Alpha and Beta in the Sampling Plan for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

ifserav

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hi to everibody?

Do you know waht are the alpha and beta in the sampling plan for ISO 2859 and ISO 3951?

Thanks in advance

Sergio ?vila
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

ifserav

Involved In Discussions
#2
alpha and beta in validation sampling plan

Hi to everibody?
I want to know if there is a requirement about apha and beta when you develpo a sampling plan for validation of a process?

Thanks in advance
Sergio ?vila
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#3
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

First the referenced ISO standards are intended for acceptance sampling of material and are NOT appropriate for determining the sample sizes for validation of processes (or of products)

To answer your direct question in terms of acceptance sampling:
  • alpha is 1-probability of rejecting a lot when it is at the acceptable defect rate (AQL); in other words it is the probability that the sample size will contain an unusually high number of defects resulting in the conclusion that the process is more defective than it actually is.
  • beta is 1-probability of accepting a lot when it is at the rejectable defect rate (RQL - aslo called UQL or LQ); in other words it is the probability that the sample size will contain an unusually low number of defects resulting in the conclusion that the process is less defective than it actually is.
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#4
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

I believe AQL is at 95% so alpha=0.05 and LQ is at 10% or a beta of 0.10.

First the referenced ISO standards are intended for acceptance sampling of material and are NOT appropriate for determining the sample sizes for validation of processes (or of products)

To answer your direct question in terms of acceptance sampling:
  • alpha is 1-probability of rejecting a lot when it is at the acceptable defect rate (AQL); in other words it is the probability that the sample size will contain an unusually high number of defects resulting in the conclusion that the process is more defective than it actually is.
  • beta is 1-probability of accepting a lot when it is at the rejectable defect rate (RQL - aslo called UQL or LQ); in other words it is the probability that the sample size will contain an unusually low number of defects resulting in the conclusion that the process is less defective than it actually is.
 

ifserav

Involved In Discussions
#5
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

Thank you so much, what i want to know is if are there any guidelines to stablish alpha and beta for a validation sampling plan and what are the values of alpha and beta in the ISO norms?
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#6
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

:topic:
I believe AQL is at 95% so alpha=0.05 and LQ is at 10% or a beta of 0.10.
This is the default level used since the Mil-Std was developed when AQL was deemed more important than RQL since producers wanted to be more biased towards accepting than rejecting. (yes the Mil-Std was as much a result of negotiation as it was statistics)

There is no need to stay at those levels. The severity of the effect of the defect and it's usage should drive the choice of alpha and beta...
 

Statistical Steven

Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#7
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

:topic:

This is the default level used since the Mil-Std was developed when AQL was deemed more important than RQL since producers wanted to be more biased towards accepting than rejecting. (yes the Mil-Std was as much a result of negotiation as it was statistics)

There is no need to stay at those levels. The severity of the effect of the defect and it's usage should drive the choice of alpha and beta...
Bev -

I am in violent agreement :lol::applause:

Problem is that the standards (ISO, MIL-STD, etc.) are tabled for AQL at 95% and LQ at 10%. It kinda sticks!
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#8
Re: Alpha and beta for ISO 2859 & ISO 3951

Thank you so much, what i want to know is if are there any guidelines to stablish alpha and beta for a validation sampling plan and what are the values of alpha and beta in the ISO norms?
So Steven answered the "ISO norms" for alpha (5%) and beta (10%). But many people are realizing that these 'defaults' or 'norms' aren't always useful for their application. The real choice depends on the severity of the effect. for example a defect that could kill someone should have a very low beta because even small defect rates are not acceptable.

HOWEVER, I must stress again that acceptance samplign methods are NOT applicable for validation of processes. the sample size will be much too small because the question that is being asked by the statistics is very different.

Acceptance sampling is intended to have only a few defects found in the sample to make a decision on whether the lot is most likely at or below (or above) a specified defect rate.

Validation testing is intended to determine with some precision the actual defect rate and that requires larger sample sizes so a different formula is used. You still need to determine alpha and beta risks, but these values go into a different formula.

Can you clarify / describe what you are trying to do?
 
Last edited:

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
#10
the actual defect rate for what?

an ongoing process is different than for a validation test...

In a validation test you determine what defect rate you cannot tolerate. Then you decide on your alpha and beta levels and the precison that you want for your estimate.

In the case of validation testing, alpha is the risk of seeing a statistically significant difference that doesn't exist and beta is the risk that you don't see a statistically significant deifference that does exist. The precision is (delta or D) essentially the amount of +/- error you want in your estimate of the defect rate.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D LTPD, Alpha and Beta for this plan. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 12
B Weibull Model - Reliability Analysis - Alpha, Beta & gamma value formulas Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
D TUR's to alpha / beta risk factors Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Marc Errors - Uncertainty Type I, II, or Alpha, Beta vs. Gage R&R Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
V Alpha Value while augmenting from Factorial --> RSM - (Question) Using Minitab Software 6
I Choosing the alpha level in an ANOVA Study Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
J Moving Range Upper and Lower Control Limits when alpha=0.002 Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
A Wolfram Alpha - A new 'search' engine is online After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 7
R Document and Quality Manual Revision Control requirements - Alpha or Numeric Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
S MSA Analysis - Bias one sample method - Significance of t (v, 1-alpha/2) , V, d2 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
N Is alpha in UCI LCI formula constant or depend on sample size? (MSA Manual) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
chris1price Sterilization using beta radiation Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
shimonv 'Beta testing' & Design Controls 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
S Need help wrapping my head around confidence vs beta error Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
K What is the Beta RISK for S chart OF XBAR-S chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 0
shimonv Classification of Complaints from Beta Sites - Complaints Definition per QSR 820.3 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
A Beta Testing FDA Regulated Medical Device Software vs. Nonconforming product? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
M Does anyone have an electronic Gamma and Beta Table Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
kisxena Beta Trial While 510(k) is Being Reviewed 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
Stijloor Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 5 keeps crashing After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 5
B Software Beta Testing - Sample test plan or procedure wanted Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 5
D Beta > 1 for new design? Durability test for a new system and no previous test data Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
A Inference for Regression Slope in Minitab - Significance test for Beta Using Minitab Software 0
Marc CrossOver public beta: Allows Windows apps to run without Windows on Intel-based Macs After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Claes Gefvenberg Vista beta 2 available. If you dare... After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 4
S Whether the word BETA means prototype samples or the Production samples IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
Wes Bucey IE 7 Beta - your experience? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 8
Marc Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2 Preview - Bug reports are flooding in After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 3
M Quality and Customer Satisfaction - Is beta testing required? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 11
D What is beta software? Software Quality Assurance 1
C Statistics/sampling plan for medical device Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
G Acceptance sampling by variables - Do Minitab use one sided k only? Why? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 0
Bev D Acceptance Inspection Sampling Plan Calculators Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
Q Control Plan and the frequency of sampling FMEA and Control Plans 11
F Attribute sampling plan ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
M What is the Risk of Using Obsolete Versions of C=0 & ANSI/ ASQ Z1.4 Sampling Plans? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
R Customer feedbacks sampling size EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Mixing criteria and sampling Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
W What would you consider "representative sampling" for PT/ILC? ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
G Calculating Ppk for Design Verification - Variable Sampling Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
J Medical Device Component Change - Testing, Sampling Criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
D Is sampling allowed for MDR Class III products? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
B Inspection of polymer palletes - sampling plan Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
A Class IIb implantable-TD sampling plan EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M How to Develop a Sampling Plan for Drug Substance? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
S Stability sampling for Class 1 medical devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J Internal audit random sampling methodology Internal Auditing 2
B Sampling strategies/techniques for software QA Software Quality Assurance 3
D ANSI/ASQC Z1.9 VS MIL-STD-1916 for Continuous Sampling Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
M Detection rank for sampling vs 100% inspection & 15x vs 400x magnification FMEA and Control Plans 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom