Here's a question seeking opinions:
Are manufacturing areas that are kept in a "pig sty" manner a "violation" of the Work Environment clause?
There are areas within my company where "Good Housekeeping" is a foreign phrase. Components have been lost in this area and I suspect that some damage to in-process products has also occurred.
To me, auditing both 6.3 and 6.4 is difficult due to the generality of the clauses. It seems like if you don't find product that is bursting into flames or sitting in three inches of rainwater, or the company is not run out of a refrigerator box there is conformance.
Are manufacturing areas that are kept in a "pig sty" manner a "violation" of the Work Environment clause?
There are areas within my company where "Good Housekeeping" is a foreign phrase. Components have been lost in this area and I suspect that some damage to in-process products has also occurred.
To me, auditing both 6.3 and 6.4 is difficult due to the generality of the clauses. It seems like if you don't find product that is bursting into flames or sitting in three inches of rainwater, or the company is not run out of a refrigerator box there is conformance.