Are the TC 176 Documents on Risk Based Thinking useful to you?

Are the ISO TC176 RBT documents useful in explaining the concept of risk?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • No

    Votes: 14 82.4%
  • I don't have a formed opinion

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#1
The ISO TC 176 develops not only standards, but supporting documents to assist organizations and individuals in understanding the contents of the standards, in terms of implementation and assessing conformance.

With the demise of the requirements for "preventive action" in the 2015 version of ISO 9001, the TC 176 SC2 decided to introduce the concept of Risk Based Thinking (RBT) in the standard. Not surprisingly, controversy ensued. Not necessarily about the concept of risk management, but HOW to make it easily understood, of pragmatic implementation and the facilitation of effective and consistent assessment by (internal and external) auditors.

Realizing that the CD and DIS have been subjected to sharp criticism around the RBT requirements, the TC 176 SC 2 has already released two documents to assist with a better understanding of the subject:

A presentation on ISO 9001 and Risk Based Thinking (here)

A paper on ISO 9001 and Risk (here)

I believe that the documents fall way short of providing practical, actionable and useful guidance for quality management system professionals to clearly understand what is needed to comply with ISO 9001:2015 in terms of RBT. Ditto for auditors.

At the risk of repeating the "process approach" fiasco since it's introduction in the 3rd Edition of ISO 9001, we might end up many diverging ideas of what RBT is. Failure to accomplish an universal comprehension of what RBT is, represents a failure of the standardization process. Standards, by design, MUST allow for effective implementation and conformity assessment practices. If Standards don't promote a COMMON UNDERSTANDING of a subject, it has failed it's mission.

So, I would like to poll Covers from all quadrants and ask if they believe that the documents developed, so far, to assist with an understanding of RBT have succeeded? Especially the paper on ISO 9001 and Risk, with the example of a road crossing. Can you extrapolate from that paper/example to your Quality System? Was the paper useful? Why did the TC cross the road? ;)
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Colin

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
I agree with the sentiments regarding the road crossing analogy - it is cringe worthy.

The presentation is a little better but they both seem to concentrate more on risk rather than opportunity - yet the 2 are being pushed forwards together.

I must say that I got more from a video with Nigel Croft but I can't seem to find the link at the moment.
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
DIS 9001 did not specify enough for even the most experienced auditor to audit risk-based thinking (RBT) beyond the auditee knowing what their risks and opportunities are.

RBT may not result in any evidence or action by the auditee.

The FDIS should require the auditee to establish its own criteria for determining the significance of risks and opportunities related to its stakeholders and their needs for quality outcomes, products, processes and system.

Then users of the standard can focus on the processes and controls necessary to manage significant risks and opportunities.

Making up for a weak specification with guidance is not the solution.

John
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#5
Thanks for starting the poll, Sidney. I voted 'No'.

I start from the position of not understanding what message we are trying to convey with the phrase 'Risk based thinking'. In kicking the 3 words around in my head for longer than a minute I find questions emerge and, if that is the case, then RBT doesn't cut it as a principle in the same way as, say, 'Process Approach' does.

Now I accept that there is a lot more work to be done with Process Approach and I hope that WG 24 will give it further thought as well as revisiting RBT.

I'm not sure how auditors will take to RBT and what that will mean for assessments. I feel happy that my thinking (RB or not RB :D) about what quality is and how a management system should be aligned to: deliver quality; satisy customers; maximize opportunities; and manage risks remains largely unchanged.

I'll point some people to this thread if we can come up with some sensible guidance as to what RBT is and how to explain it. Or even if we recommend losing the term and deleting the guidance.:notme:
 

Peter Fraser

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Sidney

It is bound to fail since it is trying to justify a flawed concept - why on earth attempt to redefine "risk" as potentially positive, when even the rest of 9001 talks of "... and opportunities"? The example makes no sense to me.

The line "The concept of “opportunity” in the context of ISO 9001 relates to exceeding expectations and going beyond stated objectives" makes no sense to me either. An opportunity can be to be achieve an objective more efficiently or effectively, neither of which need impact on customer satisfaction.

And... the implication that preventive action is a "single component of a quality management system" implies a lack of understanding of "preventive action" - every time you accept an order, or allocate a project manager, you should be trying to prevent things from going wrong.

0 out of 10.
 

insect warfare

QA=Question Authority
Trusted Information Resource
#7
I wonder if the next edition of ISO 9004 will be utilized to effectively cover the subject of RBT, and (more particularly) when it will be revised. So far, there seems to be no indication on ISO's website that a revision of ISO 9004 is just around the corner.

Does anyone here know what is in store for ISO 9004 during the ISO 9001:2015 transition period?

Brian :rolleyes:
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#8
Does anyone here know what is in store for ISO 9004 during the ISO 9001:2015 transition period?
ISO 9004:2009 underwent a review process and was reaffirmed on 2014-06-18. It won't probably be revised for another 4-5 years. After the release of ISO 9001:2015, all the attention will go to the ISO/TS 9002 and hopefully that won't be botched too badly.
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
I voted for the No ~~~
RBT aka prospects and consequences of every work, process and the system at large must be viewed keeping customer requirements and product quality in mind at all times. A great deal of considerations must be given to resource and infrastructure that is available on hand and considering the competence of the people involved. In particular I stress the competence because, even though people come under available resource, their measure gets hardly considered in effectiveness terms. At every such place where the consequences weigh large, they have to be brought up with potential loss estimation to the company and must be later compensated by necessary resource to showcase how such investment will directly impact on bringing down the loss estimation. The TC 176 document falls short of bringing this core risk assessment thinking into limelight. It could have done well with several better examples, under several real life scenario.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Sidney Vianna All the TC 176 documents - ISO 10020 - Customer Satisfaction Monitoring and Measuring ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
Sidney Vianna The ISO 9000 family - Status of all the documents administered by ISO TC 176 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Sidney Vianna What ISO Standard (under the TC 176) supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal #10? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 11
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News Tirelessly Improving the Brand Integrity of ISO 9001 - Working Group under ISO TC 176 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 42
B Discussion on TC 176 and ISO 9001:2015 8.7.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
R Does anyone know why the TC 176 website has been hijacked by CSA? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 1
D Examples of Process Audit - Not just ISO/TC 176/SC 2/N544R3! Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 2
H TC 176 Website - Request for an Interpretation Feature ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Sidney Vianna Should the TC 176 Re-word the Requirements for Preventive Action? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 60
ScottK ISO/TC 176 Interpretation reference RFI-011 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
I Need link to PDF file ISO TC/176/SC2 Home Page ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
W Interpretation of ISO 9001 clauses issued by TC 176 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S ISO/TC 176 SC2 is now reviewing some minor changes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Sidney Vianna Advice from ISO/TC 176 for Sector specific standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
Sidney Vianna ISO TC's 176 & 207 & other Stakeholders Joint Vision ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
V General Info on ISO 9000 and Technical Committee 176 - Getting Involved ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
D ISO 9001:2000 TAG Committee - TC 176 is responsible for ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
JodiB Article: ISO 9001 Management Systems - Info gathered by ISO/TC 176 Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 4
K ISO / TS 16949 Draft "Disapproved"? December 2001 US TAG ISO/TC 176 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
Marc TC 176/SC 2 Communique ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
M Retention period of documents and records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
D Offsite storage of QMS documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
K Joint approval between OEM and Manufacturer on Design Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
was named killer AS 9100D - Calibration Instructions - Controlled documents? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
N Audit non-compliance API Q1 - Use of External Documents 4.4.4 in Product Realization Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 5
C Corrective action for failure in documents control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
A QMS Overhaul - Reorganizing and Renaming Documents - Internal References Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 18
J Controlled information versus defined documents / records ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D DQ documents of new equipment - Function specification Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
N Device Labeling - Medtronic Ventilator Files (Risk Management documents) Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
qualprod To set frequency to review documents in ISO 9001 7.5? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
S Mandatory documents vs shall "something" but without mandatory documents ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
I Reissuing documents due to missing version / issue numbers Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
I Dating controlled documents after changes - Revision History Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
M Advertising medical devices in the U.S - Advertising regulations or guidance documents Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
R Process control documents - Context of API Spec Q1, Clause 5.7.1.3 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
C Identifying and Controlling External Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
E Part 11 Compliance, Excel living documents (i.e. document master list, equipment list, approved supplier list) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
M EU MDR - Annex II 3b - What documents fall under this requirement? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
H New 510K VS Documents about design change. Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational EU – Manufacturer incident report (MIR) for serious incident- template 2020 (Directives and new regulations) version 7.2 and related documents Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Informational EU – Some documents related to Call for expression of interest for expert panels on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
R Implementing Design History Documents/ Technical Documents in the QMS ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Approvals on QMS Documents - ISO 13485 Requirements Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
K Mandatory Documents for EU authorized Representative under MDR CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Hello IAF. Are you listening? Please explain the inconsistency in your IAF Mandatory Documents (2019) ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 6
I QMS documents required at each stage of Software development IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom