Approval of Documents - Is Verbal Approval good enough?

F

FrameReader

#1
I'm in the process of writing up our Control of Documents procedure, and I'm puzzling over how detailed we need to be when it comes to approving our documents 4.2.3(a).

We're not a huge company (~50 employees), with four departments.

When a document needs to be updated/changed/created, the manager of a department, with input from his/her subordinates, will come up with a version of what they want the document to look like. The manager then communicates this information to the QMS guy (me). I formalize the change (basically meaning I type it into the computer), and then when I'm done, I show it to the manager (this could be done as an e-mail attachment or by presenting him/her with a printed hard copy of the document - we haven't formalized this part and don't intend to), and then the manager tells me verbally that it looks good (ie that I have made the understood the changes he/she wanted me to make and that I made the changes accordingly - in other words, I think it can be said that they approve of the change - verbally). Once I have this verbal approval, I proceed with the rest of the 'Control of Documents' procedure (archiving the old version of the document, placing the new version in a network share accessible to the employees, updating a document that shows the revision history (including a comment about who approved the current version of the document), etc.

So I guess my question is, is this sufficient (especially the verbal approval part)? I mean, there's no real 'record' that the verbal approval actually occured. All I do is make a note of who approved the change in an excel spreadsheet that lists all of our documents.

Do we need to incorporate some kind of electronic/digital signature document approval procedure as part of our Control of Documents procedure? I'd rather not get into that if I don't have to.

Thanks in advance for your replies, Elsmar Cove community!

FrameReader
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Re: Approval of Documents

I'm in the process of writing up our Control of Documents procedure, and I'm puzzling over how detailed we need to be when it comes to approving our documents 4.2.3(a).

We're not a huge company (~50 employees), with four departments.

When a document needs to be updated/changed/created, the manager of a department, with input from his/her subordinates, will come up with a version of what they want the document to look like. The manager then communicates this information to the QMS guy (me). I formalize the change (basically meaning I type it into the computer), and then when I'm done, I show it to the manager (this could be done as an e-mail attachment or by presenting him/her with a printed hard copy of the document - we haven't formalized this part and don't intend to), and then the manager tells me verbally that it looks good (ie that I have made the understood the changes he/she wanted me to make and that I made the changes accordingly - in other words, I think it can be said that they approve of the change - verbally). Once I have this verbal approval, I proceed with the rest of the 'Control of Documents' procedure (archiving the old version of the document, placing the new version in a network share accessible to the employees, updating a document that shows the revision history (including a comment about who approved the current version of the document), etc.

So I guess my question is, is this sufficient (especially the verbal approval part)? I mean, there's no real 'record' that the verbal approval actually occured. All I do is make a note of who approved the change in an excel spreadsheet that lists all of our documents.

Do we need to incorporate some kind of electronic/digital signature document approval procedure as part of our Control of Documents procedure? I'd rather not get into that if I don't have to.

Thanks in advance for your replies, Elsmar Cove community!

FrameReader
Hi FrameReader.

IMO you need some record of the approval in order to comply with 4.2.3 a. If it's just a verbal OK there is no objective evidence that the document has been reviewed for adequacy, right?

I have the process owner sign something - whether it's the document itself or a document approval sheet.

Actually I prefer an approval sheet or change record becuase then you don't need to keep a paper copy of the documents itself if you want to keep your procedures on the intranet or something.
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
Re: Approval of Documents

Document what you do. The fact that you keep a spreadsheet is your record of who. Make sure that your procedure spells out the fact that the dept. managers are responsible for approving document to the MR and and the MR records the who and when in a spreadsheet. If you protect that spreadsheet you will have even tighter control, proving that the janitor cannot open the file and change the approval information accidently or on purpose.
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Re: Approval of Documents

Document what you do. The fact that you keep a spreadsheet is your record of who. Make sure that your procedure spells out the fact that the dept. managers are responsible for approving document to the MR and and the MR records the who and when in a spreadsheet. If you protect that spreadsheet you will have even tighter control, proving that the janitor cannot open the file and change the approval information accidently or on purpose.
I dunno - there's still no evidence that the document was actually reviewed... it's one person's word.
But I'm looking at this through FDA goggles too.
Our customers would write this up every time even if the registrar didn't.
 

sagai

Quite Involved in Discussions
#5
Re: Approval of Documents

in 9001 word, an email is fine if it does readily available, but you shall mention your approach in your document management procedure description, remember about tha past talking is not an objective evidence br
Sz.
 
#6
Imho it may be a little dangerous not to have written records of everything that is going on. Auditors love to tell you things like "if it isn't recorded, than it doesn't exist".
Cheers,
 
Q

Quality-Geek

#7
As long as your process is documented and you can control your spreadsheet tightly, you're probably OK. Personally, I like having an actual signature. I've seen too many cases of "amnesia." I really don't like it when some flipping promoted-to-his-highest-level-of-incompetence-idiot "forgets" that he made a change and tries to get me in trouble. Getting a signature keeps me out of trouble, since I'm one of two people who can change any document in the plant.

And we're old-school... I haven't been able to talk management into buying Acrobat for everyone yet, so everything is printed and then scanned. I couldn't even scan effectively until a couple years ago! Right now digital sigs are not happening.

Scott, I like your approval sheet approach. It would save a ton of paper (and comply with ISO 14000 objectives and targets).
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
My response has nothing to do with any standard requirement. In an very broader sense whoever approves, does that person stand by it ?
Even if it is the CEO who approves with a signoff, is he humble enough to admit an error if there is one ?
Even if he approves verbally, will he stand by it and admit an error if there is any ?
OR
Is he the one who will turn around when something goes wrong and says 'Who approved this s---' ?
If ethics run in the blood of your company then ...
All I do is make a note of who approved the change in an excel spreadsheet that lists all of our documents.
is ok ~~~
 
Last edited:

harry

Super Moderator
#9
My response has nothing to do with any standard requirement. In an very broader sense whoever approves, does that person stand by it ?
Even if it is the CEO who approves with a signoff, is he humble enough to admit an error if there is one ?
Even if he approves verbally, will he stand by it and admit an error if there is any ?
OR
Is he the one who will turn around when something goes wrong and says 'Who approved this s---' ?
If ethics run in the blood of your company then ...
is ok ~~~
Good point - Accountability!!
 
J
#10
I'm in the process of writing up our Control of Documents procedure, and I'm puzzling over how detailed we need to be when it comes to approving our documents 4.2.3(a).

We're not a huge company (~50 employees), with four departments.

When a document needs to be updated/changed/created, the manager of a department, with input from his/her subordinates, will come up with a version of what they want the document to look like. The manager then communicates this information to the QMS guy (me). I formalize the change (basically meaning I type it into the computer), and then when I'm done, I show it to the manager (this could be done as an e-mail attachment or by presenting him/her with a printed hard copy of the document - we haven't formalized this part and don't intend to), and then the manager tells me verbally that it looks good (ie that I have made the understood the changes he/she wanted me to make and that I made the changes accordingly - in other words, I think it can be said that they approve of the change - verbally). Once I have this verbal approval, I proceed with the rest of the 'Control of Documents' procedure (archiving the old version of the document, placing the new version in a network share accessible to the employees, updating a document that shows the revision history (including a comment about who approved the current version of the document), etc.

So I guess my question is, is this sufficient (especially the verbal approval part)? I mean, there's no real 'record' that the verbal approval actually occured. All I do is make a note of who approved the change in an excel spreadsheet that lists all of our documents.

Do we need to incorporate some kind of electronic/digital signature document approval procedure as part of our Control of Documents procedure? I'd rather not get into that if I don't have to.

Thanks in advance for your replies, Elsmar Cove community!

FrameReader
I do not see a particular problem with your method on the surface of it. In fact I used just such an informal process in the system I set up. It was my initials on the documents most of the time...

As an auditor, I would be interested in knowing how you control and protect your documents, who can access and change the originals, who releases them etc. If the system is sufficiently controlled and I find no bad resvisons on the floor etc... then I don't think I'd have a problem with a "verbal" change between yourself and the manager/dept head.
As to the idea of someone not standing behind what they approved...If something like that were to come up during an audit, it would demonstrate that procedures were not being read and followed more than not being properly approved.
After all, if you follow your procedure, and get a verbal OK (but in reality there is something amiss), someone else should certainly catch the error when the new procedure is put into effect and they try to follow it.
An auditor should never even be aware os such an occurance.
And I've never had one go around asking, "did you approve this?"

Peace
James
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Joint approval between OEM and Manufacturer on Design Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
I Document levels and approval requirements for lower level documents like work instructions, forms etc. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 18
C Document Management Solution for Routing Documents for Approval Manually Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 18
J Requirements for Review and Approval of QMS Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
T Document Approval Process for Company Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 20
B Requirement for Review and Re-Approval of Documents - ISO 9001 Clause 4.2.3 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
S How to show Approval for Documents and Training? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
J Approval of Grandfathered Documents - ISO 9000:2000 Clauses 4.2.3 a&b Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
F Who should Sign Supplier PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) documents? APQP and PPAP 13
S Document Approval Matrix - What manager needs to sign what documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
C Control of Documents - Our approval process is kinda long Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
W Approval of Electronic Documents - How do we indicate "document approval"? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
A Document Review and Document Approval --- 2 Signatures needed acc. §820.40? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
A Customer Approval (Medical Devices) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
D Low risk IVD study in the UK, do I need MHRA approval? UK Medical Device Regulations 1
B NIOSH Approval for Surgical N95 Respirators - Required testing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
B Document Approval Matrix Benchmarking Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
J Document Approval Signature Order Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
D Change Approval Requirements - Does every change need formal customer approval? Design and Development of Products and Processes 17
B SN95 Respirator Approval Information Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
P Notified Body Approval of Change EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Marcel DS GOST-R (Type approval for Vehicles in Russia) Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
O Radio modular approval in Brazil Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
O Radio Modular approval in China China Medical Device Regulations 0
dgrainger Clue to UK's new regulatory requirements - approval of all devices placed on the market? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
was named killer AS9100 Supplier Approval Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
F How to fill out an Appearance Approval Report (AAR) APQP and PPAP 0
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Production approval testing - Alternative ideas for Validation Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
JoCam Difference between Approval and Registration - ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
I Can a document (form) approval record be separate? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
F Medical Devices - Hong Kong - Post approval changes regulation (China's MOH) Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
F Medical Devices-South Africa _Post approval changes and Software Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
C NB approval - Basic question about Notified Bodies and their role EU Medical Device Regulations 10
C AS9145 Appendix D PPAP Approval Form APQP and PPAP 2
N China - Start manufacturing before change approval? China Medical Device Regulations 3
I MSA requirement for 5 Micrometers + CP changes need customer approval? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D ROW Approval Matrix Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
T Clinical trial - Medical device product not cleared (without FDA approval) in a drug trial Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
S Education authority requires approval of all courses - Training services provider ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Can Brazil approval be used for other countries in Latin America? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
M Does cFDA accepts FDA approval or CE marking? China Medical Device Regulations 1
S NADCAP approval for Conventional Machining and Chemical processes - need assistance AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
DuncanGibbons FAA approval of articles (PMA, TSO) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
M Criteria and when to carry out Setup Approval Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
D Engineering Drawing Review and Approval Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
K ISO 9001 Requirements for Raw Material Supplier Assessment and Approval ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
T AS9100 Maintain Approval When Business Ownership Changes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
M Informational USFDA Guidance – Acceptance and Filing Reviews for Premarket Approval Applications (PMAs) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom