Trusted Information Resource
So I finally got curious and took a look. I found this document useless from a regulatory perspective, because, unless I missed something, it doesn't identify the harms associated with the risks.
Oh good, my second opportunity to rant about this today. IMO, anyone really qualified to make this determination would tell you that trying to quantify the severity associated with a clinical harm makes no clinical sense whatsoever In this case, it's just plain weird, because you don't even know what harms are being rated. It's like, well, if some kind of harm occurred, then whatever kind of harm it might be, it would have a severity of 2.
Engineering associates are typically not qualified to make a determination as what types of injury require professional medical intervention.