M
Wow, getting bunch of help. it's great!
Hi Bev,
it seems unfair to the supplier (but I am preaching for my own church, I am actually the supplier!!) but i have nothing to this day to justify not accepting this type of reject if I follow the rule AQL=%.
It seesm that lately because of the economy probably, my customers follow the following road: they cull everything they find during production that is a defetc and then reject the lot to get $$ back. so if they accrued 402 defects over 10,000, I do not know any tools that would tell me today that this is acceptable.
I am just trying to understand what is to be expected.
your RQL - Rejectable Quality Level - system seems interesting. Is this something that could be accepted by a customer that follows AQLs/MIL STD in general or is it more an agreement outside normal procedures?
I tried to find the thread with the key words "RQL - Rejectable Quality Level - system " and could not locate it. would you remember the title by any chance?
thanks again!!
Hi Bev,
it seems unfair to the supplier (but I am preaching for my own church, I am actually the supplier!!) but i have nothing to this day to justify not accepting this type of reject if I follow the rule AQL=%.
It seesm that lately because of the economy probably, my customers follow the following road: they cull everything they find during production that is a defetc and then reject the lot to get $$ back. so if they accrued 402 defects over 10,000, I do not know any tools that would tell me today that this is acceptable.
I am just trying to understand what is to be expected.
your RQL - Rejectable Quality Level - system seems interesting. Is this something that could be accepted by a customer that follows AQLs/MIL STD in general or is it more an agreement outside normal procedures?
I tried to find the thread with the key words "RQL - Rejectable Quality Level - system " and could not locate it. would you remember the title by any chance?
thanks again!!

Last edited by a moderator: