4.10.6 Supplier laboratory requirements - applicability

P

Paul Morrow

#1
My thinking is that the intent of this requirement is to address in-house laboratories that verify product (otherwise why under 4.10). However is it applicable to a lab that is only concerened with process control, e.g. solution analysis, and performs no product verification whatsoever? I beleive so but would appreciate comment. Anyone queried this with their assessors yet?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#2
My interpretation is that a company lab which is concerened with process control (e.g. solution analysis, and performs no product verification whatsoever) is subject to 4.10.6 requirements (See 4.10.6.1).
 
F

Frank Cardillo

#3
Regarding 4.10.6, we do not have an in-house cal lab, a process control lab or a met lab. We maintain what we call a reliability lab containing temp and humidity chambers, temp cycling chambers and high temp soak chambers. We use this equipment to continually assess our manbufacturing processes. This activity is not a contract requirement. Is this lab subject to 4.10.6? If so what would you suggest would be the "laboratory scope"? If not, how do I address it in my quality manual?
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#4
Frank - my interpretation is you are subject to the requirement.

If you think about it, you stated the scope:

Reliability lab testing with temp and humidity chambers, temp cycling chambers and high temp soak chambers to continually assess our manbufacturing processes.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#5
I'm not sure what thread she was responding to, but I received this from a reader:

Nancy Foncannon wrote:

Subject: Wrong answer

Mark: As an auditor for ISO/QS and A2LA, the only tests that need to fall under 4.10.6 are those that are required for PPAP data. Process "Tests"(i.e. solution testing, pH for example) need not be included, as process solutions, are covered in 4.9(d) monitor and control of process parameters.

4.10 applies to inspection of product, incoming, in-process, and final. The intent of 4.10.6 is to verify that the tests defined in the Lab's Scope (right, lab determines the Scope, not the auditor) are subject to compliance with the 4 or 5 new requirements listed.

The purpose of evaluating lab tests is to determine the quality of DATA produced, regardless of how well (or poorly) the company's products perform during testing.

That is why GM requires (in Section II and PPAP manual) that PPAP data come from "accredited labs". The requirements of 4.10.6 represent only 25% of the full ISO/IEC Guide 25 requirements.

Hope this helps!

===============================>>>>>
\\ Nancy A. Foncannon
// Quality Systems Consulting, Inc.
\\ ISO 9000, QS-9000, AS 9000, & Guide 25
// Auditing, Training & Consulting
\\ RAB Lead Assessor, ASQ Fellow
//
===============================>>>>>

Folks - when I'm wrong or off base, you don't have to point it out, errrr... Ummm...

No - all kidding aside. I hope when I'm wrong or off base that you speak right up (type right up?) in a response. I'm still learning and sometimes I'm not thinking real clearly and sometimes I simply misunderstand.

Thanks for the 'heads up' Nancy! Your input is much appreciated! I hope you join in the fray more often!

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 01-27-99).]
 
G

Ganesh Chidambarakrishnan

#6
4.10.6 applies to all the testing done inside the supplier's premises, whether product testing or testing for process control purposes, as long as the testing is in relation to the product(s) falling under the QS9000 registration scope. Nowhere, neither in 4.10.6 nor in the glossary, laboratory is defined only for products.

Ganesh
 
L

Lyndon Diong

#7
The note at 4.10.6 says "Element 4.10.6 applies to supplier in-house lab facilities, not insp or testing performed outside of a lab facility." I take that to mean that not all testing done is considered "lab work". I am inclined to think that lab provides supporting services. E.g It provide highly accurate measurement or reliability test. Thus temp/humidity etc are tightly controlled. 4.10.6.3 seems to imply that the products are received by a supporting group. Any comment? P.S 4.10.6 is not applicable to Ford suppliers.
 
B

Batman

#8
Forgive the tardiness, but this just became an issue at my facility. I would appreciate specifics from the experts. We have part of two QA offices that contain test equipment such as hardness tester, Instron, indicators, laser mic, comparator, plating thickness, etc. We perform some testing for the manufacturing folks as tensile testing, hardness testing, some dimensional test for less frequent and sometimes important features. Almost all of the testing is of the final type - is the tensile strength up to the customer's requirements, etc. We take in no outside work. The information is mostly recorded; in a few instances the data is included with forms or certs as required by the customer. There is no specific humidity or temperature controls, other than the equipment shares the same environment as the offices, cold in the morning, hot in evening. It is not A2LA, or otherwise certified. Each piece of equipment is calibrated by the manufacturer on schedule - a schedule maintained by the gage guy - and are mostly used for infrequent small samples. From this description, is it considered a "Laborotory" with respect to 4.10.6, and as such does it need a scope, list of equipment?
 
B

Bryon C Simmons

#9
Well, having been there just a couple of weeks ago with our registrar, I would say that your "lab" IS subject to 4.10.6

The other thing......you mentioned the "lab guy". Make sure that ALL of your personnel that are making decisions in relation to testing and/or calibration, are qualified to do so, through education and experience, and make sure that those qualifications/experience are documented. Typically, this would be done in Human Resource records.

Be pragmatic about the "scope". I defined our lab scope in Level II documents. This was adequate.

Hope this helps.

Bryon
 
B

Batman

#10
Bryon, thanks. I am convinced. May I belabor the point a little further. At my facility, we have 6 areas that do "lab" type testing. Some are little areas off production areas, a couple are included in offices. Each is under different supervision - Engineering, production, QA, etc.- and for the most part each does tests different from others. Do I need 6 scopes?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.3.2 - External Laboratory Sub-Supplier Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Supplier Laboratory Requirements - 4.10.6 - Requirements for an In-House Laboratory QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
M Do we really need to meet the Supplier Laboratory Requirements (4.10.6)? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
L What is defined as a Laboratory? Supplier Laboratory Requirements - QS-9000 4.10.6 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
L Supplier Laboratory Requirements 4.10.6 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 38
G Audit & Agreements for "Test Laboratory" Supplier? US Medical Device Regulations 4
M Is Notification of the Test Laboratory always necessary for Supplier Changes? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 12
S Supplier Laboratory Assessments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M QS-9000 Section 4.10.6 Supplier Laboratory Requirement QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
Marc 4.10.6 - Calibration services are conducted by a supplier's laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
C Supplier Audit - Looking for a quality audit checklist General Auditing Discussions 3
L Supplier Performance when your supplier is also the customer ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
L Supplier performance evaluation Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
D Definition of Sub-supplier in chemicals IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Supplier File info for large (Microsoft) companies. Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
J Revamping Supplier Qualification, Re-evaluation, and Monitoring Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
J Outsourced Purchasing for Contract Manufacturing vs more typical/simple Supplier Management ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D "FAI" Requirements/Process for New Supplier Materials Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
T Stellantis supplier quality manual Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
G Use of Supplier's Corrective Action Form vs. Corporate Form Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
Stefan Mundt AS9100D Engineering sample purchases - Supplier not approved AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
S Supplier performance required to be reported to supplier? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P Homologation responsibilities as OEM supplier Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
S Non-approved supplier? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
Q 8.4.2.4 supplier monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Q IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
G Control of Approved Supplier List (ASL) When Employees Make Purchases Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
V Prototype for chemical supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Sortinghat Locating Customer Supplier Manuals Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
Q BMW Supplied Parts Quality Management -> Is there any new supplier quality manual? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
M Supplier Control for Unique Product ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C Process owner for Supplier Controls ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
L Unique Supplier Control Issue AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
D Supplier OTD Slip Due to Shipping Delays or Natural Disaster AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Evelyn7E The fastest way to get supplier to ship good parts to you Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
J Verification of purchased product / supplier questionnaires ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Question on Supplier Quality (SCAR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Z REACH: contradictory statement from supplier? REACH and RoHS Conversations 4
G How to implement H&S and Quality Control Requirements in Contract for Potential Supplier? Contract Review Process 6
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
K Why does load cell supplier requires force verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
S IATF 16949 Supplier selection criteria 8.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Supplier approved list - Notified body, regulatory body Supply Chain Security Management Systems 4
N Making improvements in supplier relationship last? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
K Supplier Qualification for Engineering Consultant? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
M Supplier evaluation Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
briteme4 ASL - AS9100 / Supplier Survey Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom