AS9100 - Accountability for Job Travelers

H

HoppyRoo

#1
Hi!

This is something like my 2nd post...

Need a little advice being in the middle of an AS audit.

The auditor noted that on two job travelers on the floor, the quantity of parts didn't match the job / decreased. Ie, Job calls for 35 pieces, OP 1 says 38 pieces made... Or job calls for 2000 pieces, OP 2 says scrap 30 - Qty 1970.

I know why the extra pieces were made, and why they were scrapped. Essentially they were extra pieces made because we will lose 1 or 2 during setup at a later op. On the 30 scrapped, that particular operation is known to have some loss... It's acceptable loss for us.

Either way, he is looking at writing us up as major nonconformance for lack of accountability since the job travelers do not indicate why there is a discrepancy.

Is this fair? Is this what the actual standard is looking for? Our traceability is flawless. Finished product numbers will match up if you follow the whole process. In these cases, the operator simply didn't mark down "why" he scrapped xyz pieces during op whatever.

Should I argue this? And if so... How should I argue this effectively?

Thanks!
Roo
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Roo,

How are the scrapped parts accounted for? Are they put beyond use to avoid release of grey market parts?

You need to show that you have a rock solid way of accounting for all parts.

John
 
H

HoppyRoo

#3
In both of these instances, the parts aren't even close to any kind of finished product. They are simply sorted by type of metal and tossed in clearly marked scrap bins.

Any parts that even remotely look usable would be destroyed prior to scrapping...

So... no... there is no chance these would be "recycled" or make their way onto some other job or anything along those lines...
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
In both of these instances, the parts aren't even close to any kind of finished product. They are simply sorted by type of metal and tossed in clearly marked scrap bins.

Any parts that even remotely look usable would be destroyed prior to scrapping...

So... no... there is no chance these would be "recycled" or make their way onto some other job or anything along those lines...
Roo,

Then, it seems, we both need to understand the nature of the claimed nonconformity.

What is the nature when expressed as the opposite of the AS requirement?

John
 
H

HoppyRoo

#5
That is exactly why I am asking on here... :D I'd like to know what the intent of the standard is for the accountability line.

In this case, our production manager told workers to go ahead and make 38 parts when the job was for 35. This was knowing that we would likely lose a minimum of 1 during a later op for setup.

The auditor is saying that we need to hold him "accountable" for not making the correct number of pieces per the job. And documenting all sorts of justification as to why it was done. Then on top of that, potentially write up some kind of deviation and go back and edit the job to "account" for the expected loss of parts during the process.

While I can understand why information like this could be used for continuous improvement / reduce waste, etc... I don't see what we are currently doing as any kind of major violation of the standard.
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
Too,

I'm confused.

You are now talking about three types of accountability:

  1. Accountability for travelers
  2. Accountability of parts
  3. Accountability of the Production Manager
The auditor is accountable for explaining the exact nature of the claimed nonconformity.

We cannot do that here without all the evidence.

Please ask the auditor to report the exact nature of the nonconformity he sees.

Then you/we can see if it is true.

John
 
H

HoppyRoo

#7
mmm...

The line he is stating we have nonconformance is:

accountability for all product during production ( eg. parts quantities, splitorders,
nonconforming product )

so... part quantity noted by operators does not exactly match stated quantity at top of job. some parts are scrapped off the job without explicit description as to why. example:

Job ABC - Make 35 parts
OP 10 - Machined 38 parts
OP 20 - Blah Blah 38 parts ( scrap 3 )
OP 30 - Blah Blah 35 parts

So he is asking what happened to those 3 parts. And then, who give authorization to make extra pieces than the job calls for etc... etc...

Does that clarify?
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
Roo,

Thanks, our posts crossed.

It seems the applicable requirement 7.5.1g)

...and the "nature" is:

"Failing to account for all product during production".

How does the Production Manager account for all product during production?

John
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
mmm...

The line he is stating we have nonconformance is:

accountability for all product during production ( eg. parts quantities, splitorders,
nonconforming product )

so... part quantity noted by operators does not exactly match stated quantity at top of job. some parts are scrapped off the job without explicit description as to why. example:

Job ABC - Make 35 parts
OP 10 - Machined 38 parts
OP 20 - Blah Blah 38 parts ( scrap 3 )
OP 30 - Blah Blah 35 parts

So he is asking what happened to those 3 parts. And then, who give authorization to make extra pieces than the job calls for etc... etc...

Does that clarify?
Roo,

The three scrapped parts. Did you record the nature of their nonconformities? Are you planning to remove the root causes of the most common types of nonconformity? Also see 8.3 and 8.5.2.

Show evidence that the Production Manager is authorized to over-produce. Also see 5.5.1.

I must say that I agree with the auditor that you have a system nonconformity in need of corrective action and 7.5.1g is a pretty good clause.

John
 
H

HoppyRoo

#10
Correct.

Where we have losses, these are known and currently acceptable for the company. The production manager explained that he typically authorizes making a few extra pieces that will be used for setup. This however isn't explicitly documented on the traveler or noted in job reporting.

So... I know why the auditor is writing this up. But I also can't believe we need to document this to death. In most of these instances we are talking about a few dollars worth of scrap metal when all is said and done. If I have to spend 2 hours writing up nonconformance reports every time we toss 2 pieces used for setup, it just gets way out of hand.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L AS9100 - Product and Service Provision 8.5.1q AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
T Temperature Requirements For In House Calibration - AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
T What does AS9100 mean when it says you must establish a process to do X? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 24
G Tool tracebility and First calibration requirements for aerospace (AS9100) organisation AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
T Internal Nonconformance procedure thoughts (AS9100) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
A AS9100 Training - Where do I start? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
SocalSurfer Can you recommend an enterprise QMS for new AS9100 startup AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
L Open Positions During AS9100 Audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
SocalSurfer AS9100 new certificate, but need QMS software, help Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
C AS9120 or AS9100 Cert pertaining to inventory? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
H AS9100 Checklist for Internal Audit needed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
hockeyhead Existing process never included in AS9100 scope of certification AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
W Major NCRs within AS9100 - What is the most frequent reason for Major NCRs? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Q AS9100:2016 D - Intent of 8.4.3 (K) - Implement QMS AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
was named killer AS9100 Supplier Approval Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
R AS9100 - 8.4.2 - Receiving Inspection Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B AS9100 8.4.1 Supplier Selection/Evaluation criteria and reevaluations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
S Effective nonconforming process for AS9100 8.7 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
O Adding ISO 13485 to an AS9100 QMS ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
M Customers Request AS9100 certification - Small Company (less than 20 employees) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
NDesouza AS9100 - D Capacity Planning Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
D ISO 9001 & AS9100 Certificate issued by a consultant for a Distributor Registrars and Notified Bodies 11
B FAR/Prime Contractor Flow-down Tool - AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
K AS9100 - 7.3 - Are these black and white questions with specific correct answers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
A Does AS9100 require traceability to operators performing the work? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
R Traceability on Unmarked Parts - AS9100 requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
M When is FAI required? AS9100 8.5.1.3 and 8.4.3 requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
M Ethics and Legality AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
K Counterfeit parts prevention - Audit Nonconformance - AS9100 8.2.2 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 25
classical_quality AS9100 Surveillance Audit - advice on drafting strong responses AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
L AS9100 - Infrastructure or Product? Inflight internet connectivity network AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
C AS9100 Rev D 8.1.1 & APQP - Operational risk management process AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
T AS9100 - Changing PEARs target AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 41
R AS9100 DELTA FAI - Sub-supplier for plating changed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
G AS9100-8.1.2 Configuration Management AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
R AS9100 REV D gap analysis matrix AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
Sidney Vianna Informational New IAQG Document - AS9100 Clarifications of Intent AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
E Recommendations for CBs south of England AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
T Was Just told we could ONLY buy material for AS9100 customers if the DISTRIBUTION house is AS9100 / AS9120 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
E AS9100 installtion procedure AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
Q Connecting AS9100 D Clause 4.2 to 9.3.2 b - Interested parties and relevant issues AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 24
D AS9100 Inspection records - Is there a requirement to have gauge ID and calibration status AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
O Identifying KPI for AS9100 8.1.4 - Prevention of Counterfeit Parts - PCB assembly contract manufacturer AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
L AS9100 and Agile development processes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
I Is this a Major AS9100 QMS change - Quality Concerns AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
C E signatures on Engineering Change Notes AS9100 / AS9116 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
T QMS Training for my organization - IATF16949 and also AS9100 or 9145 Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
W Tying the need for Demand Planning to a section of AS9100/9110 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
bryan willemot Documenting past problem history for fasteners for AS9100 Rev D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
was named killer AS9100 FAIR - True Position hole out by .0011" on 50 parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom