I still am missing the difference between the two...
if the input/output are approved how is this achieved ...demonstrate something is true... ox dictionary, to do this you would need to review and "verify" that the evidence shows this
if the design is verified... you are required to examine evidence that demonstrates requirements have been met
I am failing to see the difference, I agree that approval is not mysterious and in my mind I have a definition, but why are the two called for when they are both the same?
My opinion is that approval relates to budgetary, resource requirements in addition to having the confidence that verification has proved it technically sound e.g. when moving through the different phases of design you might not have the finance or resource to support the next phase.
In this case I would see approval more of an internal business requirement and the verification for regs...
Is this how an FDA inspector would see it? if not where is there definition for approval
if the input/output are approved how is this achieved ...demonstrate something is true... ox dictionary, to do this you would need to review and "verify" that the evidence shows this
if the design is verified... you are required to examine evidence that demonstrates requirements have been met
I am failing to see the difference, I agree that approval is not mysterious and in my mind I have a definition, but why are the two called for when they are both the same?
My opinion is that approval relates to budgetary, resource requirements in addition to having the confidence that verification has proved it technically sound e.g. when moving through the different phases of design you might not have the finance or resource to support the next phase.
In this case I would see approval more of an internal business requirement and the verification for regs...
Is this how an FDA inspector would see it? if not where is there definition for approval