Audit NC - No evidence of a full 5 Why Analysis for the Customer Complaint

krishkaar

Involved In Discussions
#1
Recently in one of the audits, the auditor raised a Non-conformance as follows:
'No evidence of a full 5 why-why analysis for the customer complaint received ..................
The analysis stops at 2 whys and proposes a corrective action.'
(the action initiated is acceptable to the customer)
We tried to debate the issue with the auditor. But he was firm in raising the NC.

Is he justified?
Is it always a must that a 5 whys- have to be gone thro' without breaking the number of whys?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Stijloor

Leader
Super Moderator
#2
Re: 5 Why Analysis

Recently in one of the audits, the auditor raised a Non-conformance as follows:
'No evidence of a full 5 why-why analysis for the customer complaint received ..................
The analysis stops at 2 whys and proposes a corrective action.'
(the action initiated is acceptable to the customer)
We tried to debate the issue with the auditor. But he was firm in raising the NC.

Is he justified?
Is it always a must that a 5 whys- have to be gone thro' without breaking the number of whys?
This is a typical example of an auditor either not understanding the concept of 5-why analysis or getting caught up in the number "5". The number 5 is irrelevant. The intent is to ask "why" a few more times to get beyond the symptoms and getting closer to the real root causes. This may happen after three "Why's", and sometimes after eight "Why's".

Now, having said this, the corrective action (which was accepted by your customer) still needs to demonstrate its effectiveness. If you have evidence that the nonconformity can not recur, you have a case, and I would appeal the nonconformity.

Stijloor.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
#3
No, he isn't. Unless your corrective action process mandates the 5-why technique. It is very frustrating to see rampant incompetence in the auditing profession. Any auditing 101 class teaches you that, a basic requirement for a valid nonconformity is the existence of a requirement. There are a number of techniques to reach a root cause of a problem and the 5 W technique is just one of them. The auditor can not unilaterally impose this technique onto your organization.

If the auditor wants to write your system up for ineffective corrective actions, he must find evidence to that effect.
 

Stijloor

Leader
Super Moderator
#4
No, he isn't. Unless your corrective action process mandates the 5-why technique.
And that may be the sticking point. Organizations inflict a lot of undue pain upon themselves by imposing too specific and too detailed requirements in an effort to look good.... :mg: The OP's predicament may be an example of this.

Stijloor.
 

qusys

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Recently in one of the audits, the auditor raised a Non-conformance as follows:
'No evidence of a full 5 why-why analysis for the customer complaint received ..................
The analysis stops at 2 whys and proposes a corrective action.'
(the action initiated is acceptable to the customer)
We tried to debate the issue with the auditor. But he was firm in raising the NC.

Is he justified?
Is it always a must that a 5 whys- have to be gone thro' without breaking the number of whys?
It seems very strange to me to raise a similar NC. Which kind of audit was it? Registrar?? Please, give us more details.
The 5-Why's does not mandate to ask 5 times why, the number 5 is related to the fact that it is reasonable after 5 times asking why to the previous why you reach the root cause.
Personnaly, I would have asked for the verification ofthe effectiveness of the corrective action and check for evidence that the customer accepted it.
See you:bigwave:
 

krishkaar

Involved In Discussions
#7
Thanks for the various replies.

The NC issued (by a auditor under training) is during a Surveillance audit under the scope of ISO 9001:2008.

The issue was taken up with the Certification Body big-wigs and is pending clarification.

For obvious reasons, we are NOT inclined to provide the details of the auditor OR the Registrar.

Thanks for the understanding.
 

qusys

Trusted Information Resource
#8
Thanks for the various replies.

The NC issued (by a auditor under training) is during a Surveillance audit under the scope of ISO 9001:2008.

The issue was taken up with the Certification Body big-wigs and is pending clarification.

For obvious reasons, we are NOT inclined to provide the details of the auditor OR the Registrar.

Thanks for the understanding.
Hi,
thanks for replying.
Based upon the shared details, I think it will be overridden by CB.
Pls, keep us informed
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Best practices for capturing audit objective evidence in a practical manner? Internal Auditing 3
B IATF 16949 Cl. 9.2.2.1 - Internal audit program - Types of evidence Internal Auditing 1
R What objective evidence can/can't be supplied during a customer audit? General Auditing Discussions 3
L Audit Ethics and Practices regarding Evidence Internal Auditing 18
Chennaiite Audit Objective Evidence - the holy **** Imported Legacy Blogs 1
K Evidence Documentation in Internal Audit Reports Internal Auditing 24
M Audit Interview as Evidence to issue a CAR (Corrective Action Request) General Auditing Discussions 13
Q Audit Approach and Burden of Evidence Internal Auditing 4
B Certification Body insist on evidence of Preventive Action during Stage 2 audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
B How is Objective Evidence Admitted in an Internal Audit? Internal Auditing 8
M "Lessons Learned System" - Evidence for Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
C Objective Evidence of Internal Auditors having Audit Clause 4.1. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
P NC from TS16949 stage 2 audit - Internal Auditing - Auditor did not record evidence General Auditing Discussions 15
C Internal Audit Report Data and Evidence Internal Auditing 3
A Audit Findings - Evidence that a System is Ineffective General Auditing Discussions 13
C Audit NonConformance - Evidence of Post Market Vigilance and Product Recall. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Q Objective Evidence - Internal Audit Training in a Cargo Company Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
R What is Objective Evidence in an Audit? Written? Visual? Both? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
G Opening meeting - internal audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Ed Panek Audit Protocol? Simultaneous surveillance and recertification audits. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
D Is a lost calibrated tool an non-conformance for an audit? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 58
D IATF16949 external audit plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B 8.5.1.1 Control Plan - question audit NC IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
D ISO 9001:2015 Recertification Audit Timing ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
Mr Roo Discovered dishonesty after performing an internal audit General Auditing Discussions 4
Q 10.3 Continual improvement - How to audit it? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
H Audit Checklist for European Authorized Representative EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Q Product audit assessment IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S Customer audit report review and approval ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Moncia Integrated QMS and audit Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
G Audit & Agreements for "Test Laboratory" Supplier? US Medical Device Regulations 4
J New QMS Auditor - seeking opportunities to gain audit experience Career and Occupation Discussions 3
M IATF external audit NC closure IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
W IATF 9.2.2.1 Internal Audit how to determine risk IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
M Multiple time zones in the Audit Trail Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 7
X Looking for 17025 auditor to perform internal audit on IT software testing laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A API Q1 9th Edition Surveillance Audit - Quality Policy Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
S Audit Finding - Design History File (DHF) Index: few (3 to 4) reports not identified ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
xfngrs 3 year audit cycle IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
Q NACE Code 25.6 no reduction in CB audit days? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
J 9001 Internal Audit of Client Onboarding process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
H Streamlining audit response and corrective action processes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
Q Corrective Action Notification - Registration Audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
chris1price Irradiation site for dose audit Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
PQ Systems 5 Ways to Reduce Stress on Your Next Audit Using GAGEpack Software 0
PQ Systems Audit Prep – Time for a System Health Check Using GAGEpack Software 0
N API Q1 Audit Surveillance - Questions Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
A Alternative to on site audit in China EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Help to understand and response to API AAR during the re-certification audit Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 17
B Internal audit checklist Internal Auditing 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom