APLAC - A2LA - ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 (1997) - 17025 - Laboratory Proficiency Testing

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
Laboratory Proficiency Testing

> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:12:30 EDT
> Subject: Re: NO NEED FOR PROFICIENCY TESTING
>
> What if no one else out in this large world performs your type of proficiency
> testing? We for example perform Irradiance calibrations of Xenon Arc sources,
> how do we participate where there are no others?
>
> Bob Buerger
> Atlas Electric Devices
> 773-327-3005 ext. 477

----------------

Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 19:02:35 -0500
From: George Kugler
To: Greg Gogates
Subject: Re: NO NEED FOR PROFICIENCY TESTING RE1

Hello All,

With reference to proficiency testing.

Guide 25 states the definition in section 3.15, where appropriate in 4.2.j, reference to in 5.2.n, participation in in sections 5.6.b and 9.3.

The definition in section 3.15 as copied from the Standard states "Determination of the laboratory calibration or testing performance by means of interlaboratory comparisons."

I take this to mean that proficiency testing is defined as interlaboratory comparisons and that the latter applies.

I would like to hear comments regarding this as I believe proficiency testing is interlaboratory comparisons.

Somewhat confused.

George Kugler
Automation Concepts

---------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 06:17:28 -0400
From: "Kenneth A. Grams"
To: Greg Gogates
Subject: Re: Accuracy

Mike,

The practice of measuring a .000020 tolerance hole with a gage pin regardless of the pins accuracy is not usually considered good practice. It is very difficult to put a pin that has a diameter of .0001"-.0002" smaller into a hole. Secondly, reaming does not generate a hole with that tolerance. It usually has to be jig ground and lapped. For example, your typical XX Class ring gages are made to that .000020" tolerance and they are defininately not reamed! The normal practice is using air gages or dial bore gages with the appropriate indicator. The problem you may encounter is that the hole size may not lend itself to this method. When dealing with holes smaller that .25, an air gage is about your only choice. The pins will only get you in the "BALLPARK". Forget the pins!

Ken Grams CMM Services, Inc
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:45:21 -0400
From: "Peter S. Unger"
To: 'Greg Gogates'
Subject: RE: NO NEED FOR PROFICIENCY TESTING RE6

To dispel the possible misunderstanding that proficiency testing is not required by laboratory accreditation bodies, I thought it best to share with you the APLAC (Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) Policy on Proficiency Testing Requirements approved at the APLAC General Assembly meeting in October 1998:

3.3 Proficiency testing and other interlaboratory comparisons

(a) An applicant body to the APLAC MRA for calibration and/or for testing needs to demonstrate the technical competence of its accredited laboratories by their satisfactory participation in proficiency testing activity where such activity is available. The minimum amount of appropriate proficiency testing required per laboratory is:- one activity prior to gaining accreditation; one activity relating to each major part of their scope of accreditation at least every four years.

Note 1. Appropriate proficiency testing activity includes international or national interlaboratory comparison or measurement audits run or approved by the accreditation body itself. Preference should be given to international interlaboratory comparisons (i.e., APLAC, EA or equivalent) where these are available.

Note 2. Four years is the maximum interval. Accreditation bodies are encouraged to shorten that interval where there are significant changes to a laboratory's staff or scope of accreditation.

Note 3. An applicant body should use proficiency testing programs which comply with the operational procedures detailed in ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 (1997).

Note 4. An applicant body should fully document its policies and procedures in relation to the selection and use of proficiency testing programs (refer ISO/IEC Guide 43-2 (1997)).

(b) An applicant body needs to demonstrate that the proficiency testing its accredited or applicant laboratories undertake is effective, linked to the assessment process and that appropriate corrective action is carried out when necessary.

(c) APLAC runs proficiency testing programmes and interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) in some fields of testing and calibration. Every applicant or signatory to the MRAs for calibration and testing shall participate, as far as available and practicable, in order to verify the competence of its accredited laboratories.

The European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) has similar requirements. Proficiency testing is one of the major confidence building activities undertaken by EA and APLAC among the signatories to their respective mutual recognition arrangements (MRAs). An applicant accreditation body to either the APLAC MRA or EA MRAs must participate and satisfactorily complete recognized proficiency testing activity as a prerequisite before acceptance as a signatory can be extended. The developing MRA of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation *(ILAC) is likely to have similar requirements for proficiency testing activity.

Proficiency testing is not only a good tool to be used by laboratories to ascertain their performance against others, I trust it is now well understood that it is a fundamental evaluation tool used by accreditation bodies to demonstrate satisfactory performance of its accredited labs. When that performance is determined to be unsatisfactory, then appropriate corrective actions need to be implemented and reviewed. So when proficiency testing is available and deemed appropriate and directly relevant to a laboratory's scope of accreditation, participation is required.

Sincerely,

Peter Unger
A2LA President
5301 Buckeystown Pike, Suite 350
Frederick, MD 21704
Direct Line: 301 644 3212; Fax: 301 662 2974
Web: www.a2la.org
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ajit Basrur Informational Merger of PAC and APLAC to form the Asia Pacific Accreditation Cooperation (APAC) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Hershal PJLA invited to join APLAC MRA General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
Hershal Congratulations to L-A-B - Invited to join the APLAC MRA as a Signatory Body General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
J L-A-B Signs APLAC Mutual Recogition Agreement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Hershal APLAC News Notes August 2006 on-line World News 0
D Accreditation Scheme:relationships between ANSI, NIST, NCSL, ILAC, APLAC, NCCLS, etc. General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
R Do I need A2LA Accreditation? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
C Environmental Temperature Chamber Testing & A2LA requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D A2LA Certification and moving to a new Facility General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Q Adding to our A2LA Scope of Accreditation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
G A2LA's ISO/IEC 17025 and Accreditation Training - Opinions from previous attendees ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
QMMike TS 16949 - A2LA or ISO/IEC 17025 required for material testing? ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
S A2LA requirements for Electrical Uncertainty Budgets - Measurements with a slope Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
A ILAC explanation - IEC60601-1 testing certified by an A2LA laboratory IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S Calibration of equipment in an A2LA accredited testing laboratory General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
E A2LA Proficiency Test Requirement help needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
O When do we need to be A2LA/ISO 17025 certified? ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
E A2LA Laboratory Management Requirements or Qualifications General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
M When can you be "accredited" and not be "accredited" with A2LA? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
S A2LA Calibration Program Requirements, September 2005 II. Section 2.1.3.b.3 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
gard2372 A2LA & ISO/IEC 17025:1999 vs. European Requirements ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
R AS7101 for Materials Testing - Is this similar to 17025 or A2LA? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
J A2LA vs. other accreditors General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
T Field Decay Test - Can any one recommend few independent and A2lA accredited labs? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
T Providing A2LA w/ Proficiency Test results General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
S Looking for company to calibrate cutting dies with A2LA, IAS, or NVLAP accreditation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
J A2LA here, my boss wants to open China office now General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Hershal A2LA has completely terminated involvement in NACLA General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
W ISO 17025 or A2LA, what?s this?? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
D If you are TS16949 certified, it also covers A2LA certification? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S Labels identifying accredited standards - Considering making labels with A2LA Logo General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Maintaining and tracking laboratory voltage standards - A2LA audit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
V Is A2LA the US National equivalent to ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
D A2LA vs. NADCAP - Could someone explain the differences? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 17
Q Seeking: A2LA to ISO 17025 Audit Template ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
F Which NAVLAP or A2LA Laboratory Accreditation Body? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
C Differences and similarities between ISO 17025 and A2LA certification? ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
K A2LA laboratory requirements General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
R 17025, guide 25, A2LA (cal.,meas.,antest) ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
L A2LA - Sending testing to a non-accredited lab if customer doesn't require A2LA? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Marc A2LA has a Traceability Policy that was issued 08/2000 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
D A2LA/ISO GUIDE 25 QUALIFIED LABS WITH FLOW CALIBRATION IN THIER SCOPE General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Marc NVLAP and A2LA Guide 25 Interpretations General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Marc NVLAP vs. A2LA - NVLAP policy on acceptance of calibration laboratories General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Marc A2LA Contact and Guide 25 Comment - NOTE: Guide 25 is long since dead and buried General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
O In addition to the standard, what other ISO 13485 sources do people recommend? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Watchcat ISO 13485 for IVD (In-vitro Diagnostic Device) Manufacturers? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
G New to ISO 9001 - Where to begin? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
BeaBea Interesting Discussion Where Does Marketing/ Advertisement of Products fit in to ISO 9001? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 35
G ISO 17025-2017 Management Review reporting items - Inputs ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom