Audit Observations - Is there a requirement to Respond to Observations?

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
Saw this. Any coments here?

From: "David Jenkins"
Newsgroups: misc.industry.quality
Subject: Registrar comments

Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:09:51 GMT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Xref: sn-us misc.industry.quality:16278

Just wondering if anyone else has observed this from an auditor on an ISO
9001:2000 registration audit?

They found one minor nonconformance and made a 'comment' on three other
issues. They are trying to insist that we respond to these 'comments' as
well as the nonconformance before confirming registration. On being
challenged as to whether these comments were really 'minor or
potential-minor nonconformances' they replied no - they were justs things
they would like to see changed: they could not point to non-complience with
the standard.

I've been through a fair number of ISO audits with our clients, but have
never run across this behavior before. Anyone else seen this?

David Jenkins
White Rock BC
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Randy Stewart

#2
Unfortunately, yes. One of the sites I use to be responsible for received a minor during the next audit because we didn't respond to the OFI. However, 1 incident out of all the audits in the past 6 years isn't a bad percentage.

:bonk:
 
M

M Greenaway

#3
I have never experienced this, and find it quite alarming.

However what you could do is document it in your CA system, conduct an investigation, come to the conclusion that you cannot identify that there is any non-compliance (which your auditor must agree with), and then close the CA with 'no-action'.

Unless of course you really want to go to war on it, in which case tell the guy to ............. off
 

gpainter

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
Our Registrar does not require a response on Opportunity for Improvements. They are also not allowed to write an OFI during a registration. File a grievance with the registrar
 
#5
How do you define "respond"?

All "observations" need some form of response, if only to say that nothing will be done. If that is what the registrar is looking for; evidence that you considered the observation, then great. If, on the other hand, the registrar is looking for you to “fix” the observation, then I would have an issue. If it requires “fixing” it should be a nonconformance, not an observation. If the situation is conforming, then not “fix” should be required.
 

SteelMaiden

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#6
Guess I can't say how kosher these opportunities for improvement and responses are, but here is what I have done in the past.

We have welcomed any and all observations pertaining to opportunities for improvement. We also let our registrar know that while we welcome them, we may not choose to do the exact things that the auditor is looking for, we will do what is best for us. Our registrar has never required a formal action plan for OFIs. We do (quality team members) sit down with the auditor prior to the closing meeting and discuss them. We may come up with a plan right there, or not. But at least the auditor knows we are aware, and will keep them in mind. Usually these improvement opportunities lead to the next surveillance audit, and they give us a chance to maybe take care of a potential problem before it happens. Obviously, if they were in nonconformance now, we'd get a finding. Usually it is just a feeling from the evidence collected in the current audit that there is a potential for nonconformance down the road.

I don't know, maybe we are pretty naive, but we like to partner with our registrar and keep everything pretty low-key and friendly.
 
J

Jim Biz

#7
Two way situation

I've seen this happen in two different situations

1) auditor "using" an improvement as a warning
(ie explaining that although it is wiitten as a "Suggestion" if nothing changes by the next visit - I'll find a way to write a nonconformance for it.....

2) Auditor Using improvement suggestins to "mold" the clients system to his viewpoint. Ie your system would be better in my opinion if you did this or that........


Of course the auditor that explains "this is what I think and you can take it and run with it OR ignore it completley is correct.
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#8
my experience

During our initial audit, our registrar found some OFIs. They included them in their report, but did not require a written response. We did have 3 minors written, and we had to respond to those before we received our certification.

CarolX
 
#9
Oh yeah

One additional thing I forgot, for some reason SteelMaiden's post reminded me of it. If an observation points to something that would be of benefit, then without a doubt follow-up, regardless of whether the registrar says you have to.
 
R

RosieA

#10
Two out of the three Registrars I have used required responses to Observations.

Both described it as being a warning about a future finding.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L ISO 13485:2016 Clause 8.4 - Analysis of Audit Observations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
Q Stage 1 audit observations - documented report? General Auditing Discussions 5
S ISO 9001 Audit Observations - Transitioning my career into auditing Career and Occupation Discussions 16
P Secretly Auditing - Writing an audit report with observations based on my experiences Internal Auditing 12
S Do I need to answer Audit Observations? General Auditing Discussions 33
V Classification of Audit Observations - Regulatory References US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
D Need to follow-up Internal Audit 'Observations' ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
A Can Internal Audit Observations be kept confidential from State FDA inspections ? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
A Quality Objectives 5.4.1 - KPI SOP - ISO 13485 Audit Observations EU Medical Device Regulations 6
V Most Common Internal/External Audit Observations on Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
I Observations Outside of the Audit Scope General Auditing Discussions 37
C Closure of CARs (Corrective Action Requests) and Audit Observations Internal Auditing 25
C Is approval needed for adopting observations made during audit? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
W TS 16949 Audit - Examples of Major & Minor NC's and Observations for Stage 1&2 audit. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
B Responding to ISO9001 Audit NCR?s/Observations - ?Top Management? ? Clause 5.4 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 24
M Linkage of Internal Audit Observations to Business Risk ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
B Responding to ISO9001 or TS16949 Audit NCR?s/Observations. Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
B IATF16949 audit requirement - Auditor request UCL and LCL must be show Xbar-R, IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
T COVID, Furlough and ISO9001 Surveillance Audit Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
R External Audit and Certificate prorogation due to the pandemic General Auditing Discussions 10
Dean Bell Implementation of Controls as per SOA for Stage 2 Audit IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
G Logistic organization and controls - IATF/ISO 9001 audit Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
Geoff Cotton Performing a Delta Audit General Auditing Discussions 12
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G MSA check list to audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
L Open Positions During AS9100 Audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
L Stage 2 audit - Requirement for 3 months of records ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
F Who can sit in/perform an API audit? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
L Manufacturing Process Audit Help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
H AS9100 Checklist for Internal Audit needed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 4
F Internal Audit before Pre-Assessment ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Q Internal audit plan template Internal Auditing 5
G Self Assessment Audit from a new potential customer General Auditing Discussions 3
L Internal audit during COVID-19 restrictions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M OEM asking for NC report after certification audit. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Ooi Yew Jin Customer E audit preparation Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 2
N Audit non-compliance API Q1 - Use of External Documents 4.4.4 in Product Realization Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 4
J Remote Audit Experiences - June 2020 General Auditing Discussions 26
F Product audit sampling plans IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
O ISO13485 implementation - Are internal audits expected before stage 1 audit? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
M Supplier Audit Report - Template for second party audit wanted Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
Stefan Mundt AS9100D Major nonconformity due to recurrence of a NC during a subsequent CB audit. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q ISO 9001:2015 man days for surveillance audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
F ISO 13485 - EU countries that could request another audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
H Layered audit updates after COVID-19 shutdowns Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 0
L How to deal with an ISO 13485 Supplier Audit nonconformance ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
M Description of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.3 manufacturing process audit- needs your feedback IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Armen Conflict of Interest if I audit the QC department? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16

Similar threads

Top Bottom