AS9100D Non-conformance for 10.2.1 b 2 and 10.2.1. b 3 e and f - Corrective Action
- Thread starter ImLost
- Start date
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
If you have a procedure, then state how these items are covered or addressed. If no procedure I have seen companies address this by including this as part of their form/system. The Human Factors as you described and the other two as a part of the closure of CAR where it is a question whether R/O or QMS changes/updates are needed to further address the CAR.
I think adding notes to your CA form is probably the most helpful. How many people actually refer to the procedure after a while? That can lead to a miss or forgetfulness. You always have the form in front of you during the CA process. Just check the box that you considered the requirement and move on.
VERY good point @Golfman25!
So now - to play into that - it has to be considered, but does there need to always been an answer - would it be too simple to put buttons for YES and NO (as in were R/O considered)?
So now - to play into that - it has to be considered, but does there need to always been an answer - would it be too simple to put buttons for YES and NO (as in were R/O considered)?
There are four clauses referenced. You said you already added Human factors to your CAR. AS9100 says
10.2.1 b. evaluate the need for action to eliminate the cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere, by: [... ]
- 2. determining the causes of the nonconformity, including, as applicable, those related to human factors;
- 3. determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur;
- e. update risks and opportunities determined during planning, if necessary;
- f. make changes to the quality management system, if necessary;
I suggest you add comment fields to your CAR form whether
(b3) this problem/failure reads across to other lots, product lines or departments (use words that make sense in your factory).
(e) your risk document was/was-not updated based on this incident (if not, why?)
(f) QMS changes were made (if so, what? if not necessary, why?)
10.2.1 b. evaluate the need for action to eliminate the cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere, by: [... ]
- 2. determining the causes of the nonconformity, including, as applicable, those related to human factors;
- 3. determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur;
- e. update risks and opportunities determined during planning, if necessary;
- f. make changes to the quality management system, if necessary;
I suggest you add comment fields to your CAR form whether
(b3) this problem/failure reads across to other lots, product lines or departments (use words that make sense in your factory).
(e) your risk document was/was-not updated based on this incident (if not, why?)
(f) QMS changes were made (if so, what? if not necessary, why?)
