# Analysis of DOE Results and Model Finalization

#### v9991

Trusted Information Resource
How to resolve following situation?
1. i find the model-significant; lack of fit-non significant; but curvature-significant.
problem, is that how to assess the curvature. (design already has enough center points); should we go for CCD?

the results are pretty much fine...is there a way to build argument to conclude the model without exploring the curvature part?

2. i find 4 factors of 'equal effect', but their quantum of effect is not significant; You can imagine them to be a tower one of over other on the half normal plot...how to handle them....

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
Staff member
1. The logical next step would be to augment your experiment by adding axial points to create a CCD, either a circumscribed (preferred) or face centered (if levels are restricted) design. You should add additional centerpoints because this will create a second block, and you will need the center points to detect a potential block effect.
2. Not sure what you mean by quantum of effect. Can you attach the ANOVA table and half normal plot?

#### v9991

Trusted Information Resource
1. The logical next step would be to augment your experiment by adding axial points to create a CCD, either a circumscribed (preferred) or face centered (if levels are restricted) design. You should add additional centerpoints because this will create a second block, and you will need the center points to detect a potential block effect.
2. Not sure what you mean by quantum of effect. Can you attach the ANOVA table and half normal plot?
1. is there any way to conclude without extending the CCD or resolving the curvature part of the model.
2. am enclosing the half normal plot.
Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]
Sum of Mean F p-value
Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F
Model 52.00 2 26.00 57.20 < 0.0001 significant
A- 50.00 1 50.00 110.00 < 0.0001
B- 2.00 1 2.00 4.40 0.0692
Residual 3.64 8 0.45
Lack of Fit 2.97 6 0.49 1.48 0.4553 not significant
Pure Error 0.67 2 0.33
Cor Total 55.64 10

#### Attachments

• 42.4 KB Views: 182

#### Miner

##### Forum Moderator
Staff member
I do not see a significant curvature term.

#### v9991

Trusted Information Resource
I do not see a significant curvature term.
yes, curvature was a different doe-analysis
and the second ANOVA + half normal plot is different DOE-study.

S DOE Analysis - Experiments with 5 Factors Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
H Minitab DOE Analysis of Data and Transforming Using Minitab Software 4
J DOE Analysis Experiment, 5 factors, 4 factors having 3 levels, and 1 factor having 5 Using Minitab Software 38
B Analyze 'Factorial Design' or 'Variability' - Difference when used for DOE Analysis? Using Minitab Software 1
Taguchi DOE Analysis - What S/N ratio (Nominal is best or smaller is better) to use? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
V Identifying Significant Factors - Regression Analysis vs Correlation vs ANOVA vs DOE Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 7
R Custom DOE (Design of Experiments) Analysis in JMP Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
A Shainin vs. Fisher vs. Taguchi DOE (Design of Experiments) Statistical Analysis Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 10
T Any recommendation on DOE/Statistical Analysis Software? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
Risk Analysis and Probability of Occurrence ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
Risk analysis for defective measuring or measuring equipment out of calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Benefit risk analysis on pFMEA ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 9
Process map Evaluation and Analysis Method Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
QMS monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation requirement - Template ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
How to perform verification of the Statistical Analysis Software? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 7
Starting a Weibull Analysis: Source on how to perform Weibull Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
ISO 10360-5: 2020 Gap analysis and Action plan Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 1
IATF audit - Root Cause Analysis results IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
MDR Gap Analysis - Consultant fees EU Medical Device Regulations 10
Overall Benefit/Risk Analysis - Risk Management VS Clinical Evaluation ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
Forklift Reliability Analysis Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
Tactics for Root Cause Analysis Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 4
How to correctly understand the bullet list d) of 6.3 Analysis of Data for API Spec Q1 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 7
The term "Benefit Risk Ratio" in EU MDR, do I need to present benefit risk analysis as a RATIO Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 4
Two excellent examples of process capability analysis from Quality Magazine Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5
Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
Attribute Analysis for colour matching scale Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
Recurrent event analysis software (python) General Auditing Discussions 2
Normal Condition Hazards in Risk Analysis ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
MDSAP and 13485:2016 gap analysis Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
Gap analysis on ISO 14971:2019 with previous revision ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 12
Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
ECG Risk Analysis Standards ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
Root Cause Failure Analysis - Not following Customer packaging Specification Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 9
ISO 13485:2016 Gap Analysis by NB ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Capability analysis - What is going on this chart? Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
Documenting Risk Control Option Analysis ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 8
Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
Analysis variation among the lots during cpk calculation. Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
Best practice for identifying "items" of parts for DFMEA analysis AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
Looking for a EU MDR Gap Analysis template EU Medical Device Regulations 6
B Has anyone done an IEC 60601-1 gap analysis to IEC 60335? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
What is PESTLE Analysis and is it mandatory? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Root Cause Analysis as Training ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
Interesting Discussion Analysis of half normal distribution in minitab Using Minitab Software 11
IATF 16949 (6.1.1 - Planning and Risk Analysis for a remote site) Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
Risk Analysis & Technical File - What detail goes in the Risk Management Report ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
Struggling with a root cause analysis - Customer Returns - Escape issue Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 15
10993-11 vs 2006 gap analysis Other Medical Device Related Standards 2