E
esalsan
Dear covers,
This is a theoretical situation. Lets say I am a manufacturer of a piece of software that generates invoices based on diagnostic tests performed. My software is not a medical device (only intended to generate invoices) and can obtain the information I need from many sources, one of which could be a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) in a hospital.
The PACS is classified as a medical device.
My software does then include some lines of code (perhaps wrapped into a component) that allows the information I need to be obtained from the PACS.
I am getting some discussions around whether the software/component would be an accessory to the PACS so based on the definition of accessory in the directive:
- it is not intended specifically by us to be used together with the PACS
because: an operator could enter the information manually and we can also connect with many other types of financial systems.
- The PACS works as intended by its manufacturer without the need or our software, i.e., in the words of the directive: it does not 'enable the device to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device'.
Is this correct?
Note: I have interpreted the 'it' in bold below to mean 'the device' in the definition of accessory:
any article which whilst not being a device is intended specifically by its manufacturer to be used together with a device to enable it to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device.
Thank you!
This is a theoretical situation. Lets say I am a manufacturer of a piece of software that generates invoices based on diagnostic tests performed. My software is not a medical device (only intended to generate invoices) and can obtain the information I need from many sources, one of which could be a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) in a hospital.
The PACS is classified as a medical device.
My software does then include some lines of code (perhaps wrapped into a component) that allows the information I need to be obtained from the PACS.
I am getting some discussions around whether the software/component would be an accessory to the PACS so based on the definition of accessory in the directive:
- it is not intended specifically by us to be used together with the PACS
because: an operator could enter the information manually and we can also connect with many other types of financial systems.
- The PACS works as intended by its manufacturer without the need or our software, i.e., in the words of the directive: it does not 'enable the device to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device'.
Is this correct?
Note: I have interpreted the 'it' in bold below to mean 'the device' in the definition of accessory:
any article which whilst not being a device is intended specifically by its manufacturer to be used together with a device to enable it to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device.
Thank you!