7.3 or not to 7.3, that is the question

D

dbzman

#1
I work for a Heat Treating company. The only thing that we do is heat treat our customers parts. We do not manufacure a "product".

I have been told that we can opt out of 7.3.

Is this true? I have my doubts.

Dazed and Confused.....

:bonk:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

Jimmy Olson

#2
Based on what you said you can easily exclude 7.3. Just put a short statement in your manual saying that you don't do any design and that you are excluding that portion of the standard.

There are several people here (including me) that have 7.3 excluded. There have also been several discussions along the same line that have some good information.

Here are a few:

http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=6582
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=5814
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=5796
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=2586
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=5021
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Here's my take on it. If your customers specify the hardness, case depth, etc. in every case I would say you can opt out. If there are some cases where the customer says "here's what I want to do with this part" and you specify how you meet the requirement, then you are designing part of the product. If you assist them in coming up with appropriate heat treating, and they put it on their drawing, specification, or PO, then they are still responsible for the design.

Of course if you want to do it anyway (to improve your business, not just meet the requirement), you can always include 7.3 because a note in the standard says that it may also be applied to the development of product realization processes.
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Trusted Information Resource
#4
IMHO....
If I were in your shoes, I would worry more about how you validate (and document that validation) the heat treating process than design. I used to be in a plant that did heat treating. We excluded design using the justification that the customers told us what ASTM spec we had to meet.

I also agree that you could use the design requirements in your process design...but hopefully any process changes you make go through a planning and commisioning process.
 
D

dbzman

#5
Thanks!

I was confusedfor a while....

The path that I was going down was to look at 7.3 as addressing both design of product and process. If you designed a product 7.3, if you designed a process, 7.3....

Thanks for the clarification!

:bigwave:
 
D

dbzman

#6
One More.....

Just one more clarification needed:

In the book :Exploring ISO/TS 16949:2002" it states that:

"ISO/TS 16949:2002 allows scope exclusion of product design, but requires all of Clause 7.3 be applied to the manufacturing process. This brings a much stronger focus upon the manufacturing process than was present in QS-9000"

Is this not applicable to use because we have a heat treating process and not a manufacturing process?

Thanks!

:ko:
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Trusted Information Resource
#7
Since you posted this in the ISO 9001 forum I assumed that that was the standard you had to live with. The answer is completely different if you look at it from a TS 16949 standpoint. The only allowed exclusion in TS is in 7.3 as it applies to product design. You must apply all of 7.3 to design of processes.
The only permitted exclusions for this Technical Specification relate to 7.3 where the organization is not responsible for product design and development.
Permitted exclusions do not include manufacturing process design.
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Trusted Information Resource
#8
I think I misread your last post. Here's what I should have answered with. From TS 16949 terms & definitions:
manufacturing
process of making or fabricating
- production materials,
- production or service parts,
- assemblies, or
- heat treating, welding, painting, plating or other finishing services
 
S

Shaun Daly

#9
>The path that I was going down was to look at 7.3 as addressing both >design of product and process. If you designed a product 7.3, if you >designed a process, 7.3....

I agree with Howste regarding the above.

For TS16949:2002 you must apply 7.3 to the design of your manufacturing processes.

ISO 9000 7.1 does reference planning of product realisation & quality plans, which cover similiar ground, but, IMHO, ISO 9000 does not require you to apply 7.3 to the design of your manufacturing processes - thank goodness.
 
P

p_tww

#10
Yes. If you are in ISO9000 situation, you could exclude 7.3, cause the company only serve heat treatment process,not design for product. and you should establish your product realization process planning.
But if in TS situation, the only permitted exclusion was Part of 7.3( product design only).
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Question regarding AQL - ISO 3951 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
D Document Control Question involving DocuSign US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
JoeRandom11 Question about Customer Supplied Equipment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
M ISO 13485: 2016 Lot numbering question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Nadcap - Heat Treatment Proof of Verification question for Digital results AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
JoeRandom11 Question of Calibration Cycles AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
D Software Validation Question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
B 8.5.1.1 Control Plan - question audit NC IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
C Document Identification Question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
D Question regarding PCR workstation Fume Hood upon first use ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
Moncia ISO 9001 calibration question please ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Q Quick question on the sequence of ISO 17025 external audits ISO 17025 related Discussions 14
D ISO 13485--Question regarding performing calibrations in house. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
S Document numbering question? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
J Has the facility been inspected? question in Certificate to Foreign Government application Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
M ESTAR 510(k) submission question Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
J Question on clause 5.2.2 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Ed Panek ISO 15223 Question EU Medical Device Regulations 2
R Question: Cg/Cgk formula Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
J Quick question on responsible person's experience requirements UK Medical Device Regulations 3
J PFMEA/control plan question- PLEASE HELP ! IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
3 Scope question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
L Question regarding "Customer Property" AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
T Noob question regarding sample size Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
K 510(k) Manufacturer question (private label and manufacture under another persons 510(k)) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M Question About Rolled Throughput Yield Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
M Quick Gage R&R Question Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
S Question: Best alternatives to audits for ensuring compliance Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
Ed Panek Question from 13485 Auditor ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
C Question on KAFO (Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis device) classification CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
T BMW GS 93010-2 Question Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
S FDA 510(K) submission question US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
Ron Rompen Question regarding CMM probe damage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
T FDA UDI Question - Class II Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
C Complaint Return Sample Size Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
8 Drawing Feature Question Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
D Question: How to analyze numerical and attribute data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 11
D Question on electronic signatures and initials on batch records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
A Special Characteristic question from Automotive CSR Customer and Company Specific Requirements 9
Ron Rompen GDT Question - is this even correct? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 17
C ISO Question - Do you say "I-S-O" or "I-Soh"? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 14
D Question regarding where "validations" fit according to ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Question on Supplier Quality (SCAR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
A +0/-.001 Tolerance question - Feature size is 1.249 +0/-.001 - Actually measures 1.2493 (.0003 OHL Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 12
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A Design Change/ECO Related Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S Configuration Item definition question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom