Sidney Vianna said:
If you SERIOUSLY think that organizations would prefer a non accredited certificate, over an accredited one, there is no point continuing this dialogue. If you read laurip's post about the organizations reaction when questioned about the non accredited status of their certs, it summarizes pretty much the level of ignorance on this issue.
A company that seeks a registrar's services absolutely should not be led, or even permitted to believe the "certificate" is different than expected. The registrar's contracting should be investigated and, if found to be vague or misleading, the registrar's accreditation should be revoked.
