SBS - The best value in QMS software

Alone to get my company certified!!!

J

Joe Cruse

#11
To go with the others,

look at what is already down and see if it is workable to go towards the 2000 standard. The most important step I'd recommend is to get on the shop floor with the supervisors AND the employees who are doing the work. Compare what the old QMS has to what is being done now to conduct business. Then wrap that into the 2000 requirements. But you have to get out there and get a good sense of what is going on. Get the heads of the departments in your business to help you write out what they do in each department, even if it means they tell you, and you then write it out yourself.

It isn't all that bad an idea to use flow charts, either. You can at least use them to give yourself an idea of how your business' processes flow while you write the QMS. You may not end up using any charts, but they do have their uses, and can be used for the process map in your QMS to show how everything in the business flows. They can also be used for how each department flows.

Good luck,

Joe
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

David Hartman

#12
Tanahy,

If the previously documented QMS has not been maintained/updated since its implementation/development, I would NOT expect it to reflect the current methodologies. You have to keep in mind that a QMS is a "living" organism. The company's methods SHOULD change as process and product improvements are developed (this is a good thing). So don't be discouraged if it appears that they are NOT compliant with the documents on hand, just ensure that what is currently happening meets the intent of the companies policies, external regulations, and the ISO 9001 requirements.

Also be open to "interpretations" of the ISO requirements. It is NOT a prescriptive set of standards, but is a guideline that should be viewed with a jaundiced eye towards what's best for your company, their customers, and your community.
 
T

Tanahy

#13
Thank you ddhartma
Being on the shopfloor is my first step and its working so well now, workers and supervisors are showing very nice attitude especially when they are convinced that we are doing that FOR IMPROVING THE SYSTEM, which will reflect on thier working conditions for sure, some other people are showing a very strange reactions, probably because i am the youngest engineer in the factory, and they have like double my age of experience, :) but oh well, one way or another there must be a way to fit all into the system
thanks for help regards
Tanahy
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#14
Youth has the advantage of not inherently getting caught in the "We've always done it this way" mind set.

It certainly sounds like you are on the right track, and that your coworkers on the floor have given you their support. This is the most important thing.

Good lighting, and safety practices like lifting equipment and clean floors can do wonders for working conditions. I encourage you to look at the workers' comfort as one important means to raising morale and lowering defect rates. It is okay to do this while reviewing the QMS as "Man" is among the most basic factorsa within the Cause-and-Effect analysis for improvement.

Be well!
 
R

Rachel

#15
Tanahy said:
... some other people are showing a very strange reactions, probably because i am the youngest engineer in the factory, and they have like double my age of experience, :) ...
Tanahy,

I can relate! I just started work this past October (graduated from uni last April) and my first major deliverable was to transition the company from QS 9000 to ISO 9001:2000. I was 23 when I started (turned 24 a couple of months ago). Age has been thrown at me on many occasions - not just at this job, but at co-op placements as a student.

The best advice I can give you is LISTEN. When half of the people at your company have been working there longer than you've been alive, you can bet they have some pretty good ideas about how to make things more efficient. I know a lot of engineers - some, my classmates! - who headed into the workforce with a totally cocky attitude, thinking they were going to change the face of the industry - and while initiative is good, there's a way to present it. Contrary to what many of us youngsters think, things *don't* always work out the way the textbook says they will - real life is a completely different playing field than the assume-vacuum-pressure-and-perfect-insulation situations that we experienced as students.

So, my advice - don't get overwhelmed - pick things apart into small chunks that are more chewable and don't choke you - and get feedback from those around you. It's a neat position to be in, getting into a project from the start and having the ability to mould your system into something better - but make sure that you take into consideration the wealth of *real-life* experience around you. They've been doing this job for years - they've got to have tons to tell you!

Just my :2cents: - take it with a grain of salt (preferably on the rim of a margarita!).
Cheers,
-R.
 
C

Carl Keller

#16
Tanahy,

The advice so far has been very good.


Stay Positive- While it is sometimes frustrating, it isn't rocket science. You can do it.

Take it section by section and ask yourself "what do I have to show that supports this requirement?" If you have evidence that you are doing it, don't dwell on it and move on.

Keep it as simple as possible, if you do not need it to meet the standard, don't include it. You can (and will) expand in the future to benefit the business.

Relax- As long as you pay the bill from the registrar, you are going to pass.

Regards,

Carl-
 
W

williamgunn

#17
Tanahy,

I believe you are facing the problems most of Management Representatives face. The top management appoints the MR, and the MR has to do all the work. It is hard should there be no commitment / cooperation from the team. I have seen many of these cases.

My advise is to do things a step at a time. And always try to get involvement of the top management in decion making and pushing the system and people to work. U cant work alone.

Regards.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Shall a new UDI-DI be required when stand-alone software device's version is updated? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Software Release Note - Class A stand alone software medical device IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
S Do we need separate stand alone procedure for Suspect Unapproved Parts? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
SK13485 Can a literature alone be used for the purpose of Clinical Evaluation of a device? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M ISO 14971 and Stand-Alone Diagnostic Software ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
D Microsoft Excel database to Stand-alone software Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
P Is a different 510k is required for each (stand alone) software configurations? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
S Cloud-Based Stand Alone Software - Software Medical Device (Class II) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
K ISO 13485:2016 Self Certification for Class I (annex 9) Stand-Alone Software? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
B Is IEC TR 80002-1:2009 applicable to stand-alone medical device software? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
K UDI "Version or Model" for Stand-Alone Medical Device Software US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
Q IATF 16949 Not a Stand Alone System? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
W Unattached (stand-alone) Forms acceptable for AS9100C? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
K DHR approval requirements for stand-alone software US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
K "Purchasing Controls" for Stand-alone Software US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
A End of Life for Medical Mobile App (Stand Alone Software) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 5
M Requiring action on factors alone of RPN in FMEA APQP and PPAP 7
J Can ANSI Z1.4 sampling plan be used for sampling alone without the Acc/Rej criteria? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
L Device Labeling - Stand Alone Symbols of ISO15223 no longer FDA recognized Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
K Classification of the Reseller of Stand Alone Medical Device Software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K ISO 13485 requirements for Stand Alone Medical Device Software (Class II a) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
bio_subbu MHRA issues guidance on Medical Device stand-alone software (including apps) EU Medical Device Regulations 1
N Which regulations apply to Medical Stand Alone Software in Europe? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K Stand Alone Software definition according to PMDA Japan Medical Device Regulations 3
M CE Marking and use of IEC 80002-1 for Risk Management of Stand Alone Software EU Medical Device Regulations 13
C Direction for Use/ UI for stand alone software Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
C Do they use the same standards: Stand-alone software and embedded software? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 13
S Is it acceptable to have an ASL for Critical suppliers alone? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
A Does EN 60601-1 apply to stand alone software medical devices? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 11
C Stand Alone ISO Certification or Include New Mfg. Line in Current Registration ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
R Stand-Alone Power Supply with Metal Enclosure IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
N Customer Service/Inside Sales Will Not Leave Us (Quality Assurance) Alone! Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
W MEDDEV: Qualification and Classification of Stand Alone Software Published EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S IEC 62366 for Stand-Alone Medical Device Software and Usability Engineering IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 16
Q Can a WI (Work Instruction) be alone without depending on a Procedure? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
R Quality Manual and Procedure Preferences (Stand Alone Documents?) Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 21
I Stand-alone Software as a Medical Device IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
Y How can an Optional Accessory of a Medical Device be sold alone? Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
K Site with only Manufacturing and stand alone ISO 9001 certification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
S Why is the definition of Hazard (OHSAS) focused on Humans alone ? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 13
S Audit and Calibration question - does verification alone meet the requirements? General Auditing Discussions 5
J Looking for stand-alone QMS manual & procedures for ISO 14001 as a guidance document. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
T MSDS Software - Anyone know of any affordable, yet good, stand alone MSDS software? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 6
A Regulation that prohibits person from working alone on electrical equipment? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 23
M Stand alone software package out there for creating a FMEA - Laptop Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 4
M Transferring ISO 17025 from one company to another ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
P Audit check for IT company (ISO 9001) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
lanley liao Does all of the suppliers need to integrated into the supplier list qualified of the company? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
F IVD registration in EU - Northern Ireland based company EU Medical Device Regulations 0
W Where does a coatings and paint company fall in IATF? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom