Area for Improvement or Non conformance

E

EEJen

#1
I was looking for input on how others handle this finding. Audit Scope - Receiving Process

The receiving process is defined. There are four different processes for receiving 1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product

Process 1 & 4 are documented. Process 2 & 3 are not documented.

I have not found evidence that the processes are ineffective.

I plan to write this up for Area for Improvement.

If you think it is a non conformance, what is the requirement because there is not an internal requirement in the company and ISO 9001:2008 does not require all processes to be documented.

Have a great day.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#2
I was looking for input on how others handle this finding. Audit Scope - Receiving Process

The receiving process is defined. There are four different processes for receiving 1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product
I understand from this, you have a documented procedure. Correct me if I am wrong.

Process 1 & 4 are documented. Process 2 & 3 are not documented.

I have not found evidence that the processes are ineffective.

I plan to write this up for Area for Improvement.

If you think it is a non conformance, what is the requirement because there is not an internal requirement in the company and ISO 9001:2008 does not require all processes to be documented.

Have a great day.
May I understand exactly what do you mean by *not documented* ?
You mean, there is no Receipt Note, Quality Inspection & some other that you follow for 1&4 ?
 
E

EEJen

#3
The documented procedure includes 1 & 4 but it does not include 2 & 3.

Required records for 2 & 3 are kept but are different from 1 & 4.

For example, raw materials go directly to the floor and inspected by qualified personnel on the floor.

Would the non conformance be that these process do not comply with the documented receiving procedure? I might have answered my own question for the non conformance. This is an internal audit. Want to encourage documenting the other processes vs trying to fit the other processes into the documented process.

Sometimes it takes writing it out to have the ah ha moment. You know it just not quite right but can not pin point the requirement.
 

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#4
The documented procedure includes 1 & 4 but it does not include 2 & 3.

Required records for 2 & 3 are kept but are different from 1 & 4.

For example, raw materials go directly to the floor and inspected by qualified personnel on the floor.

Would the non conformance be that these process do not comply with the documented receiving procedure? I might have answered my own question for the non conformance. This is an internal audit. Want to encourage documenting the other processes vs trying to fit the other processes into the documented process.

Sometimes it takes writing it out to have the ah ha moment. You know it just not quite right but can not pin point the requirement.
It would not be a bad idea to have a complete documented procedure, especially in this case where you have four different methods of dealings. I would prefer referring to 4.1c.

c) determine criteria and methods needed to ensure that both the operation and control of these processes are effective

,​


 
C

ChrissieO

#5
I was looking for input on how others handle this finding. Audit Scope - Receiving Process

The receiving process is defined. There are four different processes for receiving 1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product

Process 1 & 4 are documented. Process 2 & 3 are not documented.

I have not found evidence that the processes are ineffective.

I plan to write this up for Area for Improvement.

If you think it is a non conformance, what is the requirement because there is not an internal requirement in the company and ISO 9001:2008 does not require all processes to be documented.

Have a great day.
I would not class this as a non conformance as this is not a required procedure but if you feel a procedure would be of use raise it as an improvement but don't have procedures just for the sake of it.

As you said you have found the process to be efficient but there needs to be a contingency plan in place i.e. if the team that conducted this procedure where to win a lottery syndicate and walk out tomorrow, would the process be able to be carried out effectiely.

Chrssie
 
T

tomvehoski

#6
Who cares if it is a NC or OFI? If the company would be better off by documenting 2 & 3, then document them. If not (or there are bigger fires to fight), don't bother. If they would be better off not having 1 & 4 documented, get rid of the document all together.
 
#7
I was looking for input on how others handle this finding. Audit Scope - Receiving Process

The receiving process is defined. There are four different processes for receiving 1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product

Process 1 & 4 are documented. Process 2 & 3 are not documented.

I have not found evidence that the processes are ineffective.

I plan to write this up for Area for Improvement.

If you think it is a non conformance, what is the requirement because there is not an internal requirement in the company and ISO 9001:2008 does not require all processes to be documented.

Have a great day.
Why does it need to be improved? If the undocumented process is performed often, is well understood, can be shown to be effective and the 'players' all give you a similar 'story' what's the point? What are you trying to improve?

Often, well understood processes don't need writing down. Brushing your teeth, driving your car etc. Less well understood/infrequently done processes - filling in the tax return - may need some description.
 
#8
Who cares if it is a NC or OFI? If the company would be better off by documenting 2 & 3, then document them. If not (or there are bigger fires to fight), don't bother. If they would be better off not having 1 & 4 documented, get rid of the document all together.
"Better off" is a very subjective conclusion for any auditor to draw! It's not for auditors to decide this, but to evaluate if the process works and to report to management. Since this isn't a non-conformity with ISO 9001, the auditor shouldn't go around saying 'get rid of it'...
 

Pancho

wikineer
Super Moderator
#9
Why does it need to be improved? If the undocumented process is performed often, is well understood, can be shown to be effective and the 'players' all give you a similar 'story' what's the point? What are you trying to improve?
Not speaking for the OP, but from our own similar cases. I see at least three reasons why we would want to document such processes.

1)
Training. It is much easier to teach new personnel about how something is done from explicit instructions than from tacit ones.

2)
Contingency. If the receiving super missed the bus (or got hit by it) who's going to know how to sort incoming goods?

3)
Improvement beyond the present "satisfactory" way of doing things. Once a process is documented, imperfections and opportunities become evident. Maybe an inspection can be done earlier to avoid costly handling, maybe the documentation is always chased at the last minute, etc. These things are not obvious unless the process is documented.


--
Finally, a material receiving procedure that reads something like the following would likely rise a PAR in our system, just because the opportunity for improvement is too obvious.

"There are four different processes for receiving (1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product.

For (1) follow [Std purch prod procedure], for (4) follow [Returns procedure]. For (2) and (3) ask Joe. He knows."
 
#10
Not speaking for the OP, but from our own similar cases. I see at least three reasons why we would want to document such processes.

1)
Training. It is much easier to teach new personnel about how something is done from explicit instructions than from tacit ones.

2)
Contingency. If the receiving super missed the bus (or got hit by it) who's going to know how to sort incoming goods?

3)
Improvement beyond the present "satisfactory" way of doing things. Once a process is documented, imperfections and opportunities become evident. Maybe an inspection can be done earlier to avoid costly handling, maybe the documentation is always chased at the last minute, etc. These things are not obvious unless the process is documented.


--
Finally, a material receiving procedure that reads something like the following would likely rise a PAR in our system, just because the opportunity for improvement is too obvious.

"There are four different processes for receiving (1) Standard purchased product for assembly going to warehouse (2) Material sent out to a supplier for processing (3) Raw material going to the production floor (4) Returned product.

For (1) follow [Std purch prod procedure], for (4) follow [Returns procedure]. For (2) and (3) ask Joe. He knows."
Pancho:

1) - Training comes from experience of doing the task. Past cultures (like the Vikings) couldn't write, but they were pretty effective! What if the person can't read? We also need to consider this "Tell me, and I will forget.
Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand". Confucius, 450 B.C. There may be no need to train 'new people' it depends on turnover etc. We've not been told this is the case.

2) - Often, we learn from other people who do the same work. If the supervisor gets hit by a bus, this is a low risk. Why write it down for that type of contingency? If there's another person who did the work, ask them!

3) - I'd suggest that improvement should come from performance (C2C or C2B) indicators first. Writing a process (flow chart) down doesn't always (indeed, rarely) reveals any performance issues. As part of a 'discovery' process, doing a spaghetti diagram, will...but you don't see many of those in 'ISO' documentation!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T OFI (Opportunity for Improvement) vs. AOC (Area of Concern) - Definitions Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
D Any recommendations on where to find experienced quality hires in Chicago area? Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 3
L PMA and Non-PMA parts in same finished goods area? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
N Is there a standard / rules pertaining to eating in medical device manufacturing area? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
C IATF 16949:2016 Section 8.5.1.2 item d) accessible for use at the designated work area(s) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
K Calibration of Dose Area Product (DAP) Meter in our Class IIb X-Ray Medical Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
R PolyWorks Scanner and Software Training (Lansing, MI area) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
J Functional group / area responsible on a Control Plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R Defect Display Area for Employee Shift Change Information Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
E Audit Focus Area: Tribal Knowledge Internal Auditing 10
T IATF Certified Auditor/Consultant Wanted in the Evansville, Indiana Area Consultants and Consulting 0
T Training Verification by Area Supervisors Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
E Pallets need to be changed when raw materials are transferring from WH to MFG area? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 6
P Work Area (Production Shop Floor) Training Matrix Requirements Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
M How to calculate Cg and Cgk for a 2-Dimensional Area Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
D PPE Requirements in Manufacturing Area of Class IIa Medical Device Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
R Floor Marking Colors - Clearance Area in front of Electrical Panels Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
J What is the gowning requirements for the Pharmaceutical Packaging area ? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 7
I International Sales Legal/Regulatory Gray Area? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
J Non Conformance Area Policies Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 8
N NC Area Over-Flowing! What Can I Do With The Rejected Product? Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
P How to clean paint area tile faster and improve OEE Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
R Definition KRA - (Key Result Area) - Definition Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
R KRA's (Key Result Area) for a QA Manager Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 8
Q I was assigned as Kaizen Leader for our MRB Area - Your advice appreciated Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
E Lead Auditor Training in the San Francisco Bay Area Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
N Auditing a Specific Activity or Area of an Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M California Proposition 65 Compliant (no more than 600 ppm touch area) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
C Key Performance Metrics related to Process Area Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
M Internal Auditing of Area with Active Change Control Internal Auditing 14
G Preparation Work for Internal Audit before they Audit a Area Internal Auditing 2
M Attribute Gage MSA - What is the width of the gray area of ​​doubt? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
J Equipment for Cleaning various materials over a Wide Area Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
A "GMP Area" - FDA definition Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
R GM's Shift Change Over C.A.R.E Area Information Wanted APQP and PPAP 1
B ISTA Test Labs in the US, preferrably in the NY Metro area Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
B Environmental Legal Compliance Audit - Auditor from Michigan area Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 4
R While Measuring Filter Face, Why We Count From Dead Area? HEPA Filter Related Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
Q Best tools to use to determine the best layout of a given area (Office) Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 9
D Surface Finish Inspection Company (Laboratory) (Detroit area) needed Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
J ISO 9001 Internal Auditor Training in New York area Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
S NADCAP and CCA (Particle Counting) in a Controlled Contamination Area - Standards AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
somashekar Supply Chain Oversight is the FDA's Next Area of Concern Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
D Non-Conforming Holding Area Methods and Size Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
D Any MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) classes in the Chicago area? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
P APQP Training Classes in the Los Angeles, California area Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
C Balanced Scorecard and KRA (key result area) Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 5
S How to calculate the 'planted' area in any given stretch of land? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 14
D A survey on salary in the QA field around your area. Career and Occupation Discussions 11
S Auditing Approach - Staff auditing their own area Internal Auditing 12

Similar threads

Top Bottom