S
hi cove
agreed totaly with you stiljoor
in that time, the issue was clearly one NC which require one CA, but his clarification was that issue need CA but also to put as PA would be good in order to avoid it in the future.
i was astonished but he reply with confident that this is very common to attribut a C&PA to one unique issue.
he looks as he wasn't confident that the solution that he gave to the NC would give corrective and permanent action, aren't you agree with me ?
did ever one of you got this fact? i mean , to find out one NC, which not depending of everything that we can control and in these case even you correct it, you expect to notify it again. ? sorry for my special english
agreed totaly with you stiljoor
in that time, the issue was clearly one NC which require one CA, but his clarification was that issue need CA but also to put as PA would be good in order to avoid it in the future.
i was astonished but he reply with confident that this is very common to attribut a C&PA to one unique issue.
he looks as he wasn't confident that the solution that he gave to the NC would give corrective and permanent action, aren't you agree with me ?
did ever one of you got this fact? i mean , to find out one NC, which not depending of everything that we can control and in these case even you correct it, you expect to notify it again. ? sorry for my special english


