Applicability of 4.9 When Design is Product

J

j r moses

#1
i am involved in the development of the Quality Management System for a small company (20 employees) which is designing Plants for waste water treatment based on the specific requirements of the customers.
my client has the option of offering design alone or also supply equipment based on its own design and also take up installation / commissioning of the plant.

recenrtly we had the system audited by an external auditor who raised comments that the system did not adequately address requirements of section 4.9.

our argument is : there is no manufacturing involved. the section on 4.9 in our procedure adequately covers activities involving project planning and execution, operational requirements for maintaining the plant supplied and periodical inspection / analysisof the samples from the effluent after treatment.

is our argument valid ?
or
are we missing something important?

thanks

dr p r madhavan
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
C

Christian Lupo

#2
I guess it would depend on the specific issues raised by the auditor. 4.9 does apply even though you are not a manufacturer, it is harder to address and it's possible that the auditor does not have adequate experience in your SIC code. But w/o specifics its difficult to tell if the auditor made the wrong decision.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#3
I want to ask a few people about this. I'll respond in a day or two.

How about you other folks reading this thread? Ideas? Experiences with a company whose product is a design?
 

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
Design is the process so 4.4 is extended to include the requirements of 4.9 as would any service organization's be extended....as in your extended scope......your sales and installation for instance need to met the requirements of 4.9.

There is no way, short of an audit, to tell if you were compliant or not.....words out of context are difficult at best to interpret.

This is one of the more difficult scenarios for an auditor....without experience in that field, they could do more damage than good. You need to understand where they are coming from and why they feel it was inadequately covered in order to make a decision.
 
J

Jase Eyre

#5
I agree with Barb on this one. I have worked with a company whose 'products' are designs. Section 4.4 (~7.3 in the 2000 revision)applies without question, but 4.9 (~7.5) presents problems insofar as the requirements in this clause appear to be duplications of 4.4 (because design IS production in this case and have already been addressed). Surely the Standard doesn't want to do all this again?

Well, no. The Standard is merely being comprehensive. The problem of compliance can be overcome by bundling together 4.4 and 4.9 (or 7.3 and 7.5) in a single set of procedures or practices. Often, measures applied to comply with 4.4 also address the requirements of 4.9. This simply has to be made explicit to your registrar and demonstrated in your documentation.

Jase

------------------
JasE
 
D

dr madhavan

#6
In his book titled " ISO 9001 for Engineers and Designers (published by McGraw-Hill)", the Author - Stephen J Schoonmaker, lists the requirements for designers/engineers as Clauses: 4.2.1,4.2.3
4.1.1,4.1.2.1,4.1.2.3,4.1.2.2,4.1.3,
4.3,
4.4.2,4.4.4,4.4.6,4.4.7,4.4.8,4.4.9,
4.10 and 4.11.

does it mean that we do not consider 4.9 at all? there is no reference to this clause in his entire book for designers!
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#7
I would map the 4.9 requirements (as applicable) to your 4.4 procedures. You could do this on your quality manual. Where it is obvious that a 4.9 element doesn't apply, say so in your map or quality manual.
 
M
#8
I would suggest a process-approach to documenting your management system, in which you follow your practices rather than clauses of the standard. Ensure that all requirements in ISO9001 are considered when documenting your processes, but in a way that remains relevant to the business. If your auditor is asking where the requirements of 4.9 are addressed, he/she needs a kick in the pants or else does not have appropriate experience to audit within your industry (as someone has already suggested).
The 2000 revision is a good attempt to making ISO9001 a process-based structure, and has less emphasis on "documented procedures", allowing you more flexibility to rely on qualifications, training records and customer feedback to prove (objective evidence) you have your processes under control. This will force auditors to be more aware of the industry practices without relying on your procedures and then robotically quoting from ISO9001 where he/she cannot find those words in your procedure. It will be both interesting and a challenge as we move towards 9k2k.
 
D

dewie

#9
IMHO the design company is ISO9002 because his product is what he designs. The process is how he does design.
In case that he wanna be ISO9001, his product is the drawing. The process is after he has finished verifying his design.
Is this a fool idea?
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#10
That won't fly. Whether design is your product or if it is part of your process, you have to address 4.4.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
DuncanGibbons Understanding the applicability of Design of Experiments to the IQ OQ PQ qualification approach Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
A AS9100C Clause 7.5 Applicability for Design House AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
B AS9100 Section Applicability for a Design Center's Technical Publications Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
P DOE (Design of Experiments) or Hypothesis test? Applicability and use of each? Six Sigma 6
F Applicability of 7.3 Design to Assembly Operations Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
K Applicability of Cybersecurity EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.4(ab), 14.2(d) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
K Applicability of eIFU as per EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.1 CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
R MDD x PPE Directive - Statement of Non-Applicability EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B Exclusions or justification for non-applicability of IEC standards Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
A Software as Medical Device (SaMD) definition and its applicability Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
N EU MDR - Applicability Article 22 Systems and Procedure Packs CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
R Applicability of new non-harmonized standards (MDD/MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
A MDR Article 22 applicability - Legal manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 6
K Diagnostic X-ray devices - Applicability of Biocompatibility Testing per ISO 10993-1 Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
V Applicability of IEC 62366-1 usability to resorbable bone substitutes IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 9
E Commission Regulation (EU) No. 207/2012 E-IFU Applicability EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M ROHS : Applicability for AIMDs RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 2
L Dying a slow SCOPE death - NEW ISO APG Paper on Scope and Applicability May 2020. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
M Applicability of Means of Protection, working voltage in an Automated External Defibrillator IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
M Applicability of IEC 60950-1 Table K2 - Minimum clearances between circuits Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
R Applicability of ISO 14708-3 RF Transmitter and Implantable RF Receiver Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
R Applicability of ISO 14708-3 - RF transmitter and implantable RF receiver Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
M Oxygen enriched environment applicability - Operating table used in general surgeries in hospital IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
E CB scheme applicability for battery powered medical devices CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
I IATF 16949 - 8.4.2.3 - Applicability to Shipping Suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
S CQI-12 - Applicability to Raw Materials Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
C Applicability of ISO 9001:2015 Section 8.5 - Engineering company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
H Applicability of EN 13795 for Incise Drape EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S Applicability of the standard IEC 60601-2-18 to an arthroscopy pump IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
Q Partial non applicability of ISO 9001 Cl. 7.1.5 (not having services)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M User Interface of Unknown Provenance (UOUP) applicability IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 7
E Applicability of Low Voltage Directive (LVD) for 12V equipment CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
Y Counterfeit Parts - AS9100 D Cl. 8.1.4 - Can I claim no applicability? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
M IEC 62304 Applicability - GUI Control Software IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
D Clarification of Applicability of TS 16949 Requirements to a Non-Automotive Business IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
Richard Regalado Sharing a Statement of Applicability (SOA) for ISO/IEC 27001:2013 IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
G Not quite old news: Statement of Applicability IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
G Question on Statement of Applicability (SOA) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
L TS 16949 applicability for Supplier's Supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
R ISO 22000:2005 Clause 7.10.4 Withdrawal - Applicability and documentation required? Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 3
A Applicability of electrical safety standards to a dedicated PC IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
A Help me understand the applicability of 21 CFR Part 820.198 (Customer Complaints) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
Y New Draft FDA Guidance for Applicability of GLP in Medical Device Submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
G TS 16949 applicability for Bulk Material Product IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 25
Q Two AS9102 Applicability and Interpretation Questions AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
R HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) applicability Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
E Applicability of Defibrillator Energy Test to Implantable Devices IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
S OEM Supplier of Accessories Registration and 21 CFR 820 QSR Controls Applicability 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
P 7.1, 7.3 and APQP Requirements Applicability in Transfer Case IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
A EN 60601-2-51 applicability to an ECG Event Recorder IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom