Audit issues help

T

Timmers

#1
:truce:

I don't know if this is the correct area t post these questions or not, but we recently went through a pre audit and I had some issues that i need help with, and since I did not get to speak to the auditor before he left I could not ask him what some of these actually mean. I am new to all of this so if I sound ignorant or dumb please forgive me.

1. No evidence that our gagetracking software is certified to meet with QS9000 3rd edition. I have called the software vendor and they aren't sure what is needed.

2. No evidence that "Master" blocks (grade 3 ) are adequate to calibrate our measuring equipment. Now, we don't manufacture rockets so we don't have a very tight tolerance on our parts
( most parts we have .030" - .120"). So wouldn't a grade three that is used only for checking and calibrating our equipment be adequate?

3. Calibration procedures do not meet with "international" practices. What are international practices?

4. Develop a "drop off" policy and place visual aids at the working stations. What is a drop off policy?

I hope these questions don't sound silly, but if any one has been through this and knows what I am talking about, I could sure use the help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

D.Scott

#2
Timmers - First and foremost - call the auditor and get his advice on what he found and what he means by the findings.

It looks to me as though there is a lot missing for us to make a definate statement but I will try to venture a guess. My comments are only my opinion and certainly aren't authorative.

1) Not knowing what software you use and what you use it for, I am not sure where he is going - If you only track your gages, I don't know of a requirement for certification. If you are using a gage R&R program in the software, it should follow the MSA guidelines. It was my understanding that commercial software was exempt from this verification but I may not be on the right line of thought here.

2) Your Master Blocks should be traceable to an NIST standard and you should be able to provide calibration certificates for each. The certificate should have all the requirements covered. The Masters should be able to verify accuracy of the calibrated device in increments suitable for your measurement needs. If you stick with 10:1, you should be ok.

3) Not sure here but he could be referring to ISO Guide 17025.

4) This sounds like an "opportunity for improvement" to establish a policy for handling gages on the floor. It sounds like there is currently no organization of gages and they are out on the floor with no control over who has them and maybe no way to verify the current state of calibration. The "drop off area" would serve as a central point for gage control.

These answers are intended to get you going but check with the auditor on these points. It sounds to me like you did pretty well for a pre-audit if those were the only issues. It should be an easy thing to fix and you are on your way.

Good luck - and welcome to the Cove.

Dave
 
#3
Timmers,
You should contact your auditor and review the NCR's. I can provide a "guess" as to what he may be referring to.

"1. No evidence that our gagetracking software is certified to meet with QS9000 3rd edition. I have called the software vendor and they aren't sure what is needed. "
- Products are not certified to QS9000, Companies are. He may be referring to you supplier development process.

"2. No evidence that "Master" blocks (grade 3 ) are adequate to calibrate our measuring equipment. Now, we don't manufacture rockets so we don't have a very tight tolerance on our parts
( most parts we have .030" - .120"). So wouldn't a grade three that is used only for checking and calibrating our equipment be adequate?"
- For QS he may be referring to 4.11.2.a

3. Calibration procedures do not meet with "international" practices. What are international practices?
- For QS he may be referring to 4.11.2.b.1 2nd para.

4. Develop a "drop off" policy and place visual aids at the working stations. What is a drop off policy?
- Never heard of the term.
 
Q

qualitymanager

#5
M Greenway,

Are you referring to the requirement in ISO/IEC 17025:1999 (clause 5.5.7) which says equipment which may have been mishandled (dropping a gauge seems to me mishandling) has to be taken out of service? (I'm no expert on 17025 - I've only done a 2-day overview of the clauses. I don't have any experience with QS-9000).

Arguing the semantics ("drop off policy") I'd interpret what Timmers says as probably meaning a policy on responsibility for custody of items/equipment.

We'll have to wait on the response from the auditor, I guess.


qualitymanager
 
M

M Greenaway

#6
My aplologies.

I was thinking QS9000 when I replied, however probably meant Ford Q1 (I think its in there).
 
R

Randy Stewart

#7
Drop Off

What is a drop off policy?
Our "Drop Off" policy is that dates are posted throughout the shop when gages are due for calibration and the individuals (employee owned gages) who own the due gages drop them off at QA for calibration.
I could be that simple.
I know I don't have all the information from your planning visit so I say this just from the information you provided.
I would question the professionalism of the auditor if s/he left you with these questions after a planning visit. They may not have given you the corrections needed but they sure could have explained themselves better. You can see by the different answers posted here, from people that have been in the trenches for years, and we still don't really know what the auditor was asking for!
If you are responsible for the calibration and the auditor did not go over their findings with you, then IMHO the auditor has not done their job properly. Contact your registrar / account mgr. and get some resolution.
 
M

M Greenaway

#8
Good points Randy.

The audit findings should be specific.

I would be inclined to 'play the game' and close the first finding based on the fact that there is no requirement in QS9000 for calibration management software to be certified to meet with QS9000 third edition.

For the second finding I would ask the auditor to prove they were inadequate.

The third requirement is only a recommendation in QS9000.

And the fourth finding is utter rubbish as there is no requirement for a 'drop off policy' or mandatory visual aids required by QS9000.

Did the auditor have any specific evidence that the system was not working ? Did you hae loads of uncalibrated gauges in use, where calibrated gauges giving erroneous readings, was there an element of gauge management that your computer system could not handle ?
 
T

Timmers

#9
Thanks everyone. You are being very helpful by bringing up all these questions that I never would have thought about. I am having my dept. manager get a hold of the auditor so we can clear up some of these questions.

Thanks again.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K ISO 13485 Audit Finding on Regulatory Issues - Internal Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
H Supplier Audit (Desktop) Issues Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 19
S External Audit Non-Conformance - Control Plan and Inspection Issues IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
A Quality Audit Advice - Past Due Device Calibrations due to Cal Supplier Issues Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 14
MarilynJ6354 Internal Audit Corrective Actions Log issues - ISO 9001 Clause 8.2.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A ISO 9001 3rd Party Audit Preparation - Open Issues Aspects General Auditing Discussions 81
S Audit finding - "Cost of Poor Quality" reporting - Confidentiality Issues IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
M How to answer ISO9001:2015 audit finding of old revisions of documents being used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
B UKRP to what level should you audit Class I Technical Documentation? UK Medical Device Regulations 0
I Audit is tomorrow but I refused to participate Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 17
I ISO 17025:2017 / ANAB 3125 - Articulating / Communicating Risks vis-a-vis Audit Findings ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
D Verify Audit Trail of SaaS system Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Outsourced Internal Audit requirements for Aerospace Suppliers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 16
D Number of people to be interviewed during an internal audit? Internal Auditing 6
B Gamma Quarterly Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
A Anxiety - ISO Re-registration Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 69
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Q Easy CARs for Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Quarterly Dose Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
H When is a SOC 2 audit necessary? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
J NCR- Failure of contract review process - NADCAP audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
A Internal audit plan and processes for ISO 14001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
C API Q1 internal audit report Internal Auditing 3
P Filled in F48/F49 for internal audit ISO 17025:2017 Internal Auditing 2
A IRIS audit - Discussion about Special Processes General Auditing Discussions 11
J Internal audit random sampling methodology Internal Auditing 2
D Major NC from last audit not fixed not sure how to fix General Auditing Discussions 10
X Sample SOC2 audit report (or a redacted one) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit General Auditing Discussions 2
G Organizing internal audit program for an Integrated QHSE Management System Internal Auditing 13
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
W How do you phrase your internal audit questions? Internal Auditing 3
Z Steps to take before an MDSAP audit for Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
V Csv, excel format - audit trail file of HPLC system ( Empower, openlab, EZchrom or any other ) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
G Not accepting a non conformity during an audit General Auditing Discussions 11
K IATF audit day requirements table 5.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
M IATF - Internal Audit 3 year span Internal Auditing 4
Q Audit report template ISO 9001/14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
Q ISO 9001-2015 Internal audit finding Internal Auditing 14
lanley liao How to understand this words that the planning of internal audit shall take into consideration the results of previous audits? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
P Audit check for IT company (ISO 9001) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
D Supplier audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Go Live With New ERP System before Recertification Audit General Auditing Discussions 6
A Add MDSAP to Internal Audit Schedule Medical Device Related Regulations 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom