AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method - Page 135 of MSA manual 3rd edition

C

cbeatty

#1
The Analytical Method for attribute msa on page 135 of MSA manual 3rd edition is the preferred method per AIAG. Other than the MSA manual, I have found very little information on this method. Are there many other people out there using this? Does anyone have a spreadsheet for the analytical method that they would be willing to share?
For years we have been using the 2 person x 20 part x2 times short version. This may have had some shortcomings but is was quick and straightforward. It was not unreasonable to expect personnel at various plants to be able to implement it. With the analytical method, I fear the complexity will overwhelm many sites that we have.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

Atul Khandekar

#2
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

For years we have been using the 2 person x 20 part x2 times short version. This may have had some shortcomings but is was quick and straightforward. It was not unreasonable to expect personnel at various plants to be able to implement it. With the analytical method, I fear the complexity will overwhelm many sites that we have.
IMO you may continue using this if it is still acceptable to your customers.
 

antoine.dias

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

The Analytical Method for attribute msa on page 135 of MSA manual 3rd edition is the preferred method per AIAG. Other than the MSA manual, I have found very little information on this method. Are there many other people out there using this? Does anyone have a spreadsheet for the analytical method that they would be willing to share?
For years we have been using the 2 person x 20 part x2 times short version. This may have had some shortcomings but is was quick and straightforward. It was not unreasonable to expect personnel at various plants to be able to implement it. With the analytical method, I fear the complexity will overwhelm many sites that we have.
As long as your customer approves the way you work you are safe.

But, if you deliver to e.g. Ford you have the following guidelines from their customer specific requirements :

Quote:
Variable gauge studies should utilize 10 parts, 3 operators and 3 trials. Attribute gauge studies should utilize 50 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials. Effective attribute gauge study samples include parts within specification and parts outside specification for each criterion being measured and within the expected range of manufacturing variability.
Unquote

Best regards,

Antoine
 
B

Bill Ryan - 2007

#5
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

But, if you deliver to e.g. Ford you have the following guidelines from their customer specific requirements :

Quote:
Variable gauge studies should utilize 10 parts, 3 operators and 3 trials. Attribute gauge studies should utilize 50 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials. Effective attribute gauge study samples include parts within specification and parts outside specification for each criterion being measured and within the expected range of manufacturing variability.
Unquote
Does that mean Ford considers a "should" as a "shall"? :biglaugh: :bonk:
 
C

cbeatty

#6
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

Unfortunately, my customer (GM) has not been too responsive to my request for approval of the short form. It seems that the people who make the decisions in supplier quality do not know enough about MSA to make an informed decision so I have been passed onto to some else and have not gotten any further. If anyone has Ford, Chrysler or GM as a customer, what attribute study have you been using? Thanks.
 
A

amirodemachio

#7
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

Quote:
Attribute gauge studies should utilize 50 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials. Effective

hi all,

This is the first time i'm joing in this forum... is there any method that using less than 50 parts..? i saw a presentation slide by Rolls-Royce.. they using a method that i'm not familiar with but acceptable to TS16949 standard.. the minimum recommendation is 20 parts.. i'm not sure whether this is the same method as cbeatty is using.. can someone comment on this..

TQ
 
A

Atul Khandekar

#9
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

Quote:
Attribute gauge studies should utilize 50 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials. Effective

hi all,

This is the first time i'm joing in this forum... is there any method that using less than 50 parts..? i saw a presentation slide by Rolls-Royce.. they using a method that i'm not familiar with but acceptable to TS16949 standard.. the minimum recommendation is 20 parts.. i'm not sure whether this is the same method as cbeatty is using.. can someone comment on this..

TQ
Welcome to posting at the Cove, amirodemachio !:bigwave:

The Rolls Royce training document you are referring, says select up to 30 parts with minimum 20 recommended. They are calculating the effectiveness scores and not the kappa scores. Please read the attribute kappa crosstab method described in the MSA manual - in addition to kappa statistic, it does show effectiveness calculations as well as false alarm and miss rates.

Also See previous discussions on this topic::read:

Attribute Gage R&R - Number of Samples - OFI during our TS-16949 surveillance audit

and

TS 16949 - AIAG's MSA Manual - Thread Inspection Gage - Attribute Gage R&R

Hope this helps...If not, just ask and we would try to answer any specific query.
 
B

Bill Ryan - 2007

#10
Re: AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method

Unfortunately, my customer (GM) has not been too responsive to my request for approval of the short form. It seems that the people who make the decisions in supplier quality do not know enough about MSA to make an informed decision so I have been passed onto to some else and have not gotten any further. If anyone has Ford, Chrysler or GM as a customer, what attribute study have you been using? Thanks.
Cheatty - Welcome to the Cove :bigwave:

We are Tier 1, 2, and 3 to GM and we still use the 20 parts, 2 operators, 2 trials method with the acceptance being that all 4 measurements for each part agree. Haven't had a problem so far :cfingers: .
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T TS 16949 - AIAG's MSA Manual - Thread Inspection Gage - Attribute Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
J AIAG's MSA Manual 3rd Edition Attribute Gage Study - Calculating the UCI and LCI Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
V AIAG's MSA III Edition - Forms and Formulas - Attribute Gage R&R Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Attribute Gage R&R Form - Long Version - AIAG's MSA Manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 35
B Wrong standard deviation calculation in AIAG SPC manual? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 10
M Should there be another column in the Optimization section (step 6) of AIAG-VDA DFMEA form? FMEA and Control Plans 0
D Locking Control Limits and SPC Sample Sizes (AIAG/Automotive Requirements) Six Sigma 2
M Inconsistency of VDA-AIAG severity table for DFMEA with the manual text FMEA and Control Plans 0
M How to record the effects of adjacent systems (shown in boundary diagram) in the AIAG-VDA DFMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 0
H Quality planning sign-off in AIAG APQP Manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
H RPN in AIaG-VDA FMEA Manual FMEA and Control Plans 1
Sonja D AIAG VDA PFMEA and Control Plan training FMEA and Control Plans 9
abrego44 AIAG PPAP manual for service part APQP and PPAP 5
OpExPro AIAG VDA FMEA Rating Tables FMEA and Control Plans 5
K RPN/ KC) per AIAG FMEA and Control Plans 0
OpExPro The note at the bottom of DFMEA occurrence tables in AIAG VDA FMEA FMEA and Control Plans 0
OpExPro AIAG VDA DFMEA Template Required FMEA and Control Plans 6
M "Issue & continuous improvement" columns in AIAG-VDA PFMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 4
C AIAG-VDA PFMEA - 1st special Characteristics? [5step vs. 6step] FMEA and Control Plans 3
Anerol C Gage R&R Template AIAG 4th Edition IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
J Which OEM or customers are now requiring the new AIAG/VDA FMEA format? FMEA and Control Plans 7
C AIAG/VDA FMEA - Is the new better? FMEA and Control Plans 0
A PFMEA new AIAG FMEA and Control Plans 0
P VDA AIAG FMEA - Slides for Quality Audience FMEA and Control Plans 4
B AIAG/VDA’s FMEA Manual Is a Major Advance (my take on this subject) FMEA and Control Plans 2
B AIAG-VDA FMEA - When the new format will be required FMEA and Control Plans 6
M How to complete structure Analysis and Function analysis sections' columns of AIAG-VDA DFMEA form FMEA and Control Plans 0
bobdoering Informational New AIAG PFMEA Process - Excel Template Attached FMEA and Control Plans 28
C FMEA Process assessment In the Draft for the AIAG/VDA FMEA Manual is gone FMEA and Control Plans 0
S AIAG CQI Auditor Qualification and 3rd Party Certification Requirements General Auditing Discussions 2
K AIAG/VDA FMEA & Process Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 0
D FMEA-MSR in the AIAG-VDA Aligned Handbook - What is it? FMEA and Control Plans 5
bobdoering AIAG VDA FMEA Handbook - 2019 - something familiar about this.... FMEA and Control Plans 37
S New AIAG FMEA Process - How to complete the new format FMEA and Control Plans 32
C Detection Action for Failure Effects - AIAG 4th Edition Layout FMEA and Control Plans 5
S I have just purchased the all new Core Tools Software (CTS) from AIAG IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 39
J AIAG PPAP: 2.2.11.3 Acceptance Criteria for Initial Study (page 9, 4th edition) APQP and PPAP 1
M Is there a published List of AIAG members requiring IATF certification ? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
A The FILE recommended by AIAG MSA 4ed for LINEARITY Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
I AIAG 2018 Quality Summit - Is it worth it? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
C AIAG's IATF 16949 section 7.1.5.1.1 - Torque MSA Requirement Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
G AIAG FMEA - Major customers of the FMEA process FMEA and Control Plans 3
R Information on the roll out of the new harmonized DRAFT FMEA AIAG/VDA manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
G ANOVA GR&R: Minitab vs AIAG MSA results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
H Prerequisites for AIAG APQP/PPAP Certification Exam Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
xfngrs What are the VDA equivalents to AIAG manuals? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 1
Marc When will Revision 5 of the AIAG FMEA Manual be released? FMEA and Control Plans 93
S Pre-release version of the upcoming AIAG FMEA Revision 5 FMEA and Control Plans 1
C PPAP Rejection for "MSA-GR&R are not using the latest AIAG format" APQP and PPAP 9
kedarg6500 Excel Spreadsheet for AIAG Example wanted Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom