5.4.1 Thoughts

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
On 10/29/02 3:51 PM, Someone wrote:

> To satisfy the requirements of 5.4.1, a client of ours recently submitted
> the following:
>
> For example - Productions' quality objectives are:
>
> - Zero defects
> - 100% on-time deliveries
> - Customer Satisfaction
> - 100% efficiency
>
> 5.4.1 says, "The quality objectives shall be measurable and consistant
> with the quality policy"
>
> Our Quality Policy:
>
> - Customer satisfaction based on high quality, competitive pricing and
> 100% on-time delivery
> - Employee involvement with quality circles focused on continuous improvements
> - Providing our customers with reliable, durable and maintainable products
> - Providing our customers with technical support/services necessary to
> aid them in achieving their goals.
>
> 5.4.1 in its entirety states - "Top management shall ensure that quality
> objectives, including those needed to meet requirements for product (see
> 7.1a) are established at relevant functions and levels within the
> organization.
> The quality objectives shall be measureable and consistent with the quality
> policy"

>
> As the above company has departmental objectives (see Production dept's
> above) they meet 2/3 of 5.4.1, but Production alone, or the total departmental
> objectives, do not meet the requirement for - "including those needed
> to meet requirements for the product" . This is achieved via the "Purpose"
> statement seen in a procedure (another word for purpose is objective).
>
> Therefore in future on-site doc. reviews and pre-assessments please make
> sure procedures/work instructions contain a Purpose/Objective statements.

I'm not sure how this will fit in sometimes. I am from the 'old school' of 'proper' procedures with a statement of scope, a stated scope and such. The military manufacturing environment I worked in required very regimented, structured procedures - Purpose, Scope, Related Procedures, Relevant Specifications, etc., etc. However, in today's world there are a lot of flow charts and other formats. Much which used to be written is now 'trained' and not documented at all. I feel comfortable if, when I interview, the interviewee(s) can articulate the purpose and scope. I may ask, for example, why they need the procedure - written or 'trained' (purpose) and to what it pertains (the scope). I also consider the size and nature of the business, the complexity of the product and processes and such.

> If a company reads the standard literally, and has only the mandatory
> six procedures, we should point them to 5.4.1 and ask them how they can
> meet the requirement.

Here I look for measureables in each department. I must admit I have never seen a company with only 6 documented procedures and had not envisioned a company with only the required 6 documented procedures. I would ask how the measureables they cite, one or more, pertain to the quality of the product. As for the "...must be consistent with the quality policy..." requirement, it's a call by comparison. I ask them to explain and then ask myself if their explanation makes sense - is rational. 'Cop outs' are where one looks at the wiggle word "...relevant...". I ask why a department is excluded (as not relevant). Accounting typically escapes on this one, for example.

> I look forward to your input to this interpretation, before I make this
> our policy.
>
> I propose adding another class of QSIR between major and minor, i.e. medium.
> Where two mediums would make a major. An example of a medium would be
> where a company has fully documented its procedure for training all employees,
> but can only show evidence of its training for shop floor employees, and
> not monthly paid staff.

I would not like to see a complication of an additional classification. IMHO if a company writes that they train all employees, they're lying to begin with (how many plant managers, for example, are 'trained' per se?). I guess what I'd say here is that if the company wrote one thing but didn't fulfill it's own requirements, I'd give them a major at a registration audit. I would like to read their procedure before going further as the words can make all the difference. However, my experience has been that in most companies just about everyone receives some training whether it be OJT (such as a materials person), training on relevant internal procedures (some of which often times are 'known' procedures - not formal, documented procedures). This training should be documented, but often is not. Sales folks may be trained, for example, but this is often a department which does not document training when I first see them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Comments folks?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Comments folks?
Sure,

A couple of things here; first, "including those needed to meet requirements for the product" I interpret as being filled (by in large) through the sales process and the production order/control plan process. I have a hard time seeing where a “procedure” will outline these requirements.

As far as training, no procedure is required, but I recommend one. I agree that many organizations fail to consider the carpet side of manufacturing, and only stress the concrete side. Training needs to incorporate both hard and soft skills, both management and labor. Also, remember the standards says “provide training or take other actions” Hence, we can use this language to eliminate Marc’s concern of:

“IMHO if a company writes that they train all employees, they're lying to begin with (how many plant managers, for example, are 'trained' per se?).”


BTW, my three recommended procedures are:

  • Management Review
  • Contract Review (yes, I even keep the ’94 version name)
  • Training
 
E

energy

#3
Training only

We have approached the training aspect by requiring a Training Schedule for ALL positions. Sales and "Representatives" that work on Commission from selling our product in various areas of the country are included. No position, except the CEO, is excluded. We will probably grandfather all our Senior personnel who have set up the Company and are instrumental in its operation. All personnel who report to the CEO actually wrote their own with the requirement that they think about the skills they would like their replacements to have. As usual, the hardest part was getting them to do it.

As for having Departmental goals, I intend to try to develop measurable goals upstream, rather than setting goals for our weld shop or coating operations. This group works like a well oiled machine. They will continue at a pace that makes it difficult for me to keep up with the minimum QA checks we have established. There's no conceivable way to increase their productivity or the Quality of their work. In other words, they are B***s to the wall, all the time. We will have measurable goals and objectives that will combine groups and not focus on individual departments. After all, we decide what we want to measure. All levels has more to do with what we call levels. JMHO. Nice to see you back, Cheech!:ko: :smokin:
 
R

Randy Stewart

#4
This is thin

"including those needed to meet requirements for the product"
I'm trying to keep my personal feelings out of this. I don't like this set up but that doesn't make it wrong. I would be very interested in seeing their corrective actions if the the product is rejected. Plus how are the customer requirements made known.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ed Panek Remote Audit GOTOMEETING thoughts Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 15
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
N Looking to Impress - New Job - Advice, Thoughts, Comments Welcome Career and Occupation Discussions 23
T Internal Nonconformance procedure thoughts (AS9100) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
S Inventory Control - Any thoughts would be appreciated ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Proposed Quality Improvement - Thoughts? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
E Discussion between co-worker on tolerance and uncertainty and how to apply it. Thoughts? 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D ASQ CMQ/OE Certification - Share your thoughts ASQ - American Society for Quality 3
Marc Thoughts about the vBulletin to Xenforo Software Migration - 2 October 2018 Forum News and General Information 4
J MDR reporting and CAPA thoughts? Classifying Complaints on Risk 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 13
Q Thoughts on Communications relevant to the Quality Management System ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Thoughts on the impact of the General Data Protection Regulation? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 5
B Thoughts on performing an ISO 9001:2015 Remote Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Marc Thoughts about Extrapolating Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
Marc Your thoughts? A weekend calibration teaser General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
Marc Thoughts about Discussion Forums Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
S Destructive Gage RR - Using Crossed - want your thoughts Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
Marc Thoughts for Food - What's on the menu? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 3
D Thoughts on the Implementation and Effectiveness of A3 methodology Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
Antonio Vieira Thoughts on implementation of Quality Management System in a Police Department ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
W Thoughts on having Safety Shower in ISO Class 7 Cleanroom ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
C Thoughts on validation of Legacy Systems for Medical Device Software EU Medical Device Regulations 2
T Need thoughts on calibration of Class A volumetric glassware General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Marc About 1940 to today - TV - Sunday Morning Thoughts Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
G Thoughts on Audit Finding for not doing Gage R and R for Visual Inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
Sean Kelley What are your thoughts on Process vs Product Control Plans ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
N Improvement in a Medical Plastics Compounder Job Shop - Any thoughts? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 14
B Your thoughts on Communicating to Customers the Actions on Customer Survey Customer Complaints 4
Steve Prevette Tom Peters thoughts on Six Sigma, ISO Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
N Quantifying our QMS Objectives - Your Thoughts ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Jerry Eldred New ILAC Requirements Regarding Repeatability - Your thoughts on this please Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 11
Marc Thoughts and Opinions about the ASQ (American Society for Quality) ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 34
Richard Regalado ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability and Some of my Thoughts IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
bobdoering Dr Wheeler gives his thoughts on "Estimating the Fraction Nonconforming" Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 0
bobdoering Dr. Wheeler is back with his thoughts on MSA and Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
C ISO 27001 and Bulk Email Policy - Your Thoughts, Please IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
jasonb067 Cognos Feedback - Cognos BI software from IBM - What your thoughts? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 4
C Organization unsure about the ISO 9001 implementation route? Share your thoughts. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
Hershal Memorial Day thoughts - 2010 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
5 What are your thoughts on my NPD (New Product Development) process map? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
A What are you thoughts on the 1.5 sigma shift Six Sigma 3
R Considering adding ISO 13485 certification - Your thoughts? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
I Seeking thoughts on using BOTH FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) and FMEA ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 17
D KAIZEN Event "tools to use" Brain Jogger - Your thoughts please Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 12
P Are they "Satisfying Customer Requirements?" - Thoughts and Comments Customer Complaints 1
Paul Simpson ISO 19011 revision - Your thoughts General Auditing Discussions 53
P ISO 9001 in construction organization: Your thoughts (quality control plan, etc) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Marc Your Opinions and thoughts about the Elsmar Cove forum - Why do you visit the forum? Forum News and General Information 50
Marc Thoughts about (the murder of) Manufacturing In the US Imported Legacy Blogs 2
M Non Conformance Reports - What are your thoughts on the title? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14

Similar threads

Top Bottom