D
davidsb
New to TS; received third party non-conformance during surveillance audit because Lab we used to calibrate and did not have ISO17025 accreditation. As I dug into answering NC, I determined the following facts:
- External lab was the OEM of the equipment;
- No other lab could be found to do same calibration;
- Receive approval from all customers to use lab for calibration;
- External lab does not have a lab scope;
- All information required in a lab scope was found on calibration report
Short term, root cause, long term was approved by third party but rejected my objective evidence because they the calibration report I submitted in lieu of a lab scope was not a "controlled lab scope".
I really have no idea what to do next. The essence of what is required has been answered and put into place. Any suggestions on a direction would be most appreciated.
Thanks, Dave
- External lab was the OEM of the equipment;
- No other lab could be found to do same calibration;
- Receive approval from all customers to use lab for calibration;
- External lab does not have a lab scope;
- All information required in a lab scope was found on calibration report
Short term, root cause, long term was approved by third party but rejected my objective evidence because they the calibration report I submitted in lieu of a lab scope was not a "controlled lab scope".
I really have no idea what to do next. The essence of what is required has been answered and put into place. Any suggestions on a direction would be most appreciated.
Thanks, Dave