Audit Readiness/Sillyness

W

Wallyowally

#1
Audit Readiness Sillyness

Hi all,

I'm new here. What a great place, the information abounds!

I haven't been audited for several years so I have a question if certain practices still exist. I considered these some of the silly parts :vfunny: of ISO 9000.

1. Quality Policies: Is is still required/preferred for all employees to memorize the policy? I just can't do the little plastic card thing as it seems too fake/hokey for me.

2. "For reference only". If the QMS is online, is it still necessary to write "For reference only" on all printed documents? At my last company this was a little exercise we did before each audit and it made the auditor happy.

Thanks,

Wally
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Wallyowally said:
Hi all,

I'm new here. What a great place, the information abounds!

I haven't been audited for several years so I have a question if certain practices still exist. I considered these some of the silly parts :vfunny: of ISO 9000.

1. Quality Policies: Is is still required/preferred for all employees to memorize the policy? I just can't do the little plastic card thing as it seems too fake/hokey for me.

2. "For reference only". If the QMS is online, is it still necessary to write "For reference only" on all printed documents? At my last company this was a little exercise we did before each audit and it made the auditor happy.

Thanks,

Wally
First of all, Wally Welcome to the Cove! :bigwave:


Both of these things have be tossed about over a variety of threads. But here is my quick take.

1. Your folks need to "Know" the quality policy. They need to know how it affects them and how they affect it. Just memorizing it or reading it off a card does little to make it "real" to them (IMNSHO)

2. "For reference only" has recently been discussed in our documentation forum (I believe). But I say that all "for reference only" material needs to be burned. If you use it, it needs to be controlled.

Hope that helps.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#3
db said:
2. "For reference only" has recently been discussed in our documentation forum (I believe). But I say that all "for reference only" material needs to be burned. If you use it, it needs to be controlled.
Theoretically, true and I agree. I'm not a fan of uncontrolled documents by any means.

But in the real world there are lots of reasons for uncontrolled copies of documents in a company. It really depends upon the company, their processes and other factors.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#4
Hiya Wally..... :bigwave:

1st..Go along with db on this.

2nd..whenever I see one of those silly plastic cards I tend to have a post traumatic stress disorder attack (former Marine here), as do other auditors
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#5
1. Agree with db on this one. Personally, I never ask "What is your Quality Policy?" - instead, I ask "What does it mean to you?" or "How does your job impact Quality?" Sure, I've heard some pretty interesting responses, but these questions will illicit responses that are more informative than asking them to repeat the Quality Policy back at you.

2. You need to document your document control processes, right? So in there, put in something to the effect that all electronic documents are controlled copies and all hard copies are not unless otherwise indicated with a stamp in a non-black ink. Gets away from that "For Reference Only" mumbo-jumbo that never really impressed me. In my organization, all controlled documents are maintained electronically. Unfortunately, with the nature of my organization, should the computer system crash, we can not stop our manufacturing processes - so there are some controlled hard copies on the floor that are clearly identified via a non-black ink stamp and who's location is recorded within our document control software.
 

gpainter

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
1. The QP does not have to be from memory. The important question is how does what you do help your company to achieve it. Cards- are they controlled, how will you replace all them in a 1000person company and make sure you get them all back- try banners, a lot easier to control. MO get rid of the QP completely, remove it from the standard. I guess it is a Dr. D thing.
2. How do you define it? If an operator uses it, then it is a WI and needs control.
 
L

leanne - 2009

#7
db said:
First of all, Wally Welcome to the Cove! :bigwave:

Both of these things have be tossed about over a variety of threads. But here is my quick take.

1. Your folks need to "Know" the quality policy. They need to know how it affects them and how they affect it. Just memorizing it or reading it off a card does little to make it "real" to them (IMNSHO)

2. "For reference only" has recently been discussed in our documentation forum (I believe). But I say that all "for reference only" material needs to be burned. If you use it, it needs to be controlled.

Hope that helps.
:bigwave:

Agreed on number 1.

On number two, are we talking about hard copies of QMS docs or something else entirely? Our QMS docs print out with verbiage indicating that the controlled copy is online. Our drawings are also online. Some people do better with a paper copy than on screen. Including me at times. I just cannot study a complex C or D sized casting drawing on a 17" monitor. I want a hard copy on my desk. As an auditor, I do not have a problem with this as long as the auditee shows me they are checking the online version for current status before using a hard copy printed version. Technically, these hard copies are uncontrolled & "for reference only". Or are you talking about other "for reference only" documentation? In which case, what DB says...

Now, on another note....Time to burn all those SPC & Sick Sigma books for reference only books as they are "out of control" :biglaugh:
 
C

C Emmons

#8
1. Our auditor normally poses the question: "Does your company have a quality policy? How do you play a part in the policy? They are expecting the employee to be aware of it and how they help achieve it.

2. Our QS is online. There is a "disclaimer" which prints out on the bottom of every page that states "The master document is controlled electronically. Printed copies of this document are not controlled. Quality document users are responsible for ensuring prited copies are valid prior to use.
 
W

Wallyowally

#9
1. I'm agreeing with the thoughts on quality policies. Silly cards are out (whew!). Memorizing is not necessary. Actually understanding the meaning and how it applies to "me" is a good thing (required).

2. On the "For reference only" question, I'm interested in opinions about printing such things as the Corrective Action process, the Employee Training process, or the Peer Review process. From the thoughts above, I can either A) forbid printing, B) get "for reference only" or "uncontrolled" on all printed versions either manually or automatically, or C) Note in the Quality Manual that on-line is official and *ALL* printed versions are uncontrolled/for reference only. I like "C" but want opinions on its validity/acceptability.

Wally
 
C

Craig H.

#10
Wallyowally said:
From the thoughts above, I can either A) forbid printing, B) get "for reference only" or "uncontrolled" on all printed versions either manually or automatically, or C) Note in the Quality Manual that on-line is official and *ALL* printed versions are uncontrolled/for reference only. I like "C" but want opinions on its validity/acceptability.

Wally
Wallyowally:

You might be able to make an audit case for "C", but from a practical standpoint, I'm uncomfortable. "B" is a much, much better option, IMHO.

Craig H.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R FDA Inspection (Audit) Readiness Procedure General Auditing Discussions 14
M Readiness Review Failed - Stage one audit for TS16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
J Guidelines for "readiness" - We're going for our TS 16949 Certification audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
A Readiness review - Kindly give me some pointers on how to face this audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 16
J TS 16949 - Readiness Review or Preassesment audit? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D Verify Audit Trail of SaaS system Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Outsourced Internal Audit requirements for Aerospace Suppliers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 16
D Number of people to be interviewed during an internal audit? Internal Auditing 6
B Gamma Quarterly Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
A Anxiety - ISO Re-registration Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 69
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Q Easy CARs for Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Quarterly Dose Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
H When is a SOC 2 audit necessary? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
J NCR- Failure of contract review process - NADCAP audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
A Internal audit plan and processes for ISO 14001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
C API Q1 internal audit report Internal Auditing 3
P Filled in F48/F49 for internal audit ISO 17025:2017 Internal Auditing 2
A IRIS audit - Discussion about Special Processes General Auditing Discussions 11
J Internal audit random sampling methodology Internal Auditing 2
D Major NC from last audit not fixed not sure how to fix General Auditing Discussions 10
X Sample SOC2 audit report (or a redacted one) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit General Auditing Discussions 2
G Organizing internal audit program for an Integrated QHSE Management System Internal Auditing 13
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
W How do you phrase your internal audit questions? Internal Auditing 3
Z Steps to take before an MDSAP audit for Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
V Csv, excel format - audit trail file of HPLC system ( Empower, openlab, EZchrom or any other ) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
G Not accepting a non conformity during an audit General Auditing Discussions 11
K IATF audit day requirements table 5.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
M IATF - Internal Audit 3 year span Internal Auditing 4
Q Audit report template ISO 9001/14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
Q ISO 9001-2015 Internal audit finding Internal Auditing 14
lanley liao How to understand this words that the planning of internal audit shall take into consideration the results of previous audits? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
P Audit check for IT company (ISO 9001) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
D Supplier audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Go Live With New ERP System before Recertification Audit General Auditing Discussions 6
A Add MDSAP to Internal Audit Schedule Medical Device Related Regulations 0
A Define timeline for Major and Miner Audit finding General Auditing Discussions 4
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
A API Monogram audit review process Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 5
S IATF 16949 Internal Audit Example IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
B Remote IATF 16949 audit preparation General Auditing Discussions 10
M AS9100D Registrar pre-audit requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 15

Similar threads

Top Bottom