Traditions are made to be broken
Hey Claes ! Thanks for soliciting some positive energy in this bizzre world we live in. I offer the following:
My only success stories (and huge successes by the way) are an upshot from non-traditional Auditing approaches.
1. Not employing people called auditors, rather determining whether our Quality Management System conforms to planned arrangements, is effectively implemented, maintained and improved upon, via integrating these requirements into our Management Review program. “Auditing” is Management’s Responsibility. Other people in the company need to focus on day-to-day operations.
2. When pseudo-traditional auditing techniques may be used, only visual style Process Instructions (pictures, flow charts, etc) are used. Time-honored, protracted, multi-level bullets, utilizing oblique vernacular and wooly semantics add 0 value to any organization, period.
It works, it conforms, it adds values, it's simple. Auditors hate it !
