# Advanced MSA of Continuous Data - Part 1: Within Part Variation

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
This is the eleventh in a series of articles on MSA, and the first in advanced MSA topics. The focus of this article will be on how to handle within product variation (WIV).

WIV is significant variation in the form of a product. Significant means that it detectable by your measurement device. Examples of variation in form include shaft diameter variation due to lobes, or a taper/barrel/hourglass shape; thickness variation due to parallelism and more.

WIV can have a significant impact on the acceptability of a measurement system. While technically part of the product not the measurement system, it definitely impacts the measurement system. It cannot be isolated using the standard AIAG Gage R&R study, but requires a special approach. The AIAG MSA manual touches on this and presents a Range method for calculating the WIV effect. I show an ANOVA approach that allows an evaluation of all of the interactions with WIV.

When I first decided to start this blog, I planned to demonstrate it using Minitab's General Linear Model (GLM). Fortunately, the new Minitab 16 made this easier with the Expanded Gage R&R Study feature. Note: Everything I show here can be duplicated with earlier versions of Minitab using GLM. The graphs must be created using the Graph commands and some creativity, and the metrics will have to be calculated by storing results and manually performing the calculations.

You can follow along by opening the attached PDF file.
• First, determine whether WIV is a potential issue. You may know this already from process knowledge, or suspect it from high Repeatability variation or an Operator*Part interaction.
• Create a Gage Study worksheet. Either copy the format used in the attachment, or use Minitab to create a full factorial design for 3 factors.
• Identify specific locations on the product to be measured by all operators. These can be selected at random or by design. If selected by design, this must be entered as a Fixed factor into Minitab.
• Perform study
• Analyze following the attached file. I recommend starting with all factors and 2-way interactions in the model. Review the p-values and remove all 2-way interactions with p-values greater than 0.05. If all interactions involving the Operator are removed, then look at the p-value for the Operator. If the Operator p-value is greater than 0.05, remove it also.
• Interpret the Session Window the same as a standard MSA for %SV, %Tol, etc.
• Interpret Graph1 the same as a standard MSA.
• Create Graph2 and interpret similar to Graph1. You will see two new graphs, the Measurement by WIV graph and the Part * WIV graph. The Measurement by WIV graph shows differences in the location measured on the part, and the interaction shows whether this location to location difference varies by part.
Now that you understand the impact of WIV on your measurement system, what do you do with that knowledge? It depends.

If the WIV varies randomly on the product (i.e., it is unpredictable), you cannot prevent it from affecting your measurement system. You can recognize it as part of your total variance equation (acknowledgements to bobdoering), but it will always affect your measurements.

If the WIV is predictable by location, you can take this into account and improve your R&R results by specifying measurement locations in your work instructions.

Last advice: Although it is possible to remove the effects of WIV from your R&R results, SPC and capability results, it will still have an impact on function. For example, a shaft with lobes may not fit a bearing correctly, so beware.

#### Attachments

• 855.9 KB Views: 657
Last edited:

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
For those of you that have been waiting over a year since I promised this post, I sincerely apologize. I hope it is worth your wait.

#### bobdoering

Trusted Information Resource
It is absolutely critical to understand the impact of the within-part variation on the measurement system. But, one has to recognize what question they are trying to answer with the MSA study they are performing.

There are two independent factors in the total variance equation that are the result of measurement - gage error and measurement error. Gage error is the error the gage is responsible for when used in a measurement system. Measurement error is essentially the error of using the gage incorrectly.

If the question is what statistically significant resolution can the gage provide me when measuring a feature - or "gage error", then you need to eliminate the within part effect from variation about the part, because that variation is not the "fault" of the measuring device. It is a function of the technique employed when the device is put to use. The within-part variation that will remain is the effect of the part on the gage and visa versa - such as gage flex or gage pressure. Those are appropriate to consider for gage error.

If you want to capture both gage error and measurement error in an attempt to describe gage system error, then you can have the test operators measure the part randomly as a part of the gage R&R. It will inflate the error as the operators use the gage lacking proper measurement techniques, and it will be difficult to determine what action to take to minimize the error unless you perform the test described above separately. Not only will you pick up effects of roundness error, if the measurement technique is left wide open, you will also pick up taper. Gage R&R is capable of collecting a vast amount of error and reporting it. But...it will usually leave a mess behind to clean up - especially if it "fails".

Even when trying to determine variation from measurement error, there are errors that can not be detected, such as using the wrong gage on two or three lobed diameter features. The measurement will be repeatably wrong, and the analysis will be, also. That is why even with the most sophisticated software, thinking is still required.

Miner has provided a very thorough analysis here, and I hope this additional clarification is also helpful.

Last edited:

#### Marc

##### Fully vaccinated are you?
You can follow along by opening the attached PDF file.
It coud be during the migration that the link to the .pdf file disappeared. If possible, would you please re-attach it?

Marc

#### Mario Vigil

##### Registered
Miner, Can you help me understand the test procedure used to determine WIV in the worksheet? I've read over the instruction to 'Identify specific locations on the product to be measured by all operators.' If these specific locations are measured more than once, we call this multiple trials. What is done differently to determine WIV 1 and WIV 2?

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
Each part is measured in two locations and each location is measured twice. The analysis uses the repeated measurements of each location to determine the repeatability. It uses the difference between locations on the same part to determine WIV.

#### max8086

##### Registered
For some reason, perhaps a plug-in issue, the PDF file cannot be opened. I've tried in 5 different pdf readers and browsers. If possible, would you please re-attach it? Thank you

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
I assume that you are getting the image below. Select the download icon, then try "Open with system viewer"

#### Jim Wynne

I assume that you are getting the image below. Select the download icon, then try "Open with system viewer"
In three different browsers (Edge, Chrome and Firefox, all latest versions) I don't get the "Open with system viewer" option. I can save the file and open it, however.

Advanced MSA of Continuous Data Part 4: How to Sample Parts Imported Legacy Blogs 2
Advanced MSA of Continuous Data Part 3: Are 3 Operators or 2 Replicates Enough? Imported Legacy Blogs 0
Advanced MSA of Continuous Data Part 2: Are 10 Parts Enough? Imported Legacy Blogs 0
Informational APQP4Wind - Advanced Product Quality Planning for the Wind Power Supply Chain APQP and PPAP 3
AS9100 News PPAP in the Aerospace Sector - What is it? AS9145 - Requirements for Advanced Product Quality Planning and Production Part Approval Process AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
Y Application of IEC/EN 62304 at an advanced stage of software development IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
SCMH Awareness Webinar Focused on the revised Advanced Product Quality Planning APQP AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
N Preparing a supplier readiness report (advanced launch report) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M VDA 6.3 - 2010 (newest) advanced excel form Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
Advanced Surveillance and Recertification Procedures - being discontinued by the IAF December 2019 update ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Terumo Cardiovascular Systems is recalling some Advanced Perfusion System 1 products Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
Y Advanced FMEA Training Seminars in Europe Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
Functional Datums - Advanced Concepts of GD&T 2nd edition by Alex K Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
A Advanced Purchasing Procedure guidelines or templates Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Druck DPI 620 Advanced Modular Calibration System General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
F What Combination (Combined Advanced Therapy Product) Products are Approved in the EU? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
G APQP (advanced product quality planning) for cable assemblies APQP and PPAP 1
A When do you start the Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) Process? APQP and PPAP 10
R Can anyone suggest regarding advanced improvements on 5S Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
Chinese Factories Moving On Up in the pursuit of Advanced Manufacturing World News 1
Training Competencies - Advanced Manufacturing Industries Framework of Competencies Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
Honda Accord Advanced Driver Assist System (ADAS) auto-pilot system World News 3
Advanced Micro Devices' new dual-core processors prices revealed After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 2
J Plant Quality 'War Room' - Advanced Program Teams Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
D APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) - Seeking a simple, effective format Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
Advanced Quality System Tools - 328 page book on quality tools from Boeing Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
Conducting an MSA Test on scales Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
MSA samples Preparation. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
MSA Frequency related literature Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
%AV=0 in the MSA GRR Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
MSA - Dealing with inherent within-part variation in assemblies Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
Ford Q1 MSA - Virtual Site Visit Hardware Manufacturing and Related Processes 14
MSA on set of parts with low variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 20
MSA Reference Manual 2nd Edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
Medical Device - fixture qualification and MSA Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
MSA - Using a R&R study for a Tape Measure Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
Options when MSA acc. to VDA 5 is NOK (Qms > 30%) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
MSA for non-contact CMM - ISO10360 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
Thermometers and Thermocouple or Transducer's require MSA? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
MSA Studies for chemical analytical instruments in QC Lab Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
IATF MSA study Type 1 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
MSA after the device move Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
MSA clause or wording needed. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
MSA clause 7.1.5.1.1 - Statistical studies on counting weight scale Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
MSA Study Type 2 (special conditions ) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
When the MSA results show no operator influence Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
MSA for attribute relation gage Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
MSA Study Type 1 (CMM) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
MSA Study Type 1 not capable. We are at the limit. And manufacturing wants to continue producing. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7