A
Atul Khandekar
(I think) I'm through with moving threads. Didn't do much of re-naming (Dial-up...takes a lot of time...) but I intend to start on that next - one major motivation is revisiting Don Winton gems.
Adding more forums - Getting Serious about a Big Job - Your suggestions?
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Yeah - I miss Don a lot. Atul, I didn't know you were on dialup. Maybe you said before and I forgot. I end up on dialup from time to time and it's frustrating.
Claes - My continued thanks. To even take that forum on was nice of you being as big as it is.
I've been away a bit but I'll be back on it this weekend.
As an FYI, Google did what looks like a major update recently and it appears it caught a lot of the changes. And I haven't looked closely at the numbers, but it looks like traffic is increasing a bit.
Claes - My continued thanks. To even take that forum on was nice of you being as big as it is.
I've been away a bit but I'll be back on it this weekend.
As an FYI, Google did what looks like a major update recently and it appears it caught a lot of the changes. And I haven't looked closely at the numbers, but it looks like traffic is increasing a bit.
Claes Gefvenberg
Admin
Finally....Whewwww, that took me while, but now it's done. I think I'll wear dark glasses for a whileClaes Gefvenberg said:
. Jokes apart I could have done it a lot faster, but I kept getting stuck in those old threads. Some of it is so interesting...
/Claes
The evolution of the interpretations and requirements always interests me, including my evolving interpretations and overall what I have learned. I've changed my views on some things whilst better understanding things that I thought I understood before.
There are a lot of thoughts here in this database. Some good general conversation and some very interesting discussions. Admittedly there's a lot of chaff, so to speak, but there's also a lot of knowledge and experience conveyed.
Claes, I appreciate the time you've spent. I'm sorta hit-miss right now and haven't been focusing on some of the forums. I still have some work to do, but I sorta see it as ongoing to some degree. As is evident I've added a couple of forums and split off a couple of topics, including Records and Quality Manuals. I got an e-mail the other day that was rather rude saying that I don't "allow" enough discussion on Lean. I didn't split that out as there aren't that many Lean specific threads and so it's grouped in Tools. I wrote back and told the writer that no one is prohibiting discussion on Lean and suggested the writer start threads on Lean - but I haven't seen any yet.
A while back I consolidated a number of individual forums because there were so many. I've sorta gotten over my 'complexity' fear, but I still want to keep eyes open - I'm not sure 100 specific forums is the best idea. Right now there are about 45 'significant' forums.
There are a lot of thoughts here in this database. Some good general conversation and some very interesting discussions. Admittedly there's a lot of chaff, so to speak, but there's also a lot of knowledge and experience conveyed.
Claes, I appreciate the time you've spent. I'm sorta hit-miss right now and haven't been focusing on some of the forums. I still have some work to do, but I sorta see it as ongoing to some degree. As is evident I've added a couple of forums and split off a couple of topics, including Records and Quality Manuals. I got an e-mail the other day that was rather rude saying that I don't "allow" enough discussion on Lean. I didn't split that out as there aren't that many Lean specific threads and so it's grouped in Tools. I wrote back and told the writer that no one is prohibiting discussion on Lean and suggested the writer start threads on Lean - but I haven't seen any yet.
A while back I consolidated a number of individual forums because there were so many. I've sorta gotten over my 'complexity' fear, but I still want to keep eyes open - I'm not sure 100 specific forums is the best idea. Right now there are about 45 'significant' forums.
Claes Gefvenberg
Admin
Really? I cannot remember any of us trying to prevent anyone from posting Lean threads???Marc said:
Well, I prefer fewer forums with wider scope instead of lots of very narrow ones. That way we can be pretty sure to see a reasonable level of activity in them.Marc said:
/Claes
