Article 12 Combination Device Registration With Competent Authority

B

Bigdubz61

#1
Can anyone assist with this please. Article 12 states (to the effect of) that when 2 CE marked devices are being packaged together for conjoined use, they do not bear another CE mark on the pack labelling, and that a statement is available that the devices work as intended together. At a recent NB audit, I was advised that items pertaining to Article 12 of the MDD should be registered with the Competent Authority (MHRA). Does anyone have experience of this and how is it done? Thanks in advance.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
It's similar to how class 1 devices are handled. Contact your Authorised Representative.

Other than that, the details are in Article 12:

Article 12

Particular procedure for systems and procedure packs

1. By way of derogation from Article 11 this Article shall apply to systems and procedure packs.

2. Any natural or legal person who puts devices bearing the CE marking together within their intended purpose and within the limits of use specified by their manufacturers, in order to place them on the market as a system or procedure pack, shall draw up a declaration by which he states that:

(a) he has verified the mutual compatibility of the devices in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions and has carried out his operations in accordance with these instructions; and

(b) he has packaged the system or procedure pack and supplied relevant information to users incorporating relevant instructions from the manufacturers; and

(c) the whole activity is subjected to appropriate methods of internal control and inspection.

Where the conditions above are not met, as in cases where the system or procedure pack incorporate devices which do not bear a CE marking or where the chosen combination of devices is not compatible in view of their original intended use, the system or procedure pack shall be treated as a device in its own right and as such be subjected to the relevant procedure pursuant to Article 11.

3. Any natural or legal person who sterilized, for the purpose of placing on the market, systems or procedure packs referred to in paragraph 2 or other CE-marked medical devices designed by their manufacturers to be sterilized before use, shall, at his choice, follow one of the procedures referred to in Annex IV, V or VI. The application of the abovementioned Annexes and the intervention of the notified body are limited to the aspects of the procedure relating to the obtaining of sterility. The person shall draw up a declaration stating that sterilization has been carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

4. The products referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 themselves shall not bear an additional CE marking. They shall be accompanied by the information referred to in point 13 of Annex I which includes, where appropriate, the information supplied by the manufacturers of the devices which have been put together. The declaration referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 above shall be kept at the disposal of competent authorities for a period of five years.
By the way, the relevant term is "a system" or "a procedure pack" and not "a combination device" which is considered a combination of a Medical Devices and a Medicinal Product (a medicine etc.) and is handled differently in the regulatory sense.
 
Last edited:
B

Bigdubz61

#3
Thanks for your response Ronen. It was suggested by our Auditor that there was a form on the MHRA website which could be used. I have looked and can't find it. I have written to MHRA but they will respond in about 18 working days.

Article 12 does not say how to do this.

Is a Declaration of Conformity type document adequate?
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
Thanks for your response Ronen. It was suggested by our Auditor that there was a form on the MHRA website which could be used. I have looked and can't find it. I have written to MHRA but they will respond in about 18 working days.

Article 12 does not say how to do this.

Is a Declaration of Conformity type document adequate?
Article 12 prescribes what you need to declare. Formatting is less important. If you'd like that I can prepare such a declaration for you, please send me a PM.

Cheers,
Ronen.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Article 18: Implant Card and information to be communicated. EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R Requirements for MDR Article 22 Systems EU Medical Device Regulations 1
H MDD Article 12 Labeling for Class IIa Medical Device - Please Advise EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Article 22 Procedure Pack Labelling EU Medical Device Regulations 4
N EU MDR - Applicability Article 22 Systems and Procedure Packs CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
M Example of statement for procedure pack MDR Article 22? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 0
S Translational Requirements - Article 120 EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Class I MDR Article 10 – QMS EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Expected lifetime of the device-Article 18 EU Medical Device Regulations 4
R Clinical evaluation without clinical data - MDR Article 61(10) EU Medical Device Regulations 6
A MDR Article 22 applicability - Legal manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 6
T Implant Card - Article 18.1(a) and MDCG 2019-8 clarification EU Medical Device Regulations 3
P Economic operator responsibilities - when the Importer is also Distributor - Article 13 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Medical Device Identification & Codes - Article 27 Requirements questions EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Article 18 in the Implant Card - Expected lifetime of the device EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Article 61 - MDR Clinical Investigation Requirement EU Medical Device Regulations 5
C Article 16 MDR - Medicine packaged together with Medical Device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
F MDR system/procedurepack (article 22) with device acc. to MDD and MDR CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
T Sample of 1st Article Inspection Report wanted APQP and PPAP 3
N EUDAMED postponement and compliance with Article 120 (3) MDR for Legacy Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 8
R MDR Article 22: Systems and procedure packs Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 12
T EU MDR Article 61- Clinical Evaluation EU Medical Device Regulations 2
F 2017/745 Article 31 Single Registration Number Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Interesting article form the UNIDO Magazine - CSR: a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 16
M Informational EU – Guidance document Implant Card relating to the application of Article 18 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council o Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Informational EU – MDCG 2019-7 Guidance on Article 15 of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and in vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) regarding a “person re Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
F Interpretation of MDR 2017/745 Article 23 - CE Mark Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 8
A Interpretation of Article 16 (2b) - Packaging, samples and Certificate EU Medical Device Regulations 10
E MDR Article 117 / Impact to New Marketing Authorization Applications Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
G First Article Submission (Destruction of parts) APQP and PPAP 2
C Access to Technical Documentation - MDR Chapter VI Article 61 EU Medical Device Regulations 4
K First Article Inspection (FAI) - Equipment used - Dimensions vs. Go/No-Go ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M Informational MDCG 2019-3 Interpretation of Article 54(2)b – Pre- market clinical evaluation consultation procedure with the involvement of expert panels Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
T MDR article 22 - System of 2 CE products and validation / usability? EU Medical Device Regulations 10
C Is a First Article Inspection (FAI) Procedure required by ISO 13485? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Informational MDCG 2019-2 Guidance on application of UDI rules to device-part of products referred to in Article 1(8), 1(9) and 1(10) of Regulation 745/2017 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K Article 23 (Parts and components) - Economic Operator EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Marc As the earliest wind farms age - Dec 2018 Ars article Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 4
T Clarification on MDR - Article 18(d) - Implant Card EU Medical Device Regulations 14
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Article from Grant Ramaley in QD - MDSAP: When Is a Certificate Not a Certificate? Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
M FAI AS9102 - What does a First Article Inspection cover? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
C AS9100, Clause 8.5.1.3 - First Article Inspection Costs AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
A MedMMAP Article - August 2018 MedAccred Industry Group Program 0
A MedAccred Program - article MedAccred Industry Group Program 2
U Whether First Article Inspection Report- FAI is mandatory for regular Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 4
C SVHC Lead - Communicate in the supply chain under Article 33 of the REACH Regulation REACH and RoHS Conversations 1
M Is MDR Article 61(5) Unrealistic? EU Medical Device Regulations 9
2 First Article Requirements for Revision Changes of Engineering AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
D Responsible for regulatory compliance (Article 15 of MDR 2017/745) Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
Edward Reesor Canadian News article on impact of MDSAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom