I got the letter, scanned it and removed the material from the site. It was Sunday when I read the letter in detail. What I am mad about is the 'mis-statements', the accusations of what was not there.
My basic policy here is if anyone complains of copyright or other issue - by e-mail, phone call, letter or what ever, I'll remove it if I believe they have a valid arguement or even when I feel they may have a real claim.
On the other hand, although there was another complaint (which I posted) recently, I can't say it has been a problem. It's rare, actually.
My basic policy here is if anyone complains of copyright or other issue - by e-mail, phone call, letter or what ever, I'll remove it if I believe they have a valid arguement or even when I feel they may have a real claim.
On the other hand, although there was another complaint (which I posted) recently, I can't say it has been a problem. It's rare, actually.