SBS - The best value in QMS software

510(k) submission - Questions about page 2 of form 3654

W

wangyang

#1
Hi all
When i am preparing the 510(k) submission, i have to complete the form 3654, in page 2 of this form, it states that all sections should be considered and marked with "yes, no or N/A". When there is a long standard, such as IEC 60601-1, what does it mean by " section" and how many pages do you use?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Re: questions about the page 2 of form 3654

Welcome to the Cove, wangyang!

It is the weekend here in the USA so your question will probably be answered in about 12 - 24 hour time. We hope you get what information you need and come back for more and to share your experiences.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#4
When i am preparing the 510(k) submission, i have to complete the form 3654, in page 2 of this form, it states that all sections should be considered and marked with "yes, no or N/A". When there is a long standard, such as IEC 60601-1, what does it mean by "section" and how many pages do you use?
We usually would regard IEC 60601-1 in its entirety as a single "section" for purposes of Form 3654, or at most as fitting onto one Page Two. However, it's possible that our applications of standards don't involve as many deviations as others might have. With 60601-1, for instance, we typically either apply a section in its entirety or don't apply it at all.

If we had a device for which one section of a long standard was applied and many other sections were not applicable, we would group the not-applicable sections into one entry-block on Page Two, and explain their non-applicability in a Summary Report.

If we had a device for which our application of a standard had extensive and complex deviations and justifications, we would attach a separate Summary Report rather than try to fit the information into the Page Two format.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
M

melissa66

#5
I had that same question...When I filled mine out, I only separated 60601 into portions based on testing: safety and emissions and immunity; basically because I got separate reports for each portion. Also, since there was no deviations in my tests, I didn't think that it was useful to mention every section of the standard. I have not heard anything back yet from the FDA ... to see if I completed it wrong.
 
C

celia4237

#6
Here is the response i received from FDA.

"You could group the sections. For example if sections 12, 13, and 14 are all N/A then you could state it that way. Please let me know if you need anything else."
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Some questions about voluntary consensus standards in traditional 510(k) submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
A Which guidance do you use for guiding the requirements of IFU for 510(k) submission? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
A Some doubts about traditional 510(k) submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
A Bench test report translation to English for 510(k) submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
T First 510(k) submission - Class II software as medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
K 510(K) File eCopy Submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 16
P Predicate Device Information for 510(k) Submission Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
D First 510(k) Submission - Don't Forget Tips US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
D Is Human Factors testing mandatory for a 510(k) submission? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 16
D Pre-Submission after 510(K) Submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
M CBE (Change Being Effected) 510(k) Submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
K 510(K) Submission (Traditional) for Medical Device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 15
shimonv Referring to previously submitted biocompatibility results in a new 510(k) submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
S 510(k) Submission - Orthodontist that wants to distribute aligners in the US ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
shimonv Does 510(k) submission need to include UDI Data Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
D Documentation Requirements for Firmware in a 510(k) Submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
D Use of clinical data in a 510(k) submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
M 510(K) submission for clinical study devices US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
V 510(K) Cyber Security Documentation for Pre-market Submission (Templates) Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
A FDA 510(k) Submission Timelines US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M Demonstrating battery safety in 510(K) submission for the FDA Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
S FDA Draft Guidance on HLA Kits 510(k) Submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
D FDA 510(k) Submission Tests - Posterior Cervical Spinestem 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
Z Agile Software Development and 510(k) Submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T 510(k) Revision Level History and Submission Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
W 510(k) Submission for a huge, changing complex Medical Device System Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
T Level of Concern for Class II Medical Device Software 510(k) Submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
S Revision of 510(k) Submission Documents - Risk Management Report? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
R Who must sign 510(k) Submission? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
A Should I submit the entire copy of my software in a 510(k) submission?? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
I About the 510(k) Submission US Company but Products are made in China US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
S Clinical or Non-Clinical Data in 510(k) Submission for a type II Medical Device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
shimonv Bench Testing as part of 510(k) Submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
C Locating Approved Special 510(k) Submission Data from 1997 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
I Cost to prepare 510(k) submission (resources, time, dollars) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T IEC 62304:2006: Medical device software SDLC- CE Vs. Fda 510(k) submission IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 16
W Applying for 510(k) Submission for Blood Glucose Monitor System 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
P Blood Glucose Monitor - Sample 510(k) submission application 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
C 510(K) submission - Is it necessary if we changed from nylon to polyester suture? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
S Does Windows Service Pack (SP-3) upgrade need supplementary 510(k) submission?? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
L Software Documents in 510(k) submission (Moderate Level Concern) Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
T 510(k) Submission for Outsourced Automated Instrumentation System Components 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Submission of 510(k) - Does the FDA require a predefined structure of the content? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R EC11 - Guidance Document - FDA 510 (k) Submission - ECG Monitors 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
D FDA Question: Contents of an FDA 510(k) Submission ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J US Device Listing when not the 510(k) owner Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
supadrai Possible to Submit a 510(k) if you have never, do not and cannot produce the device for which you're submitting the application? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
S Special 510(k) for orthopedic implant 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
M Label change - 510(k) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom