, does my .007 put me OOT by only .002 (.007-.005)?

If someone has some clear direction from Y 14.5, please share. This could be important when explaining my results.

TIA
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#46
This is an old thread, but I'm in the midst of a discussion about reporting profile per ASME standard, and for the life of my I can't find anything.

My issue is this. Say you have a profile tolerance of .010. You have min max readings within the profile of +.007 and -.004. Nobody disagrees that this part is out, but by how much? Apparently - and I quote another forum - according to ASME :

Conventional wisdom has always told me to double the worst case reading (either + or - material) giving this part a profile of .014. Or is it? This is in keeping with ISO, which apparently says :

Using the doubling method I am OOT by .004 (.014-.010). Or, if profile of .010 is the same as BASIC ±.005, does my .007 put me OOT by only .002 (.007-.005)?

If someone has some clear direction from Y 14.5, please share. This could be important when explaining my results.

TIA
You have a profile tolerance of .010. The default interpretation for profile per ASME Y14.5M-1994 and ASME Y14.5-2009 is that the tolerance zone is "equally disposed about true profile." The permitted deviations are .005 above true profile and .005 under true profile. Because one deviation is .007 above true profile, you are out of tolerance (OOT) by .002.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M FDA 21 CFR 820.250 - Does "valid statistical" always mean math? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
Stijloor "We hate Math!" Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 11
N Basic Math Problem - Finding in between Values General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
D The Math compared to the 6 Sigma Texts Six Sigma 6
michellemmm New look at math Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
Ajit Basrur Math problem Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
D ANSI Z540-3 Risk Analysis - How to do the math for risk analysis General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
A Basic Math training - I.e. fractions converting from inches to mm, etc. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
E Daughter needs help with this Math Problem Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 10
J Calculation/math to find 1.33 Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 15
B Creative Solutions - Math Geeks Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 4
J Converting torque to pressure - One for the Math Folks Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
L Quiz for basic math skills wanted Career and Occupation Discussions 10
Wes Bucey For statisticians and "new math" folks only! Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 7
L Math Instruction Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1
J Need Help with FPY Data in Assembly Process Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Q AMS 2750 E or F Continuous Furnace TUS Data Collection AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Reduce occurrence rating based on the PMS data and customer complaint data ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
J Customer Complaint & SCAR, false data Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
Brizilla Employee Data Privacy Policy - ISO 9001:2015 requirement(s)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
D Safety data sheets software REACH and RoHS Conversations 2
M Data Protection and Privacy Policy - looking for a template/example EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Non parametric test for semi-quantitative data. Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
M Disabling measurement data during fault conditions IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
C EU MDR - Annex II 6.1 Pre-clinical and clinical data EU Medical Device Regulations 4
P Ppk results shown as asterisk after the transformation of Non-normal data Using Minitab Software 4
lanley liao How to correctly understand the bullet list d) of 6.3 Analysis of Data for API Spec Q1 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 7
Steve Prevette Informational I am presenting a webinar Thursday - "Data Driven Decision Making" - 19 November 2020 Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
qualprod Best practice to ensure inputting of data in production Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 19
D Preservation of Electronic Data / Information Technology ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Comparing data from destructive testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
DuncanGibbons Technical Data Package vs Digital Product Definition APQP and PPAP 0
Z Putting back excluded rows/data points in a control chart Using Minitab Software 0
F General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 6
Z Minitab - Updating Graph with specific data points Using Minitab Software 2
E PEMS Hazards - IEC 60601 Clause 14.6 - Internal data use - Pressure sensor IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
K Transform variable data into attribute data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 24
R Clinical evaluation without clinical data - MDR Article 61(10) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
H Capability Data for Paint Thickness on Painted Parts Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
D BS EN 62304 - Medical-Relevant Data C.5 - Definition of IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
T Submitting MR Compatibility Data for 510(k) Cleared Device Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
S Quality manager considering data science Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 19
A What are Practical data center best practices IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 1
U Do we need clinical trial data for Class IIa medical device under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 7
S Average and standard deviation of Cumulative Data Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7, sub clause 7.11 Control of data and information management ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Watchcat CERs Literature Databases - Searching for data to evaluate EU Medical Device Regulations 16
D Transformation of Data Normality Failed Using Minitab Software 11
J Sample size for creating a data base as a reference to a tested variable Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 6
M GUDID data deficiency communication - IS THIS A SCAM? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 29

Similar threads

Top Bottom