Any comment, if a supplier raise an NCR to the Client?

N

Nadeem A.

#1
Hi All,

Within the context of oil and gas business, some construction contractors has an understanding to raise the NCR against the "Client" if there is a discrepancy or ambiguity in the Client requirement.

In my view point, it seems very awkward to raise an NCR against the Client/Customer, who is giving a business to the Contractor.

One of the requirements in ISO 9001:2015 QMS is to 'Review the Customer Requirements'. Contractor can communicate to the Client for any unclear requirement using other tools such as Request for Information (RFI) or any other process. But, in general, to raise the NCR to the Client may have negative impact to the contractor business (such as losing the next contract).

Any thought or comment would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Nadeem.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

dsanabria

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
While technically it is correct to issue an NCR - realistically, I would not hold my breath in expecting an answer to the NCR.

Usually an NCR is a tool to be used when all other communication forms have been exhausted and the results are still the same.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#3
In limited fashion, I've seen a situation like this when the supplier rejected a customer supplied product, which was found to be unfit for the job. Standards, such as ISO 9001:2015 have requirements concerning such check.

If you provide more details of what was rejected by the supplier and subject of the NCR, we might be able to opine further and offer additional comments.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
... Within the context of oil and gas business, some construction contractors has an understanding to raise the NCR against the "Client" if there is a discrepancy or ambiguity in the Client requirement.

In my view point, it seems very awkward to raise an NCR against the Client/Customer, who is giving a business to the Contractor.

One of the requirements in ISO 9001:2015 QMS is to 'Review the Customer Requirements'. Contractor can communicate to the Client for any unclear requirement using other tools such as Request for Information (RFI) or any other process. But, in general, to raise the NCR to the Client may have negative impact to the contractor business (such as losing the next contract)...
The client, as I can see, is a very keen interested party to your QMS operation. So his needs and expectations have to be considered. Therefore if any discrepancy or ambiguity is noticed in the client requirement at any point of time, it is in the best interest of the contractor and the client that this is resolved to the satisfaction of the contractor (yourself) first. This is correction.
Whether a corrective action is taken up by the client is not in the contractor's QMS interest.
Therefore the action to get the correction done using a NCR process should be OK. No more than that. However, the means of correction can be many, but the purpose is to communicate a NC situation and get the same resolved. Certainly your NCR process is not made with the client in mind.
Communicate, Call over phone, Meet, Escalate., to correct the situation, but NCR is not the preferred route.
 
Last edited:

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
... Within the context of oil and gas business, some construction contractors has an understanding to raise the NCR against the "Client" if there is a discrepancy or ambiguity in the Client requirement.

In my view point, it seems very awkward to raise an NCR against the Client/Customer, who is giving a business to the Contractor.

One of the requirements in ISO 9001:2015 QMS is to 'Review the Customer Requirements'. Contractor can communicate to the Client for any unclear requirement using other tools such as Request for Information (RFI) or any other process. But, in general, to raise the NCR to the Client may have negative impact to the contractor business (such as losing the next contract)...
Nadeem,

We had good results with an RFI process when requesting clarification of acceptance criteria.

The Requests for Information were usually part of design change control.

We kept our NCRs dry for controlling nonconforming product which may also invoke design changes if dispositioned "use as is" or "repair".

The NCR may replace the RFI but why take the hard road?

As you can tell I would not recommend it.

John
 
N

Nadeem A.

#6
Thanks all for providing comments. Agreed with Somashekar and John, why take the hard and risky way, if you have different tools of communication available.

Like the following lines:
...................................................
Certainly your NCR process is not made with the client in mind.
Communicate, Call over phone, Meet, Escalate., to correct the situation, but NCR is not the preferred route.
This make sense as if we look at the 'Continual Improvement of QMS Model', Client/Customer is providing the requirements to the organization to construct and deliver the product to satisfy the Client's expectations. This is organization's (Contractor) responsibility to review and meet the customer requirements and expectations.

If the Client has provided wrong material or specification (customer property), then Contractor could 'Reject' that material/specification using any reporting format (e.g. Material Receiving Report, RFI, any other communication tool). Or raise a Change Order. Organizations depend on their customers, therefore should understand current and future customer needs, one of the basic QMS principle. The intention should be to make customer satisfied using prudent ways.


Thanks,
Nadeem.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Risk Approach doesn't address External Issues (Auditor's Comment) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 30
B Checklist for ISO/TS16949 for review and comment IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
Ninja Blind Gopher Auditors Comment - Who is responsible? Registrars and Notified Bodies 23
R ISO 13485 Mind Map attached - Please review and comment ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
B Product Realisation Process Map - Need some help, please review and comment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R 3rd Party Audit Comment - Identify ISO Clauses/Sub Clauses to each Process Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 45
Q Renewal Audit comment and question General Auditing Discussions 8
M Aim to be compliant, Quality Manual comment? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 9
S Gage R&R (GRR) Study - Please comment on the results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
B Laboratory Layout - Please comment & give ideas on my proposal General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
P Please comment on revision status of document on a per page basis Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 25
W Global Phased PPAP and APQP Training - Please Review and Comment Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 8
C Integrated Quality EHS&S (ISO 9001:2000 and RC14001) Manual for comment Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 6
A Our Quality Policy and Objectives - Please review and comment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
N Hotel comment cards go paperless - Are any of you a Hilton or Marriot guest? Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 14
Wes Bucey Bribery vs. extortion - your comment? World News 23
M Process Mapping Approach - Please comment on my process map Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 10
T Please Comment on my Document Control Procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
K Quality Manual Review - Please Review my QMS Manual and Comment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M Training and Development Procedure - Please Review and Comment Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
E Product Audit Corncern...Please comment IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J Seeking comment for our company's process map Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4
Claes Gefvenberg Internal Audit Process Flow Chart - Please Review Mine and Comment! Internal Auditing 27
CarolX Review / Comment: ISO 9001:2000 Explained - By Tsiakals, Cianfrani and West Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 0
Proud Liberal COMMENT - Newbie Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
Marc A2LA Contact and Guide 25 Comment - NOTE: Guide 25 is long since dead and buried General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
G Dealing with non conformity caused by Supplier Components detected in the production line IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
G Supplier doesn't accept the complaints Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 19
K New supplier audit as per V3.1 by French Automotive OEM General Auditing Discussions 2
A ASL requirement when the supplier is certified for ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Approved supplier list for R&D ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M SemaTech SSQA Standardized Supplier Quality Assessment - my favorite tool ever Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
D Supplier Quality level category help - high level ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
J Supplier Controlled Shipping (GM CS1) Condition Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
L Supplier within the Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Supplier Quality - How to classify a supplier level Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
P Understanding DFMEA and PFMEA - Supplier Related IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
S Can assembly manufacturing sub-supplier be certified IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M How Supplier Capacity check is done by competitors Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
C One Time Service Supplier - Temperature and Humidity Testing Service ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Supplier Audits - Stop Wasting Everyone's Time! General Auditing Discussions 15
G Supplier management when the supplier is your headquarter IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
V Supplier wants to perform pre-qualifications prior to every run instead of locking in parameters. Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
D Class 3 Device - Change of supplier of material Canada Medical Device Regulations 6
D List A IVD - Change to material supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Minimum Supplier Certifications for Food Supplements Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 3
R Supplier/Vendor Surveys (360) Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
was named killer AS9100 Supplier Approval Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
B AS9100 8.4.1 Supplier Selection/Evaluation criteria and reevaluations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13

Similar threads

Top Bottom