4.10.6 Supplier laboratory requirements - applicability

P

Paul Morrow

#1
My thinking is that the intent of this requirement is to address in-house laboratories that verify product (otherwise why under 4.10). However is it applicable to a lab that is only concerened with process control, e.g. solution analysis, and performs no product verification whatsoever? I beleive so but would appreciate comment. Anyone queried this with their assessors yet?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
My interpretation is that a company lab which is concerened with process control (e.g. solution analysis, and performs no product verification whatsoever) is subject to 4.10.6 requirements (See 4.10.6.1).
 
F

Frank Cardillo

#3
Regarding 4.10.6, we do not have an in-house cal lab, a process control lab or a met lab. We maintain what we call a reliability lab containing temp and humidity chambers, temp cycling chambers and high temp soak chambers. We use this equipment to continually assess our manbufacturing processes. This activity is not a contract requirement. Is this lab subject to 4.10.6? If so what would you suggest would be the "laboratory scope"? If not, how do I address it in my quality manual?
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
Frank - my interpretation is you are subject to the requirement.

If you think about it, you stated the scope:

Reliability lab testing with temp and humidity chambers, temp cycling chambers and high temp soak chambers to continually assess our manbufacturing processes.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#5
I'm not sure what thread she was responding to, but I received this from a reader:

Nancy Foncannon wrote:

Subject: Wrong answer

Mark: As an auditor for ISO/QS and A2LA, the only tests that need to fall under 4.10.6 are those that are required for PPAP data. Process "Tests"(i.e. solution testing, pH for example) need not be included, as process solutions, are covered in 4.9(d) monitor and control of process parameters.

4.10 applies to inspection of product, incoming, in-process, and final. The intent of 4.10.6 is to verify that the tests defined in the Lab's Scope (right, lab determines the Scope, not the auditor) are subject to compliance with the 4 or 5 new requirements listed.

The purpose of evaluating lab tests is to determine the quality of DATA produced, regardless of how well (or poorly) the company's products perform during testing.

That is why GM requires (in Section II and PPAP manual) that PPAP data come from "accredited labs". The requirements of 4.10.6 represent only 25% of the full ISO/IEC Guide 25 requirements.

Hope this helps!

===============================>>>>>
\\ Nancy A. Foncannon
// Quality Systems Consulting, Inc.
\\ ISO 9000, QS-9000, AS 9000, & Guide 25
// Auditing, Training & Consulting
\\ RAB Lead Assessor, ASQ Fellow
//
===============================>>>>>

Folks - when I'm wrong or off base, you don't have to point it out, errrr... Ummm...

No - all kidding aside. I hope when I'm wrong or off base that you speak right up (type right up?) in a response. I'm still learning and sometimes I'm not thinking real clearly and sometimes I simply misunderstand.

Thanks for the 'heads up' Nancy! Your input is much appreciated! I hope you join in the fray more often!

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 01-27-99).]
 
G

Ganesh Chidambarakrishnan

#6
4.10.6 applies to all the testing done inside the supplier's premises, whether product testing or testing for process control purposes, as long as the testing is in relation to the product(s) falling under the QS9000 registration scope. Nowhere, neither in 4.10.6 nor in the glossary, laboratory is defined only for products.

Ganesh
 
L

Lyndon Diong

#7
The note at 4.10.6 says "Element 4.10.6 applies to supplier in-house lab facilities, not insp or testing performed outside of a lab facility." I take that to mean that not all testing done is considered "lab work". I am inclined to think that lab provides supporting services. E.g It provide highly accurate measurement or reliability test. Thus temp/humidity etc are tightly controlled. 4.10.6.3 seems to imply that the products are received by a supporting group. Any comment? P.S 4.10.6 is not applicable to Ford suppliers.
 
B

Batman

#8
Forgive the tardiness, but this just became an issue at my facility. I would appreciate specifics from the experts. We have part of two QA offices that contain test equipment such as hardness tester, Instron, indicators, laser mic, comparator, plating thickness, etc. We perform some testing for the manufacturing folks as tensile testing, hardness testing, some dimensional test for less frequent and sometimes important features. Almost all of the testing is of the final type - is the tensile strength up to the customer's requirements, etc. We take in no outside work. The information is mostly recorded; in a few instances the data is included with forms or certs as required by the customer. There is no specific humidity or temperature controls, other than the equipment shares the same environment as the offices, cold in the morning, hot in evening. It is not A2LA, or otherwise certified. Each piece of equipment is calibrated by the manufacturer on schedule - a schedule maintained by the gage guy - and are mostly used for infrequent small samples. From this description, is it considered a "Laborotory" with respect to 4.10.6, and as such does it need a scope, list of equipment?
 
B

Bryon C Simmons

#9
Well, having been there just a couple of weeks ago with our registrar, I would say that your "lab" IS subject to 4.10.6

The other thing......you mentioned the "lab guy". Make sure that ALL of your personnel that are making decisions in relation to testing and/or calibration, are qualified to do so, through education and experience, and make sure that those qualifications/experience are documented. Typically, this would be done in Human Resource records.

Be pragmatic about the "scope". I defined our lab scope in Level II documents. This was adequate.

Hope this helps.

Bryon
 
B

Batman

#10
Bryon, thanks. I am convinced. May I belabor the point a little further. At my facility, we have 6 areas that do "lab" type testing. Some are little areas off production areas, a couple are included in offices. Each is under different supervision - Engineering, production, QA, etc.- and for the most part each does tests different from others. Do I need 6 scopes?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.3.2 - External Laboratory Sub-Supplier Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Supplier Laboratory Requirements - 4.10.6 - Requirements for an In-House Laboratory QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
M Do we really need to meet the Supplier Laboratory Requirements (4.10.6)? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
L What is defined as a Laboratory? Supplier Laboratory Requirements - QS-9000 4.10.6 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
L Supplier Laboratory Requirements 4.10.6 QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 38
M Is Notification of the Test Laboratory always necessary for Supplier Changes? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 12
S Supplier Laboratory Assessments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M QS-9000 Section 4.10.6 Supplier Laboratory Requirement QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
Marc 4.10.6 - Calibration services are conducted by a supplier's laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Approved supplier list for R&D ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M SemaTech SSQA Standardized Supplier Quality Assessment - my favorite tool ever Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
D Supplier Quality level category help - high level ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
J Supplier Controlled Shipping (GM CS1) Condition Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
L Supplier within the Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Supplier Quality - How to classify a supplier level Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
F Supplier Quality Assurance Job Openings - 8/2020 Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
P Understanding DFMEA and PFMEA - Supplier Related IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
S Can assembly manufacturing sub-supplier be certified IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M How Supplier Capacity check is done by competitors Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
C One Time Service Supplier - Temperature and Humidity Testing Service ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Supplier Audits - Stop Wasting Everyone's Time! General Auditing Discussions 15
G Supplier management when the supplier is your headquarter IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
V Supplier wants to perform pre-qualifications prior to every run instead of locking in parameters. Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
D Class 3 Device - Change of supplier of material Canada Medical Device Regulations 6
D List A IVD - Change to material supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Minimum Supplier Certifications for Food Supplements Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 3
R Supplier/Vendor Surveys (360) Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
was named killer AS9100 Supplier Approval Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
B AS9100 8.4.1 Supplier Selection/Evaluation criteria and reevaluations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
J Sub-supplier change from manual to automated process - same specs - Report to FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
M Supplier Audit Report - Template for second party audit wanted Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
T Difference between a subcontractor and a supplier ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
Ed Panek Corona Virus impact on Supplier Audits and Received Parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
NDesouza Verification of Supplier RCCAs Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
K Supply Agreement Regarding MDR 2017/745 - Manufacturer-supplier cooperation Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
L How to deal with an ISO 13485 Supplier Audit nonconformance ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
P Supplier Audits in the wake of COVID-19 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
T Ideas for developing a Supplier Quality Management System, non automotive ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
B Vendor (Supplier) Evaluations and Reports Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 11
F Is there such a thing as 'Critical supplier' status under the Dept. of Health (UK)? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
A MSA results differences - Supplier results vs. My results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
G Supplier flowdown verification of tests and revisions Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 0
B Supplier of design and manufacture process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
S Software for Supplier Charge back and internal PPM General Information Resources 2
R IATF/IAOB Red Supplier Pilot Program IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
M Changing supplier of critical raw material (III class device) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
S VW Supplier Product Safety Representative (PSB) upgrade to PSCR VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 4
S Process Map for Supplier Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
D Licensee as a Supplier on the ASL Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom