AS9120B Clause 8.4.1.1 External Providers Scope of Approval

QualityStandardsGirl

Starting to get Involved
#1
We just went through our AS9120B upgrade audit and got a non-conformance on Clause 8.4.1.1 The organization has not fully maintained a register of external providers that includes the scope of approval.

We had our approved external providers listed as Supplier (distributors), Vendor (repair vendors), Both (Supplier & Repair Vendor) or Non-Aviation. The auditor said that didn't break it down far enough. We are wondering how far you need to break down the scope of approval. Would it be ok to say the vendor is approved for Engine repairs or airframe repairs or does it need to be more in depth than that?

I tried looking at some of our customer's AVL and I am finding all different things.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Perspicuity

Aim small, miss small.
#3
An AS9120 QMS system should have supplier categorizations that are second to none; after all, supply chain management and inventory control are undoubtedly your core competencies. This said, I would not look to my customers’ AVL’s for guidance since they are probably not AS9120.

Commodity/service type approval scopes are probably the most common; however, dependent upon the needs of your business you may opt for something different. Maybe you can expand upon what you already have (e.g. Surplus Distribution, ASA100 Distribution, AS9120 Distribution, FAA Repair, AS9110 Repair, Nadcap Processor, etc.).

Remember, an auditor may gig you for sending a flight control to a supplier you have approved for “Engine Repair” even if that supplier has an FAA approval for both propulsion and airframe.

I would stay away from scopes such as Full Approval, Conditional Approval, or the like. These pertain to approval status and not scope.
 

doctall41

Involved In Discussions
#4
We just went through our AS9120B upgrade audit and got a non-conformance on Clause 8.4.1.1 The organization has not fully maintained a register of external providers that includes the scope of approval.

We had our approved external providers listed as Supplier (distributors), Vendor (repair vendors), Both (Supplier & Repair Vendor) or Non-Aviation. The auditor said that didn't break it down far enough. We are wondering how far you need to break down the scope of approval. Would it be ok to say the vendor is approved for Engine repairs or airframe repairs or does it need to be more in depth than that?

I tried looking at some of our customer's AVL and I am finding all different things.
Full Disclosure, I think QualityStandardsGirl and I had the same auditor, a couple of weeks apart. My auditor also said the Scope of my External Providers was not broken down enough. I actually agree with her on that. For example, on my outside processors for Penetrant, anodize, prime, cad plate, topcoat, etc, I have them listed as Finishes.
For something like that, how do you guys have the scope listed for your outside processors? Do you list everything they are approved to do?
Thanks in advance for your help!
doctall41
 

Perspicuity

Aim small, miss small.
#5
I think listing “everything they are approved to do” is not required, misleading, unmanageable and risky. It is important to step back and understand the dynamics of an ASL/AVL. Is it your list? Does it contain directed sources? Are you a prime? Do you build-to-print? Do you design? What about fixed processes?

Some of the biggest companies have it easy; they make a list of suppliers and include a basic listing of what these suppliers provide.

A build-to-print company (for example) must be attentive to their own suppliers, the suppliers of their customer(s), and suppliers unique to their industry. If customer A says you can use Acme Finish Inc for penetrant and anodize, while customer B says Acme Finish Inc can only be used for chem-film, whose supplier scope listing are you managing? Your own or your customers’? To me, this may be a “Special Process Source” or may be a “Directed Source”.

Requisitions, purchase orders, MRP systems (item master listings) are intended to control procurement (when coupled with competent buyers)! “Approval scopes” are rightfully intended to be abbreviated. To merely state a source is approved for penetrant inspection can be misleading? Are they approved for ASTM-E-1417, MIL-I-6866, BAC 5423, or another of the myriads of penetrant specs? Are they competent with titanium castings or do they just use visible dye on structural steel? Are they capable of pre-penetrant etch and if so will they scrap your expensive assembly because they don’t really understand when not to etch?

The key is to make your approval scope work for you and arguably effective without the introduction of misleading risk. Also, I stand by my original statement: An AS9120 system should have a procurement system second to none.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#6
An AS9120 system should have a procurement system second to none.
While I agree with the opinion in theory, the reality is: most pass-through aerospace distributors are small organizations without the resources and knowledge to perform in-depth supplier assessments.

If one were to expect a small aerospace distributor to have a robust supplier quality function to the level of an OEM, most AS9120 certificates would have to be revoked.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W AS9120B - How to meet clause 7 Support that covers 7.1., 7.1.1, 7.1.2, & 7.1.3? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 10
Q AS9120B flow down to external providers: Records Retention AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
Q AS9120B - ESD monitoring devices part of 7.1.5 AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 7
P AS9120B Control of External Providers for Franchised Distribution AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
W AS9120B 8.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
A Failed the AS9120B Exam Twice.....Need Help AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 7
C Are zero defect sampling plans relevant to AS9120B Distributor AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4
Q Customer Requirements - AS9120B Audit Finding AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 24
E AS9120B 8.4.2a Ensuring external providers remain within control of the QMS AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 6
W AS9120B QMS and its process AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
E Online training for an internal auditor to AS9120B AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
W AS9120B 8.4.3 Information for External Providers AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
W AS9120A to AS9120B transition AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
D AS9100D vs AS9120B differences AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
E PEMS Hazards - IEC 60601 Clause 14.6 - Internal data use - Pressure sensor IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S MDR GSPR Clause 17 - Software Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 2
B IEC 60601-2-43 - Clause 203.6.103 - Physical button? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K Contamination Control - Class Is medical devices (Clause 6.4.2 ISO 13485:2016 (E)) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
A ISO 13485 - Clause 8.3.3 appropriate actions in response to nonconforming product ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Description of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.3 manufacturing process audit- needs your feedback IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
A ISO 41001:2018 - Clause No.8 Operations Part Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 2
L AS5553 Clause 3.1.7 e "Control packaging material ..................reused" AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
R What is meant by Use of COMPONENTS WITH HIGH-INTEGRITY CHARACTERISTICS in ME EQUIPMENT (clause no 4.9) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
K What is mean by Oxygen Rich Environment as per the IEC 60601-1 clause no 11.2.2 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
P Definition of production tooling in IATF16949 clause 8.5.1.6 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
K ISO 13485:2016, Clause 4.2.3 Medical Device File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
I Master Document Access - ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.3 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
Q Why new clause (7.1.6) in ISO 9001:2015? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
B Clause 5.1.12 of Technical Standard IEC 62304/A1 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
F ISO 13485 8.2.3 Reporting to regulatory authorities: Question regarding a procedure for this clause. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
R Process control documents - Context of API Spec Q1, Clause 5.7.1.3 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
T ISO 17025:2017 Clause 4.2.2 - The difference between "be notified" and "be informed" ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
O How can I justify excluding the R&D group and the design and development clause? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7, sub clause 7.11 Control of data and information management ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
V IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 4.1 Impartiality ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the validity of results - Threshold ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.4.1 - Requirements for Procedures ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
F Measurement Audit and ILC for ISO 17025 Clause 7.7.2 - Comparison with results of other laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
K ISO 17025:2017 clause 7.6.2 - Performing calibration of its own equipment shall evaluate the measurement uncertainty ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
S What's meant by ISO9001 clause 8.7 non conforming output? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
K AS9100D Clause 7.5.2.a) - What is considered to be "documented information"? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
A Fire hazard classification - Clause in IEC 60601 about gauze and electricity ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 0
S Clause 8.2.2 Determining the requirements for products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 Design for an education services provider ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 - Design & Development for training course center ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
L ISO 13485:2016 Clause 8.4 - Analysis of Audit Observations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
C Determining if Maintenance Contractor is an External Service subject to ISO 9001 Clause 8.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 43
Q Connecting AS9100 D Clause 4.2 to 9.3.2 b - Interested parties and relevant issues AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 24
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom