Acquired Medical Device Product Line - Documentation Requirements for Device Master Record

#1
Looking for some guidance...

When a company acquires the manufacturing rights to an established product line, how is the Design History File, and any other similar legacy file, presented?

The company which manufactures the equipment had no part in the design activities, and did not author the original files. How are these presented in subsequent filings and audits?

The company for which I work was formed less than three years ago. The product we manufacture was designed over fifteen years ago and has performed well in its market. The design files, including all schematics and line (CAD) drawings hold the originator's markings.

The device is complex, consisting of multiple parts, assemblies, and subassemblies. Some subassemblies are purchased outside, many are assembled in our manufacturing facility.

I am currently processing an engineering change for the current company. The new CAD drawings wil carry our marks. How do they fin in the Design History File? Do we change and update all the existing, associated CAD drawings?

I am sure there is precedent for the actions which should or might be taken. Even the largest manufacturers of medical devices purchase rights to manufacture lines they did not design. I am just not sure how all should be integrated...
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#3
Thank you.

The question is not who maintains the document. On that we agree.

The question is what documents are maintained?

Do we rewrite all the design and development as if we designed and developed the product? Or do we maintain all the previous documents, such as the components of the technical file, CAD drawings, etc. under the previous company name and apply our name only when we modify the components?

My thought is that we begin a new Device Master Record, but use as the base, original technical files from the previous manufacturer, which were current at the point at which the product line was acquired, and move forward from there. And Engineering Change Notices would be under our name and authority, including the new CAD drawings and any modified work instructions.

I am not sure we can "take credit" for the design, but know we are responsible for its maintenance and continued development and modifications.

Your thoughts?
 

Tidge

Trusted Information Resource
#4
My humble opinion follows: The new owner of the 'product' should maintain enough DHF information to support a complete resubmission to the appropriate regulatory bodies... because they just might require you to do that. DHRs obviously have to be maintained for a sufficient time as specified by regulations. I can't imagine keeping DHR information and not having the accompanying DMR information.
 
#5
Tidge,

Thank you.

The question is not whether the documents should be maintained. They should and must be maintained.

My question is, should the documents which are maintained remain under the name of the previous manufacturer, or be rewritten under ours.

My concern is that if we rewrite the documents, we had no part in the design or development. The equipment has been performing, very well, in the field for over fifteen years. We have been producing the equipment for just over two.

If an auditor, either regulatory or registrar, asks to see the DMR, which name should appear on the CAD drawings and schematics? The designer's of the current manufacturer? It will require explanation, either way. But i am not sure how to explain our name being on the original documents, given the company was not in existence for over a decade of production.

The Device History Files (DHFs) do carry our name because production is independent of design and DHFs do not carry the manufacturing SOPs or design files.

Am I missing something?
 

Ed Panek

QA RA Small Med Dev Company
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
I would not alter past DMR or other documents. I would release the new DHF and latest DMR and update DHR documents to reflect ownership. I would then verify regulatory communication using FDA and EU MDD MDR guidance.

for drawings and specs you should sign off anything you did not previously own to demonstrate you reviewed and accepted them. A design review and risk analysis of the changes in ownership and project plan for the transition is also good.

I would also pose a question to your ISO auditor for what to do. They will have experience with this.
 
Last edited:

Tidge

Trusted Information Resource
#7
I agree with @Ed Panek to not alter (or otherwise update) past records motivated non-technical reasons. If you revise drawings, you will essentially just be expanding the DHF and this will likely be of little value, assuming the original documents are not deficient in some way.

It is natural to assume that a third party may ask a question why a different name appears on prints, but this shouldn't be something to suffer red-faced embarrassment over, assuming that due diligence was done on the acquisition.

Ultimately a drawing is just a design output. In my experience(*1): it is common for a certain class of auditor (typically by personality) to ask a single technical (or quasi-technical, as would be in the case of a specific human name on a drawing) question about a specific design output... when they have some personal curiosity/interest/familiarity, but this is somewhere on the spectrum of sutor, ne ultra crepidam. Less experienced and (IMO) less effective third party auditors can go off on peculiar tangents but there is no general way to prevent such behavior.

(*1) At my current company, we regularly interact with a third-party auditor who ALWAYS asks to see "(software) source code", no matter what the focus of the audit is and how tangential an examination of the source code could be for the audit. The examinations have never been related to a development project/process, nor has the bits of code ever been identified in any sort of corrective action, complaint, or recall... this auditor simply likes to look at code written by other people. I am reminded of a food critic always asking for a different napkin before the meal is served... there is certainly some circumstancence in the past life where the patron needed to do such a thing, but the action has long lost any significance and is borderline obsessive-compulsive behavior.
 

Philip B

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
We have a similar situation. We have just taken over the supply chain of a component which we re-pack, having previously purchased the component from another company who CE marked it themselves. We are now the entity CE marking the component for the first time and therefore take on design responsibility. As a re-packer we have previously excluded design from our QMS but are now going to have to introduce it. We have had no input into the design of the component so I'm also wondering how to incorporate this into our QMS and technical documentation so am very interested in the discussion here.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
supadrai Effect of a Merger on Acquired Company's Medical Device Licenses Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
S Labeling Requirements for Acquired Medical Device Inventory Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
JoCam Acquired Medical Devices - Company A buys the entire rights EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Design Responsibilities for Mature Acquired Product Lines ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Covering an acquired company in our ISO 13485 certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
M Merging Two Quality Management Systems when a Company is Acquired Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 8
B What happens to your ISO 9001 registration if you are acquired by a Company Without ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
K Integrating acquired existing product into Quality Management System Records ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M FDA Medical device reporting (Manufacturer in US; contract manufacturer OuS) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
JoCam Accessories for medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
G Medical Device Auditor (CMDA) certification exam by ASQ - looking for input Career and Occupation Discussions 1
M Prescription Form - Medical Devices US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
XRAY_3121 Drop Shipping Legend Medical Devices Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
B Documenting Medical Device Complaints after End of Life? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Medical Device License as Distributor Canada Medical Device Regulations 8
M Preparing a document for Raw Material of Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R Medical device regulations in African countries Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
Jessesun The application of ozone sterilization in medical treatment US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Production line for medical devices Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
S Design & Development records for Medical Devices Packaging and Labelling ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
K MHLW MO169 2021 Japan Ministerial Ordinance on Standards for Manufacturing Control and Quality Control for Medical Devices and In-Vitro Diagnostics Japan Medical Device Regulations 2
U Medical Devices Labeling Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K Guidance on X-Ray Medical Devices for Animal Use - FDA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
Z Swiss Authorized representative & non-medical device regulations Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
T FDA UDI Question - Class II Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
blackholequasar ISO 13485 certification prior to Medical Device Manufacturing... worth it? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
dgrainger Informational Good news: Commission proposes a progressive roll-out of the new In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation EU Medical Device Regulations 3
P Brexit Germany - Import Medical Device For Clinical Study EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Medical Device Marketing Material - Control of Social Media 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
Ed Panek Make sure you hire competent QA RA Folks before making a "Medical Device." Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
dgrainger Informational MDCG 2021-24 - Guidance on classification of medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S State Licensing requirements for Medical Devices sold in the US directly to hospitals and tissue banks 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
MedicalDevicesCanada How to find a medical device contract manufacturer, MDSAP certified? Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
B ISO 11197, Venting of Medical Supply Units - cl. 201.11.2.2.101 Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
Q Best country to import medical devices into Europe Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
dgrainger Informational MHRA's Software and AI as a Medical Device Change Programme UK Medical Device Regulations 0
dgrainger Informational Consultation on the future regulation of medical devices in the United Kingdom UK Medical Device Regulations 1
S Medical Device - Technical Documentation structure EU Medical Device Regulations 1
JoCam On-product labels for Medical Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
LostLouie Archived Specifications and Drawings for Medical Device Technical Files EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Reprocessing of an accessory for a medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 4
V Taiwan - Veterinary medical devices Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
K System of medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A Class 1 medical device - Thailand Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
D Dental application - medical product or not? Other US Medical Device Regulations 8
P Interchangeable/alternative parts in BOM (medical device) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
U Is Initial Importer Status Required if a Medical Device is Manufactured and Sterilized by an OEM in the US Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
B Research Use Only (RUO) IVD Medical Devices in China China Medical Device Regulations 2
J Shoe Covers - medical device class I EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Are pipette heads "medical devices"? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom