R
Randy Stewart
Has there been any talk of how to approach change C to AMS 2700?
AMS QQ-P-35 "A" was cancelled in 2-05 and we were suppose to move to AMS 2700 "B". However, the Primes didn't like some of the wording (Citric Acid use) and the sample plans so we were told to use AMS QQ-P-35 "98". (Which was superceeded by Rev-A but both A & 98 were released in May '98!) Now, 2700 Rev-C has changed the language to follow QQ-P closer and has gone back to the MIL-STD for sampling. However, it does state that when parts come in and testing is called out per AMS QQ-P-35 that verification testing must be accomplished per 2700.
So now, I don't think AMS QQ-P-35 has been cancelled but I'm not real sure.
We still get PO's calling out ASTM E-1444-99! So it's not just telling the customer, I have to work to the latest and he has to request what's on the print.
AMS QQ-P-35 "A" was cancelled in 2-05 and we were suppose to move to AMS 2700 "B". However, the Primes didn't like some of the wording (Citric Acid use) and the sample plans so we were told to use AMS QQ-P-35 "98". (Which was superceeded by Rev-A but both A & 98 were released in May '98!) Now, 2700 Rev-C has changed the language to follow QQ-P closer and has gone back to the MIL-STD for sampling. However, it does state that when parts come in and testing is called out per AMS QQ-P-35 that verification testing must be accomplished per 2700.
So now, I don't think AMS QQ-P-35 has been cancelled but I'm not real sure.
We still get PO's calling out ASTM E-1444-99! So it's not just telling the customer, I have to work to the latest and he has to request what's on the print.